Good morning gentle people! Time to get suited up and unbolt that first drum of toxic mental waste product that passes for discourse at Free Republic.
Uh oh. Looks like Caribou Barbie’s lustful lemmings have had about enough of the FR skeptics who argue that she could screw up a two-car funeral, and would make Dubya look like a MENSA member:
blockquote>Anti Palin comments are counter-productive and should not be tolerated among us. (Vanity)
myself
Posted onSaturday, November 14, 2009 12:57:36 PM byse_ohio_young_conservative
Those of you. You know who you are.
I don’t care who you are
or what your reasoning is. Your siding with the maistream(sic) media against
Palin is doing nothing to help Republicans or Conservatism in general.
You are hurting your own cause.
And by “yours”, I mean mineminemine.
Unless you are a DU troll. Or a liberal
Republican who has no idea what the heck you are even talking about.
Or someone who puts periods. In the middle of sentences.
Ani
Palin comments (such as “shes not fit to be President”) should be seen
as trolling and should not be tolerated on Free Republic, any
conservative web site or any conservative setting. While I am not
calling for anyone to be purged from this website. I, and others are
going to keep a list of Palin hating trolls so the rest of you know who
has credibility and who doesn’t. who is a troll, and who isn’t.
Uh oh. He’s making a LIST! And possibly checking it twice…
We
will know your posting history. We know where your opinons(sic) are coming
from. The Palin bashing is getting old. And the cat calls will likely
increase for Jim Robinson to do some fall cleaning if this continues.So, please. stop inflicting damage on conservatism.
1
posted onSaturday, November 14, 2009 12:57:37 PM
byse_ohio_young_conservative
I’m sure he expected a rousing burst of support from his fellow Palin pud-pounders.
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI thought you got this out of your system earlier
this week.Look, folks have to defend Palin for themselves. She has all
of the class in the world and she will rise above the crap..
If
you want folks to stop saying things that are wrong or unfair, call
them out.. make them prove the point, give the facts why they are wrong.
We don’t make people shut up here. We just don’t.
From Wiki:
Starting in April 2007 … members sympathetic to the
former mayor’s candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the
site.They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to
weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign…
Robinson himself endorsedFred Thompson and was an enthusiastic backer of his campaign.
Ok then, other thatthat, we just don’t. Unless, of course, you mention Romney. And how’d that Fredhead thing work out for ya, Jimbo?
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI’m pro-Palin. I’m anti-Shut-up-and-go-away-if-you-can’t-see-things-my-way. Smacks of small minds.
p>To: REDWOOD99I understand. But geesh. It is wearing thin. And it is just what the left wants to see.
No, this is what the left wants to see – you guys setting the complete nutcases against the almost complete nutcases. And while you’re busy knifing each other over perceived ideological purity, we’ll just keep cleaning up the mess you guys left the last time you had your loathsome way.
Uh oh – here come the Palinbots!
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeWhenever some of our “self proclaimed”
conservatives start taking pot shots at Palin and others like her, its
a dead give away that they are really 5th columnists or moles. They
post their garbage hoping to cause discord and defeatism among real
conservatives.
p>To: SaveTheChiefIt is not a debate. It is either a left wing attack or it is stupidity. Either way, it is counter productive.
Of course Palin is fit to be President. She has more exec experiance(sic) than the President we have now.19
posted onSaturday, November 14, 2009 1:06:04 PM
byse_ohio_young_conservative
(Palin 2012)div class=”ecxa2″>To: se_ohio_young_conservative
I smell another purge coming.
p>To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI support Sarah Palin for President in 2012.
I also support free speech, and believe that the best thing to do with Palin bashers is either educate or ignore them.
In my opinion reducing Free Republic to a narrow base of people who
agree with each other on everything isn’t going to achieve anything
positive. Just the opposite.
blockquote>
I love Sarah Palin, however, I DO wish she would
return to the Church, because I don’t see how she can battle the evil
administration that is now in place without the Sacraments. Here’s apost of someone
who has had “extreme” lust and pornography issues in his life. If he
can curb these down to a minimum [he continually works at it] as he has
done and speak so highly of the Church that is helping him to do it,
imagine what Sarah Palin can do with the same Sacraments. It’s mind
boggling when one really thinks about it. “You betcha!”
posted onSaturday, November 14, 2009 1:12:31 PM
bymlizzy
(“Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person” –Mother Teresa.)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative“I understand. But geesh. It is wearing thin.”
I thank the Lord that you are just a poster here and not someone
with any real ability to force your views on the rest of the world.
32
posted onSaturday, November 14, 2009 1:09:36 PM
byREDWOOD99div class=”ecxa2″>To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Somehow, I’m just not feeling the love here.
Poor Freepers – standing up for free speech on their forum. Unless, of course, it’s anything good about Giuliani, Ron Paul, John McCain (this year – may not apply to previous years), George W.Bush (also may not apply to previous years), Mitt Romney, Huckabee, or anything bad about Tea Parties (a leisure service of AT&T).
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeYou betcha. Maybe “anti-Palin” posters should
have a gold star affixed to their screen names so they can be shunned
more efficiently? Would that satisfy you Palin worshippers? Or perhaps
a semi-annual Freeper test to root out “anti-Palinites?” If a Freeper
doesn’t believe that Sara Palin is either God or Reagan reincarnated
they should be banned from FreeRepublic. Or Better Yet!!! Just changed
the freaking website name to “SarahPalinisGod.com!” /s
And now, ladies and gentlemen – the most wonderful description I have ever seen of the nutcases that populate Free Republic – posted in oblivious honesty by one of their own! Enjoy:
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeGood luck with that.We got:
Code Orange Freepers
Neo Confederates
Rabid Catholic Haters
Evo Nazis
Hard Core RINO’s
Secessionists,
and people holed up in bunkers that only post when they aren’t looking
through the gun slits for the black helicopters.Getting everyone on
board to play nice ain’t happening.
That’s OK though, it’s the sound of freedom. Just know that 99.9% of
Freepers are just everyday people whose hearts and minds are in the
right place. If they disagree with you on Palin, they agree with you
somewhere else. Just move along to a different topic.45
posted onSaturday, November 14, 2009 1:14:47 PM
byIrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it’s the same thing!)
Now much I can add to that, I’m afraid.
More hot pockets of putrid potpourri after the AIEEEEEE!!!
you’re a braver man than i to wade through that intellectual sewer
*) Can we profile Marines as they are trained to shoot and have used it 2 of the 14 times???
*) Just love the person talking about Palin and the Sacraments. Talking of the Sacraments is rather Catholic / Episcopalian and Palin’s church is rather non-traditional.
*) Palin 2012. Maybe the Mayans were right. Palin runs in 2012, gets elected in Nov 2012, and the world ends Dec 2012. It all makes sense now. It all makes sense !
Aw, man, did you have to do that to Raphael? That’s one of my all-time fave paintings, and now it’s just…eeew…
‘99.9% of Freepers are just everyday people whose hearts and minds are in the right place.’ If by right place he means up their collective asses.
“Funny though, it seems that the GOP is actually having similar thoughts. They’re considering their own Purity Test (via TPMDC).”
Kibitzer
The really funny thing about that is (as Olbermann pointed out last night) that Reagan himself wouldn’t have been able to pass their “Reagan test”.