Today on Tommy T’s Obsession With The Freeperati – mixed bag o’ nuts edition

Good morning, everyone! Before we get started, I’d like to address a scurrilous rumour that due to last week’s “Obsession” getting front-paged by Kos himself, I’ve become insufferably immodest.
Not true.
I was insufferably immodestlong before that.


Now that that canard has flown innuendo, let’s cycle the airlock and see what putrid posts the Freeperati have to offer…

Our appalling appetizer –Apparently Freepers don’t have credit cards!‏

Credit-Card Fees Curbed

The Wall Street Journal ^

| 05-20-09

Posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 6:28:09 AM byGOP_Lady
Sweeping new restrictions on credit-card companies would ban extra
fees and fluctuating rates and arm tens of millions of consumers with
more information on their debts.
Starting in February 2010, a
Senate bill passed Tuesday would ban practices such as charging
consumers to pay by phone and sudden surges in interest rates. Payments
above the minimum due would be applied to balances with the highest
interest rates. Information once relegated to tiny print must be made
clearer, and consumers will soon be told how long it would take to pay
off a balance if they pay only the minimum due.

To: GOP_Lady
This will simply make it more difficult for marginally creditworthy consumers to get credit.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 6:32:19 AM
byMr Ramsbotham
(“Baldrick, to you the Renaissance was just something that happened to other people.”)

Um – hasn’t that been part of the problem?

To: GOP_Lady
I know many people who will be happy to see this type of government control.
The problem was not the credit card companies/banks but people
living way beyond their means. If this were not the case they could
take their business elsewhere.
It’s not good news if freedom is what you’re after.
When the governmnet(sic) “lightens your load” in one instance it doubles, triples, or quadruples it in another.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 6:34:10 AM

Boucheau is seriously conflicted here.
On the one hand, he disagrees with Mr. Ramsbotham that people living beyond their means is a problem. Or maybe it is.
In the next sentence, he allows that in either case, this is bad news for Freedom.
They do, however, agree that any legislation signed into law by President Obama is bad, because he’s Obama.

To: ninonitti
Another example of redistributing wealth and scr… responsible people who pay their bills on time etc…

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 6:38:48 AM

Yeah! Because of the part of the bill that restricts interest rate increases.
These people clearly inhabit Bizarro-world.
The only “wealth redistribution” I see in credit card-land is out of working stiffs’ pockets to MBNA.

To: JDW11235
“I also don’t necessarily agree it’s the CC companies’ job to educate them.”
The terms are very clearly laid out in the CC agreements.
Most people are too lazy to read them.
Most people are too stupid to read what they sign and deserve to be had more than they are!

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 7:39:40 AM

Those poor old financial institutions! Stupid people need to have clauses in their credit card contracts that obligate them to be sent off to a work farm, because they’re stupid, and banks are all nice and stuff.

And of course, there always has to be a killjoy:

To: Boucheau
The problem was not the credit card companies/banks but people living way beyond their means.
No, that’s not necessarily true at all. In the past, I’ve been in
situations (major car and home repairs, medical bills, and wholly
unexpected college/university fees) in which I would have been royally
screwed if I did not have a credit card to back me up.
credit card companies are in fact THE problem, with their fraudulent
lending and pricing policies, and countless pitfalls, any one of which
leads to major fees and interest rate hikes at usury levels, courtesy
of those fine-print “Important Amendments” we all get in the mail from
time to time. The whole system, as it is now constituted, is one big
debt trap.
Having been screwed myself by my credit card issuers
in the past, I actually agree with Obama on the need for this
legislation because this industry is wildly out of control, with prior
congressional complicity (Kennedy, Biden, and Dodd).
Sorry to burst some bubbles on this thread, but even a clock is right twice a day.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 6:45:36 AM
byVirginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)

That’s“Stopped clock”:.


Well, more and sillier Republicans after the jump, so follow me into the dark, children…

I knew it –Freepers love Dick!‏

Dick Cheney is Mr. Republican

Politico ^

| 5/19/09
| Roger Simon

Posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:04:13 PM bypissant
Dick Cheney is 68, white and bitter. He is the Republican Party today.
Republican Party has no serious wing other than the Cheney wing. The
moderate wing of the Republican Party is distinguished by the fact that
it does not exist, and yet it is still shrinking.
Specter, senator from Pennsylvania, recently left the Republicans for
the Democrats, and Jon Huntsman, the Republican governor of Utah, is
joining the Obama administration as its ambassador to China.
Huntsman’s appointment was announced last week, article after article
said he had been one of his party’s “leading” candidates for the
presidential nomination in 2012.
Leading candidate? With the
possible exception of Salt Lake City, you could fire a cannon down the
main street of any city in America at high noon and not hit a person
who had ever heard of Jon Huntsman.
Everybody has heard of Dick
Cheney. True, a Washington Post headline last week said: “As Cheney
Seizes Spotlight, Many Republicans Wince.” But a wince can sometimes be
mistaken for a spasm of ecstasy.
Cheney has many pluses. He is
very, very good on TV. (People who don’t like what he says overlook how
good he is at saying it.) He is calm, articulate and often courageous.
Who else but Dick Cheney would have the guts to go on “Face the Nation
With Bob Schieffer” and say “in terms of being a Republican, I’d go
with Rush Limbaugh” rather than Colin Powell?
After that,
Maureen Dowd wrote: “Cheney, who had five deferments himself to get out
of going to Vietnam, would rather follow a blowhard entertainer who has
had three divorces and a drug problem (who also avoided Vietnam) than a
four-star general who spent his life serving his country.”
To which the Republican wing of the Republican Party replies, “Yeah? So who wouldn’t?”
of Cheney’s greatest attributes is that he revives the whole “Daddy
Party vs. Mommy Party” argument that has bedeviled Democrats for
Republicans say they are the Daddy Party. They are
strong and will protect us from communists, terrorists and people who
want to take away our guns. Republicans say Democrats are the Mommy
Party. They say Democrats care only about social programs for the poor,
don’t care about national defense and don’t understand terrorism.
Clinton described the dilemma in December 2002 by saying: “When people
feel uncertain, they’d rather have someone strong and wrong than weak
and right.”
Cheney offers a clear choice. He is for
waterboarding to save the United States from terrorism. He is a Daddy
Party kind of guy.
True, President Obama gave the go-ahead for
the military to shoot three pirates last month. But Cheney actually
shot a guy in the head once. How Daddy Party can you get?

To: pissant
The dems are feeling pretty good these days.
Wait til they find out that all those people that voted for Obama did
so because it was “cool”. Now that the excitement is over and “change”
is afoot, voting is for squares.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:08:12 PM
(Tap into America!)

The Dems are feeling pretty good these days?
Well, only because they’re pretty much crushed you at the polls and all.

Besides, it was “cool” to institute some “change” into our “Government”, not to mention having a surplus of “quotation marks” for the first time in a long time.


div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: pissant

He has a few issues I am uncertain about, but,
if he got the nomination, I would not only vote Republican, I would
claim to be a member of the party again.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:12:56 PM
bySensei Ern

Woo hoo! We’re saved! Unca Dick is gonna lead us out of the wilderness – or further into it.

The entire GOP is waiting with bated breath for Sensei Em to recommit to the Party, dontcha know…

div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: pissant

The Republicans could do worse in 2012. And probably will.People were sick and tired of Bush & Co last year. Just bone-weary. Cheney was a large part of that.
Without regard to his qualifications, anyone who thinks Cheney could be elected in 2012 is fooling themselves.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:24:04 PM
(Mitt Romney: Collect the whole set!)

Sssshhhhhh!! Shaddap! You’re spoiling all the fun!

div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: mountainbunny

Liz Cheney…then she could appoint her Dad as Sec of Defense!!!

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:26:38 PM
(WE have a REPUBLIC…IF we can KEEP IT!!!)


To: pissant
And the definition of “white and bitter?” Why,
anyone who does notbend over deeply for thedemocrat party/NY
Times/AFL-CIO andHomosexuals-R-Us.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:30:22 PM

Again with the buttsecks! These guys are more anally fixated than a proctologist taking his final exams.

br />

To: pissant; rabscuttle385; PhilCollins; Impy; org.whodat; dools007
RE :”He’s (Cheney) tanned, he’s rested and his approval ratings can only go up.

LOL. This is certainly true (he’s at 10%) and Obama has no place to go
but down too, problem is it’s along way for both. Cheney is pro-same
sex marraige rights. The Hannity/Levin invasion bots ignore this. .
What’s with the nutty Bush-Cheney posts today anyway.?

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:34:34 PM
(Obama /Pelosi/Bush Theme : “A dollar borrowed or printed is a dollar earned!”)

It’s nostalgia for the days when the GOP controlled everything, tempered by the knowledge of theoutcome of the GOP having controlled everything.
It’s the recollection of someone who gorged himself on a delicacy as a child (say, cherries) until he puked.
You can never look at cherries the same way again, but theconcept of having all of them you could eat is still attractive, even though you know it’s a piss-poor idea in reality.

To: pissant
Dick Cheney is 68, white and bitter.
Wrong: He’s angry about Osama’s(sic) policies that will make this country less safe than when he wasVice President.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:36:41 PM
(When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. – Will Rogers)

I just wanted you guys to know that the above strikeout is not mine. It’s the poster’s.

To: Oldpuppymax; pissant; AuntB
RE :”Why, anyone who does not bend over deeply for the democrat party/NY Times/AFL-CIO and Homosexuals-R-Us.

Cheney is pro-homo rights himself. This is swept under the rug. The
reason why he is worshiped by a few is Rush, hannity, Levin the last
two being invasion cheer leaders. BTW: If you disagree with them you
are a traitor. You can never think they were wrong and be a good

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:42:11 PM
(Obama /Pelosi/Bush Theme : “A dollar borrowed or printed is a dollar earned!”)

And now –the scariest post in the thread!!

To: sickoflibs
I disagree with Rush and Co. all the time. Wish they were as conservative as me.

posted onWednesday, May 20, 2009 2:43:45 PM
(THE Conservative party:

Next up –Freepers divided on terrorist wannabees.

Temple “Terrorists” Could Barely Buy Handguns, Let Alone Missiles!

wpix. ^

| May 21, 2009

Posted onThursday, May 21, 2009 10:54:23 PM byJoeProBono
The FBI’s army of confidential informants seems to increasingly
embed itself with some of the most inept “terrorists” imaginable. I
just skimmed the US Attorney’s criminal complaint against the fearsome
foursome that allegedly targeted two Riverdale synagogues and a
Newburgh airport. I’m left with the sense that they aren’t such a scary
The FBI’s army of confidential informants seems to
increasingly embed itself with some of the most inept “terrorists”
imaginable. I just skimmed the US Attorney’s criminal complaint against
the fearsome foursome that allegedly targeted two Riverdale synagogues
and a Newburgh airport. I’m left with the sense that they aren’t such a
scary bunch.
James Cromitie, David Williams, Onta Williams,
and Laguerre Payen, no doubt wanted to blow up Jewish temples and
military aircraft. They clearly wanted to obtain C-4 and surface-to-air
missiles. The problem is they were fantastically far removed from any
realistic means of obtaining WMDs. In other words, these accused Bronx
bombers were no more capable of executing an explosive attack, than a
little league team is capable of beating the New York Yankees.
In the federal complaint, there’s one recorded conversation in
particular, that illustrates just how feeble these so-called terrorists
were, even when compared, to garden variety drug dealers.
April 23rd, inside a Newburgh house rigged with video and audio
surveillance, one of the suspects made a call to an “unknown female gun
supplier.” The accused terror team wanted to have several handguns for
their night of. .well. . ..terror. Suspect David Williams made plans to
meet the gun dealer later that day, but Williams couldn’t quite procure
the pistols.
The gun-hungry team tried again to pack some heat
on April 28th. Williams finally had a meeting with his gun runner, but
alas, no luck. The complaint reads:
“David Williams learned
from the Female Gun Supplier that she had sold the guns to another
buyer, and David Williams attempted to contact numerous other gun
suppliers. .. David Williams asked Onta Williams to attempt to purchase
guns for the Terrorist Operations. Onta Williams made several calls but
was unsuccessful.”
So let’s pause and do the math. These
menacing terrorists, bent on mass murder, have been trying to find a
few measly handguns for 6 days, and they can’t do it! These are four
grown men, who can’t seem to accomplish something that, sadly,
16-year-olds on the streets of Newark can do by hitting a speed dial
key on their mobile phones!
Finally, on April 30th, a full week
after the terror team started hunting for handguns, they found a
Brooklyn man who agreed to sell them. …hold your breath. … exactly
one .9 millimeter pistol. Now I’m not minimizing the danger posed by
illegal handguns, but one fist full of steel, a terrorist does not

To: JoeProBono

Everytime we bust up a terror plot, oh wait,
man caused disaster plot, the left is going to report it as the
Keystone Cops level of ineptness.
They did that to marginalize the Fort Dix 6.
The LSM is going to do this, be prepared.

posted onThursday, May 21, 2009 10:56:56 PM

To: JoeProBono
I get the distinct feeling that this was done
either as a Public Relations ploy, or as a way to ratchet up tensions
about one issue or another, maybe Jewish support for some new
Or maybe, the FBI is trying to push Congress to pass some
new bill to make us “safe”.

posted onThursday, May 21, 2009 11:09:12 PM
(Brother, you asked for it!)

Pat Buchanan? Is that you??

To: JoeProBono
>The FBI’s confidential informant provided the
fake C-4. The confidential informant provided the mock Stinger Missile

Entrapment anyone?

posted onThursday, May 21, 2009 11:16:39 PM
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)

I do so love to watch the authoritarian and libertarian sides of Freeperville collide with a sickening thud.
This is one of those times.

div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: JoeProBono

Imagine what the MSM would have been saying if the FBI had busted the terrorists plotting the 9/11 job.Why
– just the notion of somebody thinking they could hijack three
airplanes simultaneously and fly them into buildings is just absurd!

posted onThursday, May 21, 2009 11:24:45 PM
(‘Life’s tough…it’s even tougher if you’re stupid.’)

Well, since you mention it…


Next up –Franken over Limbaugh??‏

Why Al Franken Has More Guts Than Rush Limbaugh

Posted onWednesday, May 27, 2009 10:37:44 AM byMikey76
Allow me to begin by saying that I am no fan of Al Franken and I’m
not specifically picking on Rush Limbaugh. If and when Al Franken takes
his seat in the senate, it will be a bad day for America. And I am
using Rush Limbaugh as an example for all the radio and television talk
show hosts, all the writers and bloggers out there including myself,
who have ever despaired of the direction of the country, deplored the
behavior of our elected politicians and thought that we had more common
sense in our little finger that they had in their whole body.
The media has an important function in our society, which is why it is
referred to in the first amendment. The ability to educate, inform and
persuade is a powerful tool in the political process. But for all the
words spoken by Rush and the other talk show hosts, for all the words
written in newspapers, magazines and on the Internet, the stimulus
package passed for want of one vote in the senate. Government health
care, a nearly four trillion dollar budget, cap and trade may all be
forced on us for the lack of one or two votes.
For all the
talking, all the educating, all the informing done by talk radio and
other conservative/alternative media, the country is falling rapidly
into the black hole of statism. Why? First, while Rush’s fifteen to
twenty million listeners sounds like a lot, there are over three
hundred million people in this country, over one hundred million
voters. And not all those listeners agree with Rush’s viewpoint, some
are just entertained, and this goes for all of talk radio. The point
here is that the vast majority of people in the country don’t tune in
to talk radio, they don’t follow the news closely, they are not
politically educated or aware. As products of a government education
and fans of reality TV, they easily fall for a demagogue like Barak

To: Mikey76
Rush is more valuable on the air, getting this stuff out there then as a minimally influential politician
I shutter to think of what this country would be like without him each day.

posted onWednesday, May 27, 2009 10:40:51 AM
(“an armed society is a polite society” Robert A. Heinlein)

And I shudder to think of your English teacher going home to suck on a tailpipe after reading one of your posts.

div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: Mikey76

Rush’s fifteen to twenty million listeners
sounds like a lot, there are over three hundred million people in this
country, over one hundred million voters.

if every American voted in the last election we wouldn’t be in this problem. what was the real percentage of voters?
i understand what you are saying but he is making too much money to take a senators seat.

posted onWednesday, May 27, 2009 11:02:42 AM
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)

Um – dude – 27% is still 27%.

div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: Right Cal Gal

I think al frankenstien is a no talent hack, i never said he has guts. i said i know why rush isn’t doing it.
franken will be the first we tar and feather…like the good old days, that is what happened after the Tea parties.
p.s. you bring the tar.

posted onWednesday, May 27, 2009 11:19:19 AM
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)

(forwarded to the FBI)

p>Next – Losing Hispanics? You say that like it’s a BAD thing!‏

div class=”blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>For Republicans, Court Fight Risks Losing Hispanics to Win Conservatives

New York Times ^

| May 27, 2009
| Adam Nagourney

Posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:56:11 AM byZakeet
President Obama’s selection of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for a seat on
the Supreme Court has put the Republican Party in a bind, forcing it to
weigh the cost of aggressively opposing the first Hispanic named to the
court against its struggle to appeal to Hispanic voters.
Republican Party has been embroiled in a public argument over whether
to tend to the ideological interests of its conservative base or to
expand its appeal to a wider variety of voters to regain its strength
after the defeats of 2008. Many conservative activists and political
strategists came out fiercely against Judge Sotomayor as soon her name
was announced, denouncing her as liberal and promising Mr. Obama a
tough nomination fight.
“The G.O.P. has to make a stand,” said
Scott Reed, who managed Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign. “This is
what the base and social conservatives really care about, and we need
to brand her a liberal with some out-of-the-mainstream positions.
Forget about cosmetics and ethnic heritage, and focus on her record.”
some Republicans warned that the image of the party’s throwing a
roadblock before a historic nomination could prove politically
devastating. Republicans saw a dip in Hispanic support in 2008, after
eight years in which President George W. Bush and his political aides
made a concerted effort to increase the Republican appeal to Hispanics,
the nation’s fastest-growing group of voters.
“If Republicans
make a big deal of opposing Sotomayor, we will be hurling ourselves off
a cliff,” said Mark McKinnon, who was a senior adviser to Mr. Bush and
has long advocated expanding the party’s appeal. “Death will not be
assured. But major injury will be.”

To: Zakeet
Hispanics? We don’t have any Hispanics.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:57:12 AM
(“Do your duty in all things.” Robert E. Lee)

I kinda prefer:

We failed, but in the good providence of God apparent failure often proves a blessing”

Robert E. Lee

To: Zakeet
The GOP would be making a mistake to take
advice from the NYT. Better to take a short run hit (and I’m
unconvinced that this is going to occur)and win in the long run based
on consistent values.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:59:07 AM
(He who has the guns makes the rules)

…when all those Hispanics go back where they came from, of course…

div class=”EC_a2 blockquote” style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: Zakeet

LOL -=- the hispanics need to hot foot it back to where they came from.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 9:02:00 AM
(You abolish your responsibilities, you surrender your rights.)


To: Zakeet
Phony argument…Obamas(sic) policies will hurt the
Mexicans as much as anyone else. If they are aware they are getting
hurt by his policies they will vote him out. If they are to stupid to
see that then it doesn’t matter they are zombies to the liberals and we
will not get their votes. Communists vote four(sic) other communists. We
should follow our principles where ever that leads us.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 9:06:46 AM
(Just another backstabbing conservative)

And thoseCommunist Zombie Mexicans? They’re the worst of all!!

To: Zakeet
Republicans risk much more if they don’t do
anything. They need you to think you will look like a racist if you
don’t confirm the LaRaza Latina.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 9:14:20 AM

Ok – that one made my head hurt.
Shorter version:“That beaner called me a racist!!”

And finally, gentle people, it’s time for dessert –Petraeus says close Gitmo. Freepers crap pants.‏

Petraeus Backs Closing Gitmo ^

| 5/27/08

Posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:27:52 AM byksen
PRAGUE — The head of U.S. Central Command, General David Petraeus,
has told RFE/RL he thinks that “on balance” the expected closure of the
Guantanamo Bay detention facility and abandonment of so-called enhanced
interrogation techniques will “help” U.S. efforts in Iraq and
Afghanistan, as well as the struggle against transnational extremist

(Excerpt) Read more

Haven’t seen this posted here yet. So . . . how long till the Democrats start singing General Petraeus’ praises?

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:27:54 AM

To: ksen
How long before conservatives decry him? 3..2..1… I’ll start. He’s wrong. End of discussion.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:30:04 AM
(Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)

To: romanesq
Someone posted a week or two ago that Petraeus was a Democrat.
This move puts him in contention to replace either Hillary! or Biden
down the road. A Barry/Petraeus ticket would be formidable, and it
takes national defense issues off the table, at least as far as the
Barry zombies and MSM are concerned.
Nice move.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:33:45 AM
(Where can I take ‘Austrian’ lessons?)

Obama’s mind control knows no limits!

To: ksen
In an exclusive interview in Prague…
that he made this statement there.I hear Prague is nice this time of
year. Gets cold in the winter though. Especially if you are wearing

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:33:50 AM
(Bumper sticker I saw on a older pickup, “Eat my Carbon”)

Don’t tease me, bro!


To: ksen
Well, if the General won’t fight for Gitmo, why should we?

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:36:17 AM

To: ksen
Perhaps he’s taken up what Rush said yesterday. If you want to succeed, lie like a Liberal.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:36:30 AM
byKent C

Ok, now – let’s all say it together, guys:“General Betray-us!!”

To: ksen
Turned into a tool. What a pity.

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:48:24 AM

To: GOPsterinMA
I don’t know if hes a demo ,but I know hes a bilderberg

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:57:10 AM
(“If you follow the crowd,you get no further than the crowd”)

To: ladtx
I used to think Alcatraz was a good location, but it’s
too close to people and could draw too many undesirables. Would you
want your family member stalked and killed by extremists just because
he was a guard at Extremitraz? Here’s
my idea of what to do with the Guantanamo detainees. I haven’t heard
this any where but I think it will work if you must close Guantanamo.
Where is the most secure location in the US? No it’s not a supermax Cat
5 prison. Where can guards go in complete anonymity? Where can Red
Cross, International Press, or whoever be taken in complete secrecy and
not observe anything but the condition of the detainees?Here it is: I
recommend that they be taken to some newly constructed facility in Area
Think about the isolation and the security of the area. The current
people who work there are flown in from McCaren Airport in Vegas. The
same thing could be done with the detainees and anybody that’s needed
for support. Congressional visits, Red Cross and every other human
rights organization would be very controlled. They would be flown in
and driven by windowless busses to the detainee sight.Anybody see any
major flaws with using Area 51 to detain these extremists?

posted onThursday, May 28, 2009 8:54:49 AM
(Life is Tough, But It’s a Lot Tougher When You’re a Liberal.)

Hmmm – not off the top of my head…


Although they probably have pretty advanced interrogation techniques…


Well, that’s more than enough for one week.
Off to Decontamination, everyone – we’re featuring premium hot wax after the bleach spray this week only.


Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

7 thoughts on “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession With The Freeperati – mixed bag o’ nuts edition

  1. I disagree with Rush and Co. all the time. Wish they were as conservative as me.
    Good gravy. I’d like to hear more of this chap’s opinions.

  2. Athenae says:

    Seriously, do these people have a pathological need to rename everything? Dimmicrats, Obambi, Extremitraz?
    When we want to insult people we just call them Republicans, for chrissakes.

  3. left rev. says:

    Why am I suddenly reminded of that dude in Airplane spinning wildly around the ATC room screaming “Auntie Em! Auntie Em! It’s a twister! It’s a twister!”?
    Don’t bogart that popcorn, man.

  4. A –
    In fairness, “Obambi” was coined by MoDo.
    Which, oddly, strengthens your point.

  5. And anyway, isn’t “Extremitraz” a new power drink?

  6. MapleStreet says:

    When you name something, you exercise control over it.
    Then when you comically mispronounce it, you communicate distain towards its worthlessness.

  7. MapleStreet says:

    On Credit Card fees, wouldn’t charging 20% be usury?
    On the terrorists, I agree with the freeper poster on why does every busted terrorist cell get communicated as a Keystone Cops routine. After all, you have:
    1) The pizza delivery guys who were gonna attack Fort Dix with rifles.
    2) The Rastafarian Floridians who were gonna bomb the tower in Chicago, even though they had never even been to Chicago.
    3) The police investigation of a Quaker peace discussion (featured in Fahrenheit 9/11).
    4) And now the folks who were get C4 to blow up houses of worship, even though they apparently did everything but call up the FBI and ask for a loan.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: