Today We GetSnott Stanzel, The Ultimate Third-Stringer, Who Explains That McCain Is Not Chimpy’s Man
Q But just to be clear, The Washington Post claimed this morning that this was an implicit endorsement of McCain; you’re saying, no?
MR. STANZEL: I think the headline writers are a little over-eager. I noticed the headline there and that was my impression of it. I think you should look at the words of the President very carefully.
Q So it wasn’t an endorsement today?
MR. STANZEL: No. I just said that.
Q Because beyond the headline — the story itself called it, I believe, an “implicit endorsement” of McCain.
MR. STANZEL: I’m not sure how you get to that point, so —
Q You don’t believe that?
MR. STANZEL: No, I don’t.
OT – Just wanted to check in and recommend the Sadly No! CPAC series. But it’s the “Twice Crowned” part you really have to read. Reminds me of Athenae rant. That good.