When Bill Clinton Talks…

From Album4

…people listen.

When even Faux News (warning — Faux News link) talks about “chrisma and eloquence” I guess it means one hell of a speech. And while I personally thought it ran a tad long…hey, what do I know?

Clinton’s a politician…but, as I mentioned a couple of days ago in the Crack Van, that’s ok…in contrast, the Redumblicans sound like sociopaths.

More reviews and comments here, here, and here. One last thing I’ll note is that while Democrats can take pride in Bill Clinton, the Rethugs have to hide their last president in the attic, lest anyone be reminded…

8 thoughts on “When Bill Clinton Talks…

  1. MapleStreet says:

    In contrast, how many total minutes of RNC airtime were taken by anyone from the prior repub president?
    @Oscar and @Michael, I’d question how much of these were concessions given up by Clinton to get other legislation moved through. Clinton met a lot of maliciousness (whitewater, Monica, etc.) ksome deserved, some not. I remember well that the conservatives, at any whiff of Clinton, would loudly proclaim, “He isn’t MY president.” (Interestingly, one occaision was when I was talking to someone in the military. Something about Commander in Chief).

  2. robertearle says:

    “Oh, and to stray slightly off-topic, I think the “correct” answer to the nonsense question of “are we better off today than we were four years ago?” is, “Of course we are. Four years ago Bush was president.” ”
    But you broke the rules!
    The question they want to ask isn’t “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”, it’s “are you better off than you were four years ago…and no fair mentioning Bush!”

  3. robertearle says:

    One of my favorite parts (and i had LOTS of favorite parts) about the whole thing IS that he went that long.
    More and more (and maybe rightly so) the broadcast networks have been cutting back on convention coverage (because the news networks are doing it, so why bother, etc). They’re down to one night of “prime time” per night, 9 PM to 10PM CDT.
    So it gets to 10PM, and Bill just keeps on talking; heck, he was just getting warmed up.
    ‘Cause what are the networks gonna do about it, take him off?! He’s Bill effing Clinton, fer chrissakes!

  4. MichaelF says:

    Glass-Steagall.
    I wasn’t that big of a Clinton fan during the 90s, for the reasons you mention…but after watching eight years of Bush, then four years of Redumblican sabotage and obstructionism, lesser of evils is better than plain pure evil.

  5. pansypoo says:

    butbutbut the rite seems to embrace clinton now. guess he no longer seems socialist.

  6. Some individuals really have a fear of getting older. They dont want to be viewed by society as a has been. They arent really sure what their future holds so they tend to dwell on it. They may have memories of their own parents or grandparents with difficulties as they got older. It is only natural not to want to follow along that same path.
    If you want to have a great sex life after the age of 60 then you need to really think about it now. What is your current sex life like? Do you enjoy the activity or do you just go through the motions? Are you in a serious and committed relationship that you would definitely like to still be involved in when that time comes?http://dfdfdfd.com – gdgd
    Some people in their 30s and even their 40s put sex on the back burner. That is understandable with all of the various commitments we often have in our lives. People are on the fast track and over committed. There are family issues, career, and trying to find some time for yourself. It can leave a person drained and with two people on different schedules it is even more difficult.
    Many researchers will tell you that the type of sex life you have in your younger years will influence how it is for you after 60. So if you arent happy with what you have now you need to make some changes. Finding ways to be very happy with your own sexuality is very important. The number of people who arent sexually happy is very high, yet very few of them are willing to express what needs to change to their partners.
    Part of the problem though is the attitude that earlier generations had about sex. Many women still feel that it is their duty to please their man. Therefore they dont talk openly about wanting more or less sex. They dont express their desires of what they want to see happen. Since no one is bringing it up, their partners just assume they are pleasing them.

  7. Oscar Leroy says:

    “Democrats can take pride in Bill Clinton”
    We can all be proud of his repeal of Glass-Steagle, which helped pave the way for the financial meltdown of 2008, his gutting of welfare, Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and the Defense of Marriage Act, and of course NAFTA.

  8. MichaelF says:

    I’m sure Clinton made some concessions as political calculus, and browsing around the interwebs came across this reminder of how toxic the Redumbs were even that far back:
    http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/09/bill-clintons-forgotten-class-war.html
    I was also younger, living in Madison–which allowed me to let my librul flag fly high–and had much less understanding of politics and economics.
    On the other hand…repeal of Glass-Steagall was pretty awful, particularly since Redumblicans, being shameless, use that to deflect criticism of Junior’s ham-fisted economic program (well, when they’re not blaming the recession on the Carter-era Community Reinvestment Act). I didn’t think it was necessary to say in so many words “the era of big government is over,” especially given that it’s not over and will never be over (just my opinion, but nuclear weapons alone will always mean big government…also, to be a little more serious — and as Clinton pointed out last night — Repugs, conservatives, and even Tea Partiers don’t mind government at all when it’s pouring money into their pet projects).
    Again, though, my less-than-enthusiastic attitude towards Bill was probably more me than him. Times change, I got older, I’m living in Loosiana — the deep blue part — and am much more willing to accept even DLC types, because, if nothing else, they aren’t just plain nuts.
    Oh, and to stray slightly off-topic, I think the “correct” answer to the nonsense question of “are we better off today than we were four years ago?” is, “Of course we are. Four years ago Bush was president.” His retirement from office is in itself enough to make things better.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: