I’m just a freeper … a lonely freeper … at Fitzmas:
There is no direct evidence of anything, just gossip of he said/he said stuff and that isn’t strong enough to convict IMO, but these are mostly probably government employees on the jury.
—-
There is JOY in hell today.
—-
What a sham… a ridiculous prosecution based on hearsay that was not allowed to be adequately challenged by the defense.
—-
Yeah, that concept disappeared a long, long time ago. Nowadays, you can have a “special prosecutor” investigate a crime (that he quickly determines never happened) on the taxpayers’ dime for over a year until he trips up somebody enough to indict a ham sandwich. Thereby justifying the cost of paying a staff and living high on the hog. It is a disgrace.
That last one just fucking KILLS me.
A.
thems to pitiful to care about. i prefer to ignore.
There is only one response to any of these:
HAAAAA haaaaa!
Winger asshat: But Clinton…
Thanks for the link to the message board. The howls are hilarious.
Let’s put this in context – remember the juror selection: Jurors who had a negative view of Shrub were not allowed. [Kind of like the Texas guy contending that he couldn’t be tried under a democratic judge?] And yet they found him guilty on 4 counts.
I meanwhile am doing the “Guilty, guilty, guilty” dance a la Doonesbury.
Dammit – I didn’t say the first part.
I’d say lets hope this sends a reminder to other folk to realise just how much of a scapegoat they can be, but they won’t. Every one of them will think “It can’t/won’t happen to me”.
Yet another stupidhead.
K Lo is verklempt.
As for the last point – may I introduce as evidence:
Exhibit ‘A’ – Starr, Kenneth W.