Tag Archives: Newt Gingrich

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Iowa Caucasians Caucus Edition

What a fun week it’s been, gentle people – drums of Freeper toxic waste (triple redundancy score!) have been piling up faster than I can catalogue them, much less open and decontaminate them.

Needless to say, the whole of Freeperville is awash in Santorum, so this one’s going to be more icky than normal.

Suits ON! Blowers ON! Airlock door OPEN! Let’s GO!

First one up –Romney takes Iowa – Jim Rob takes nitroglycerin!

Iowa GOP: Romney wins caucuses [Romney 30,015, Santorum 30,007]
CNN ^ | 1/4/12

Posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:20 AM bySlings and Arrows

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney beat former Sen. Rick Santorum by a margin of just 8 votes in the Iowa GOP caucuses, the chairman of the Iowa Republican Party announced early Wednesday.

********************************

Gee, what a surprise.
1 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:25 AM bySlings and Arrows
Not really, no. If you expected anything else, you’re a nutcase, or Michelle Bachmann (but I repeat myself).

To: Slings and Arrows

Tokyo Rove had a box of Romney ballots ready just in case.

New MSM headline: “Landslide Mitt gets mandate from Iowa!”

3 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:12:13 AM byPAConservative1

“Tokyo Rove”?
Funny. I remember not so long ago, when you buttmunches were kissng his ass like it was the first time you’d ever gotten to first base.
Allow me to remind you, by posting a pic I took fromthe very forum you’re currently posting in, during the second term of the Dubya Administration, when you imbeciles thought “Tokyo Rove” was all that and a bag of chips :
RoveBastard
.
Ring any bells?

To: Slings and Arrows

I find it very odd thatTokyo Rove was the FIRST person to know Willard “won” Iowa.

I guess not.

I would think the people counting the votes and the media would know first. And there were also reports of random precincts not counting right, but they refuse to do a recount.

No question about it: Romney and the establishment STOLE the Iowa caucuses!

29 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:29:35 AM byPAConservative1

To: Slings and Arrows

This whole Iowa Caucus stinks to high heaven! The Fox people said that the votes were lost so Romney and Rick agreed to pre-agranged vote totals?? This whole thing is Fishy…The 2012 race is looking like a Dog and Pony show to hand Romney the Nomination and get in his Admin’s good graces…I’m calling shenanigans!!!!

10 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:17:08 AM byjakerobins

You do that, chum. I’m sure the caucus Captains have been going over Freeperville with a fine tooth comb waiting to see if they should stop the polling because one or more of you dipshits didn’t like the outcome.

To: Slings and Arrows

Whole ROTTEN MESS was rigged!

Santorum is in the lead .. until greazy @$$ Rove starts ‘orchestrating’ HOW the last two

RoveIndictThis

(Four Hour Late) precincts MUST have counted wrong and .. wouldn’t you know it .. Smarmy RNC chair comes on and announces how ALL the votes had now been ‘found’ and GUESS WHAT? .. MITTENS WINS .. by the exact same amount that he had been losing by! SURPRISE!!

GARBAGE ROVE “AND FOX” are THROUGH .. as far as I am concerned!

Ki$$ My @$$ FOX NEWS!!

30 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:30:39 AM bysillipuddi (“Thieves get rich, Saints get murdered”)

CapsLock4
.

To: goldstategop

Santorum’s a weak candidate and his momentum won’t translate nationally. Why people are even rallying behind this duplicitous goofball, is beyond me.

31 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:31:30 AM byUtmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)

BanHammer
.

To: Free Vulcan

You’re wrong! If we don’t like the outcome, it must be corrupt. Can’t be that the Romney vote tally is close to the 2008 numbers, that he ran a smart campaign (something we shouldn’t pay attention to), and that a caucus process is fairly decentralized and difficult to fix. It’s corrupt! Corrupt!

Freepers can like Mitt or not (I’ve been trying to stomach him till the McCain endorsement raised my level of bile again) – but I do wish people would be a bit more sane.

54 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 3:35:12 AM bysick1 (Don’t fear the freeper)

BanHamster
.
You wish people would be more sane?More sane?
Do you freaking realize where youARE?
It’s like saying (in the midst of a scrum) that you wish hockey players weren’t so damned pushy.

To: Country Patriot

Because ROVE is the Male counterpart of Nancy Pelosi!

He’s the Representative of the California 8th Congressional district and former Speaker of the House?

I havegot to start keeping up with this stuff.

He is every bit as slimy and dis-honest as any DemonRat and the fix is in for ‘his’ candidate Romney!

Rove gave us Obama .. through Bush

What’s the matter, Bunky? Dontcha lurvs your Commander Codpiece no more? You guys used to kiss his ass like it was the Pope’s ring and you were taking your last breath.

and BY GOD .. He is going to SHOVE Romney down our throats whether we like it or not!

Well, it’s still better than having Santorum shoved up your ass.

The B@$$-TURD doesn’t really give a D@MN if Romney or Obama wins because for him .. “It’s All Good”!

He’s an Elitists and part of the “Livin Large” crowd that has Long Ago, taken power and YOU? .. You’re one of “Those” little people!

Otherwise known as “The 99%”.

Shut Up and take what they give you!

(There will never be any other way to dis-lodge people like Rove .. short of a Revolution!)

B@SS-TURDS ALL!

CapsLock2

60 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:09:59 AM bysillipuddi (“Thieves get rich, Saints get murdered”)

To: sillipuddi

Grow up sillipuddi

61 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:11:05 AM byTexas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)

I love it.
Someone on a forum where the go-to words are “DemonRATS”, “Obamination”, “Kenyan”, and worse , telling someoneelse on that forum to “grow up”.
Jim Rob delivers a post-Iowa jeremiad, gratutious mooslime-baiting, and Pee Party insanity after the fold-e-rol.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “You’re the last one, Mr. Gingrinch” edition

Good morning, sleepyheads – let me get all the party favours and confetti swept out of the airlock, and we’ll get to the more recent stuff.

First up – Jim Rob isstillthrowing a hissy fit about Romney.

Me? I can’twait for the day Romney gets the nomination. We’ll have to all work double shifts to clean the exploding head detritus off the iso chamber walls.

The day the tea party embraces Mitt Romney is the day the tea party accepts defeat
Vanity | Dec 17, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:08:08 PM byJim Robinson

First there was the Reagan Revolution, then Newt’s Republican Revolution, and now the Tea Party Revolution.

Then the Palin Phenomenon, then the Perry Phenomenon, then the Cain Trainwreck, then the Bachmann-Turner Overreach. How is this trend looking to ya so far, Jimbo?

In each successive revolution, the lovers of liberty threw off a bit more of the yoke of the oppressive ruling class to reestablish some vital part of our God given liberty and freedom.

But enough about Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos

Pro-life, small government, big defense Ronald Reagan set and accomplished the goal of bringing down the socialist Soviet Union as a threat to the world and reestablished free America as the dominate superpower. He rescued America from the hapless Jimmy Carter who had dragged the nation down into to the depths of despair.

And all this time I was thinking thatReagan was president in 1982.

Reagan taught us that our best years were indeed yet to come. He reinvigorated our economy by reducing government regulations and taxes and created a free market environment ripe for capitalism to flourish.

Um – the corporate giveaways and capital gains tax cuts occurred in 1981.

A lover of life and freedom, he fought off the socialists and merchants of doom and death at every turn

Nah – that was just him confusing movies he was in with reality.

and sparked the beginning of the decades long Reagan Economy. He was a champion of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and he delivered us from evil.

While sleeping at Cabinet meetings and ony waking to spin multiple plates on sticks while singing the Catalina Magdelina Hoopensteiner Wallendiner song, yes, yes, we get it.

Pro-life, small government, big defense Reaganite, Newt Gingrich, set and accomplished the major goal of wresting the congressional majority away from the socialist Democrats who had held it for forty years. His conservative Republican Revolution cut the taxes, cut the spending, cut the deficit, cut unemployment, blocked President Clinton’s progressive agenda, blocked HillaryCare, reformed welfare, defended life, and balanced the budget four years running, ensuring that the Reagan Economy flourished and stretched throughout his term and beyond.

Mitt Romney set goals of protecting and sustaining abortion as safe and legal in America. He sought to be more radical than Ted Kennedy in respects to “gay rights.” He swore to defend Massachusetts’ strict gun-control laws that “kept us safe” and promised not to chip away at them. He set and accomplished the goal of bringing big government healthcare solutions to his state and mandating that all formerly free citizens must purchase a government approved product or suffer a tax penalty. He loves mandates against the people.

He stated that he was an independent during Reagan-Bush and he was not returning to Reagan-Bush. And he didn’t. Instead, he delivered taxpayer funded abortion, gay marriage, gun-control, socialized healthcare, busted budgets, ruined economy, liberal activist judges and a destroyed Republican label.

It’s funny as fuck, you bunch of losers complaining aboutsomebody else destroying the “Republican Label”.

Nice of you to admit that it’s just another product with a shitty ad campaign, though.

Romney was and is demonstrably per record an anti-Reagan, pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gay agenda, pro-gun-control, anti-liberty, pro-socialist healthcare, mandate-loving, liberal judge appointing, budget busting progressive.

He is without a doubt the exact opposite of Reagan, Gingrich, the Reagan Revolution, the Republican Revolution and the Tea Party Revolution.

If the Tea Party now embraces Romney, it will have accepted defeat and surrendered to the ruling class.

There is a reason why the elite establishment GOPers are pushing the anti-Reagan Romney and rejecting the pro-life, Reaganite Newt Gingrich. And I guarantee you, it’s not in the best interest of the Tea Party or the Liberty we seek.

Not on my watch!! No Romney, no way!!

(Dec 29)But the Rasmussen Reports survey contained additional positive data for Romney. The poll showed 75 percent of those who identified themselves with the tea party movement supported Romney over Obama.

Why does the Tea Party hate America?

Rebellion is brewing!!

1 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:08:13 PM byJim Robinson
That’s just a hole in your colostomy bag.

To: Jim Robinson
If the Tea Party now embraces Romney, it will have accepted defeat and surrendered to the ruling class.

What if Romney eventually becomes the GOP nominee, and in Nov. ’12 it’s either him or another 4 years of America’s Chickens Coming Home to Roost?

DangerClose

Should the Tea Party very begrudgingly mumble some kind of wet napkin support for Romney, or write off the White House and focus on Conservative House/Senate candidates to thwart the Executive Branch?

Just askin’

24 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:26:57 PM byDTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: montyspython
What don’t you understand regarding the term ZOT?

If people get ZOT’d merely for expressing a different opinion, you don’t have to ZOT me. I’m outta here.

(Proud to be FReeper since Dec 3, 1997)

—-

Send treats to the troops…
Great becauseyou did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirelyfree service)

28 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:30:15 PM byJCG
To: JCG

bye

33 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:31:50 PM byJim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
Heh.

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

> What the Tea Party needs is to pack the Congress with like minded conservatives.

Excellent point and one that bears repeating.

I’m not spending anything on the Presidential race. The field ranges from iffy to horrible. I’m saving my bucks to spend on Congressional races where we have a chance to turn the tide.

I suggest we all do the same. Congress is where we can override Zer0 or a capitulating RINO.

50 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:40:29 PM byVictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)

I see you guys haven’t figured it out yet.The more bugfuck crazy you are, the less people will vote for you.
And whereas in most professions these would be considerable drawbacks, inchartered accountancy Tea Prty politics, they are a positive boon.

To: JCG

I remember a time not too long ago when Ann Coulter was welcomed at FR; there are still pictures of her with FR members somewhere back in the archives. But here she is, solidly in bed with Romney and the other northeastern RINO’s/liberals.

Whether its her love of Chris Cristie (She likes an obese person? Add their two weights together and divide by two and you have that of a normal person) or what, I don’t know. But she has abandoned conservative principles and now joins those who shun Newt and other Tea Party conservatives. Besides the above linked article, she appeared on O’Reilly’s show last night to hammer home her conversion. Even Rudy (whose fate on here we know) has defended Newt which shows how far out in the Boston tide flats Romney has walked.

52 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:41:41 PM byCedarDave

There you have it.
Ann Coulter – RINO!!!
More Mittens-bashing and much more after the hump.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,