Good morning, gentle people! I hope your holiday was a wonderful one.
Well, let’s get right to the stupid, shall we? I mean, as schlong as we’re all here…
Donald Trump: ‘Schlonged’ was not a vulgar insult
Mashable ^ | December 22, 2015 | Juana SummersPosted on 12/22/2015 8:02:37 PM by Cringing Negativism Network
Nearly 24 hours after he said that Hillary Clinton had been “schlonged” by Barack Obama during her failed 2008 presidential campaign, Donald Trump took to Twitter to defend his comments.
Schlonged, the Republican businessman said in a tweet, was not a vulgar reference to a penis. Instead, he argued, he meant “beaten badly.”
Once again, #MSM is dishonest. “Schlonged” is not vulgar. When I said Hillary got “schlonged” that meant beaten badly.
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 23, 2015
Trump went on to defend his comments, saying that NPR’s Neal Conan had once used the phrase to refer to the trouncing at the polls that the Walter Mondale-Geraldine Ferraro presidential ticket received in the 1984 election.
(woo-hoo, did not take Trump long to respond)
**********
Hoo-wa. Good for Donald.
To: Cringing Negativism NetworkWhen I said Hillary got “schlonged” that meant beaten badly.
Yeah, beaten badly with a big penis.
To: Cringing Negativism NetworkI am not a NYer and to me it’s an obscenity.
To: ConservativeMind
To: Cringing Negativism Network
To: Lisbon1940
Yes, that one’s delightful as well. I’ve been searching for a replacement for “dick-smacked”, and “cock-walloped” just feels too derivative. So if nothing else, I guess I can say Trump was good for something this year.
84 posted on 12/22/2015 8:47:12 PM by HoosierDammit (“When that big rock n’ roll clock strikes 12, I will be buried with my Tele on!” Bruce Springsteen)
Seriously – can’t we all get a schlong?
If You Care About Trump’s ‘Schlonged’ Comment, You’re a Dumb Schmuck
Breitbart.com ^ | 12-22-2015 | Ben ShapiroPosted on 12/22/2015 9:08:21 PM by servo1969
Here’s what Trump said. “Everything that’s been involved in Hillary has been losses,” Trump averred. “Even her race to Obama, she was going to beat Obama. I don’t know who’d be worse. I don’t know. How does it get worse? She was favored to win and she got schlonged.”
Schlong, of course, is Yiddish for penis. So she got reamed. Or screwed. Or any other plethora of English-language equivalents.
But no, Trump’s vulgarity is suddenly the talk of the town. Not Hillary’s lies about Trump appearing ISIS promotional videos. The fact that Hillary Clinton must face down that awful sexist New Yorker who made a foreign-language reference to a penis.
Well, bring forth the fainting couch.
Jennifer Palmieri, Hillary’s campaign communications director, tweeted, “We are not responding to Trump but everyone who understands the humiliation this degrading language inflicts on all women should.”
Yes, Hillary surely feels degraded by Trump’s comments. Hillary, that delicate little flower who campaigns with a woman who labeled her 5-year-old sister “sex property” and dropped a false rape allegation against an innocent man. Hillary, that Arkansas belle who attacks her husband’s sexual assault victims. Hillary, that magnificent specimen of feminism, who laughs at legally defending a child molester. Hillary, that blooming rose of womanhood, who rides her husband’s semen-stained coattails to the White House.
So – the almost-virgin-Ben thinks “dick-slapped” isn’t vulgar just because a short-fingered vulgarian said it?
His last name is “Shapiro”, so he’s an expert, right?
(from that noted bastion of anti-Semitism, Haaretz ) :
Trump Uses Crude Yiddish Term to Deride Hillary Clinton
Clinton ‘got schlonged’ by Obama in the 2008 Democratic nomination, Trump tells supporters at rally, accuses Clinton of lying when she said ISIS used videos of him to recruit militants.
I’m as prone to unrealistic overuse of Yiddish as Shelly Pfefferman, but “schlonged” is not a verb. Even when used by a putz.
— emily nussbaum (@emilynussbaum) December 22, 2015
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.693164
Oops.
OK – back to the elementary school playground:
To: boycott
To: servo1969
Jews Whine About Schlongs
Daily Stormer
December 26, 2015
Hey Jews, great news: something new to whine about!
Attendees at the Yiddish New York cultural event hosted at the 14th Street YMHA had choice words — in English and Yiddish — for the Republican presidential candidate, expressing a mix of outrage and amusement at Trump’s use of the word “schlonged” on the campaign trail.
“It’s really perverse. It’s a filthy word in this context,” said Bob Blacksberg, a clarinetist who plays Klezmer music along with two of his sons.
“Everything he says is disgusting and he intends it to be disgusting,” said Miriam Isaacs, a Yiddish professor and linguist who is teaching a workshop at the festival.
The neo-Nazis at “The Daily Stormer” are all in for The Darnold, and they don’t care what the Seig Heil you think.
And the final nail in the coffin:
There was a 2007 episode of “The Man Show,” where, during a segment on pornography, there was a deep discussion about “spunk,” “neanderthal women pleasuring the wooly mammoth,” “delightful vaginas of yesteryear,” along with their “donkey-schlonged male counterparts” (which are apparently “angry, purple and veiny”).
There was a 2010 review of an undoubtedly charming cable TV show called “Hung,” that followed the adventures of a “formidably schlonged sports coach.”
Then there was a 2011 episode of NPR’s now-defunct “Talk of the Nation,” where host Neal Conan, speaking on the death of Geraldine Ferraro, noted that she was the first woman to run for vice president on a major party ticket, but “that ticket went on to get schlonged at the polls.”
In a 2014 article about the death of Phillip Seymour Hoffman, his role in “Boogie Nights,” where he played a “gauche gay boom operator with a crush on long-schlonged superstar, Dirk Diggler” was cited.
And finally, there’s a 2014 gossip column talking about a participant in a British reality TV show who was described as “pint-sized and long-schlonged.”
So there you have it. It’s just an often used, common political expression … assuming you’re discussing the size of a candidate’s penis or a woman losing an election to a man.
Ok – moving right aschlong….
Since we’re on the topic of batshit crazy white supremacists – The KKK took their baby away!!
Anonymous Begins Publishing Ku Klux Klan Member Details Online
ibtimes.com ^ | 11/2/2015 | David GilbertPosted on 11/2/2015 10:30:41 AM by rktman
Hacktivist group Anonymous has begun publishing the personal details of members of the Ku Klux Klan as its campaign of cyberwar against the white supremacist group escalates.
Anonymous, the amorphous online activist collective, last week promised to reveal the identity of 1,000 members of the KKK after coming into possession of the private information through a compromised Twitter account associated with the group.
***********
How about the kkk start releasing personal info on ‘anonymous’?
To: rktmanI suspect 4 out of 5 ‘Klansmen’ are undercover ATF, FBI, or other agent provocateurs (or maybe someone who just got a good deal on white sheets) – so good luck in separating the chaff from the wheat…
To: rktman
Anyone want to bet that they claim the majority are Republicans?
6 posted on 11/2/2015 10:34:42 AM by ExTxMarine (Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
To: rktmanAre there only 1000 members of the KKK? I confess I don’t know. Being a right-wing ultraconservative, I don’t pal around with fascist organization members.
Why the liberals associate the KKK with us, I’ll never understand. I just chalk it up to liberals being typically gullible and misinformed.
To: rktman
I would like to see them publish details on the number of congress critters who are members of or affiliated with the communist party.
I doubt that would serve their purpose at all.
69 posted on 11/2/2015 12:06:35 PM by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
Iraqi politician Ahmed Chalabi who pushed Bush to invade Iraq dies
Reuters ^ | 11/03/2015 | Y STEPHEN KALIN AND SAIF HAMEED
Posted on 11/3/2015 5:39:47 AM by SeekAndFindAhmed Chalabi, the smooth-talking Iraqi politician who pushed Washington to invade Iraq in 2003 with discredited information on Saddam Hussein’s military capabilities, died on Tuesday of an apparent heart attack.Haitham al-Jabouri, secretary of parliament’s financial panel that Chalabi had chaired, said attendants had found him dead in his bed in his Baghdad home. A news flash on Iraqi state television said the cause was a heart attack.A secular Shi’ite, Chalabi rose to prominence as leader of the then-exiled Iraqi National Congress, which played a major role in encouraging the U.S. administration of former President George W. Bush to invade Iraq and oust Saddam.
“There are some people who will remember him in a good way, and there are others, to be honest, do not like and did not want his politics,” said former prime minister Ayad Allawi.
“But regardless, Iraq lost a man who had an important contribution, important commitments towards the nation and he tried to offer what he could to this country.”
Chalabi, born in 1944 into a wealthy Baghdad family, returned to Iraq shortly after Saddam’s fall, the culmination of years of work abroad pressing and charming Washington to oust the man who ruled Iraq with an iron fist for decades.
He ultimately succeeded by persuading the United States that Saddam Hussein had links to al Qaeda and possessed weapons of mass destruction in the wake of the September 11 attacks, claims that later proved unfounded.
After the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, he could often be seen in Baghdad flanked by dozens of bodyguards as he forged ties with political figures and powerful clerics.
1 posted on 11/3/2015 5:39:47 AM by SeekAndFind
Ah, Chalabi.
Hero of the Freeperati.
The only one to come forth and persuade this country that we should go in and pay Saddam back for 9/11.
The Freeperati, one and all, were singing his praises – and for all I know, praising his singing.
For example:
To: areafiftyoneI am a little shocked at these turn of events with Dr. Chalabi. I exchanged email with him on a few occasions in the early 90’s and he was a very sweet man, very caring.
What happened? He helped so many Iraqi’s, very important ones at that, escape Saddam, what is up with him? I am so disappointed and hope this arrogance reported is overblown.
Matter of fact, Saddam’s bombmaker, who no longer wanted to be a chief nuclear scientist for Saddam, making WMD’s, particularly a nuclear bomb, well Chalabi was the one to get him out too. Tsk tsk!
In retrospect?
To: SeekAndFind
Rot in hell.
2 posted on 11/3/2015 5:40:57 AM by nonliberal (Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.)
.
To: SeekAndFind
Good, I’m glad he’s dead, the only sad thing is that it didn’t happen 15 years ago before Chalabi lied us into a needless war for his personal gain, the fools in the national security apparatus believed him, and we lost 4,400 of our best and bravest young men and women, countless others maimed for life, and trillions spent for what?
3 posted on 11/3/2015 5:44:53 AM by laconic (M)
To: SeekAndFind
Saddam Hussein had repeatedly broken the peace agreement of the Gulf War.
Even Kerry and Clinton were advocating war against Saddam in 1998.
Will Sidney Blumenthal get this headline regarding our war against Libya when Sid dies???
Who’s the money man behind Sid’s lobbying? How much of it did Hillary get?
10 posted on 11/3/2015 7:06:47 AM by a fool in paradise (Will Hillary’s testimony on Benghazi be under oath? Baseball players were tried for perjury.)
Thank you for all you do.
Signed
-A Grateful Nation
Of course, look at the Trump comment in context. The Trump that said he wasn’t going to say anything about what ladies do in the bathroom because it is disgusting but went on a 5 minute monologue on his disgust.
No sexist slurs there. No not at all.
Today’s news: Trump says H. Clinton started it.
Just can’t figure out if Trump’s long history of getting in twitter wars and saying others (including other candidates for the repub nomination) started it.
Is that a kindergartener in a whinny voice trying to get away with something they know is wrong (and any adult letting them get away with it is dumb as a rock and essentially enabling them to try the same ploy in the future)? OR is it a bully blaming their victim for their behavior ?