Destroy America To Save The Chimp

Via the Raw Story, I love it when Republikkkans show their true colors.

In his first interview as the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan told a reporter that America needs to be attacked by terrorists so that people will appreciate the work that President Bush has done to protect the country.

“At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001],” Milligan said to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, “and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country.”

Milligan, who was elected as the new chair of the Arkansas Republican Party just two weeks ago, also told the newspaper that he is “150 percent” behind Bush in the war in Iraq.

In his acceptance speech on May 19th, Milligan told his fellow Republicans that it was “time for a rediscovery of our values and our common sense.”

5 thoughts on “Destroy America To Save The Chimp

  1. BuggyQ says:

    Dennis Milligan: Poster child for cognitive dissonance.
    We need an attack on the U.S. to make it clear that Bush has made us safer from terrorism.
    On the plus side, this makes it clear that all the smart people are deserting the Republican Party. All they’ve got left are the bits of goo the cosmic poolboy has pulled out of the gene pool.

  2. Michael says:

    Sadly, they’re doing their best to achieve their demented goal…

  3. MapleStreet says:

    Be sure to save the film clip to run in next year’s elections.
    For every republican running from Arkansas, what does the republican party say about Iraq? Cut to clip of this guy blathering what a fine job Shrub is doing and I’m 150% behind him.

  4. pansypoo says:

    has to happen oct 08′. for election purposes.
    assholes.

  5. Nora says:

    They don’t even care about logic, do they?
    I mean, this is just absurd on the face of it. I could see — from a logical standpoint, not from a reality standpoint — making the argument that NOT having an attack is evidence of the Greatness of President Bush, but getting attacked a SECOND TIME on Bush’s watch would OBVIOUSLY prove that he’s utterly incompetent to anyone with half a brain.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: