19 thoughts on “America hates Bush’s war

  1. Why is it “Democrats” vs. “President Bush”? Shouldn’t it be “Democrats” vs. “Republicans”?
    Don’t let them run away from their great adventure.

  2. Gustavo’s right. Which is why we should put up a wall on the border to keep people like Timmy from polluting our Anglo-Protestant cultural essence.

  3. Why is it “Democrats” vs. “President Bush”? Shouldn’t it be “Democrats” vs. “Republicans”?
    Because it’s partly a Wall Street Journal poll, and for them, there are only two camps: those who swear undying fealty to Dear Leader, and the sane.

  4. NYMary: Exactly. The Republicans have been trying to distance themselves from Bush by claiming that he’s “betrayed Reagan’s legacy” when in fact the senior Bushies are all recycled Nixon and Reagan staffers (http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/01/dearest-trex-might-i-borrow-your-axe-please/).
    Bush is in fact the ultimate expression of Reagan’s foul legacy (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040628/editors) — he’s what you get when you take the Republican themes of no-taxes-or-regulation-on-the-rich, mix with the Neo-Confederate “Southern Strategy” (remember Reagan’s little speech at Philadelphia, Mississippi?) and add in a Republican Congress that spent the first six years of Bush’s reign gleefully aiding and abetting his every move.

  5. The video TVNewswer (MediaBistro) had up around 4 am (don’t ask) had *bleeped out the “K”*–wiped it right off the tape–so that Timmeh appeared merely to be stuttering a little. Whodunnit? Was that from the West Coast airing of Nightly News? And was it Pumpkin Head himself who insisted that the “K” be consigned to oblivion? Inquiring minds…

  6. Dear Mr. Russert,
    Can you Spell this?
    I-N-C-O-M-P-E-T-E-N-T
    S-T-E-N-O-G-R-A-P-H-E-R.

  7. Bush is in fact the ultimate expression of Reagan’s foul legacy (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040628/editors) — he’s what you get when you take the Republican themes of no-taxes-or-regulation-on-the-rich, mix with the Neo-Confederate “Southern Strategy” (remember Reagan’s little speech at Philadelphia, Mississippi?) and add in a Republican Congress that spent the first six years of Bush’s reign gleefully aiding and abetting his every move.
    *
    this sums it up nicely

Comments are closed.