Good Monday morning, gentle people! Well, the damage to the iso chamber wall has been repaired, and except for Kibitzer’s sneaker-marks on my back, no one got hurt, so let’s suit up and see what the Freepers think about their ex-golden-boy Oedipus Tex (these days).
So without further ado –“Momma showed me her fetus in a jar”.
Bush Recalls Graphic Pro-Life Moment: Mom Showed Me Her Miscarried Fetus in a Jar
The Blaze ^ | NOVEMBER 8, 2010 | Jonathon M. Seidl
Posted on Monday, November 08, 2010 2:59:18 PM byRobinMasters
Over the last week, excerpts of George W. Bush’s Monday-night interview with NBC’s Matt Lauer have shown a candid former president. But if a new excerpt obtained by the New York Post is any indication, the George W. Bush we may see tonight isn’t going to hold much back, and it could get graphic.
According to the Post, Bush will recall a detailed story about what set him down the path to becoming pro-life. That story includes his mother, Barbara, preserving and showing a young George one of her miscarried fetuses. From the Post:
(Excerpt) Read more attheblaze.com …
But why keep the baby in a jar, why not give it a proper burial?
Ho boy. Can’t wait for THIS story to get spun out of context by the libtards.
Sigh. You can’t fix stupid.
First of all, I am pro-life. My views on life were also shaped by seeing and caring for my pre-mature daughter.
But, WHO KEEPS THEIR MISCARRIAGED BABIES IN A JAR?
The media is playing us. The baby (fetus) came at home. She put it in a jar to bring it to the hospital.
Same thing happened to my son and his wife.
As several freepers point out, and as mentioned on earlier threads, Barbara Bush put the miscarried fetus in a jar to bring it to the hospital, in hopes that they could figure out what went wrong.
.
Should of kept it and showed Laura and the twins.
.
NBC via Politico ^ | 2010-11-14
Posted on Sunday, November 14, 2010 1:27:46 PM byrabscuttle385
Sen. John McCain on Sunday laughed off his wife’s appearance in a television advertisement challenging his own position on the policy barring gays from serving openly in the military,
“I respect the First Amendment rights of every member of my family,” the Arizona Republican said on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” when asked about his wife Cindy McCain’s appearance in a star-studded ad released this week by the group NOH8, in which she seemed to call for the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.
Effing facist! Your family gets first amendment rights, the rest of us get McCain-Feingold!!
RINO IDIOT!!
Come on Jim! Obey your own rule!
I only know two words for emphasis. One is effing, the other is not.
Well, I guess that clears a few things up.
Next –How oldare you guys? Twelve??
Vanity: New Name for “Murkowski” if she wins (now that we know her main funding/supporters.
jsdude | Nov 11, 2010 | Myself
Posted on Thursday, November 11, 2010 12:55:18 PM byJSDude1
PORKowski– heck her main supporters were the native tribes wanting to keep the gravy-train rolling, and the Federal Contractors (and unions).
He new royal northern Princess Name shall now, and forevermore be not Lisa Murkowski, but Liza Porkowski.
J.S.
I guess it beats “Poopy Drawers”, but not by much.
MurPORKski?
MurSOWski?
Maryland has Babs Mikulski and if Alaska getsLisa Murcowski– both will feed off the tax-payers’ teat, so we should call them the Milkcowski sisters.
Save the prefix ‘Pork’ for male pigs!
Bitch.
Foreign Policy ^ | 11/18/2010 | David Rothkopf
Posted on Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:08:20 PM bymarkomalley
Be afraid. Be very afraid. Mainstream, rock-ribbed, you-can’t-make-me-flinch Republicans are. One former leader of the party I spoke with the other night said, “We’ve never seen anything like them. The Gingrich ‘Contract with America’ revolution was mild by comparison.”Representative Bob Inglis, attacking the play to the lowest-common I.Q. of the base, said, “We’re getting what we deserve.”
America’s first know-nothings were a mid-19th century collection of nativists who dreaded “foreign” influences on the American way of life. Reactionary as they were, we may someday see them as a collection of Rhodes Scholars and Nobel Prize Winners compared to their lineal political descendents who make up the current crew of Republican extremists now flexing their recently pumped up muscles in the Congress.Knowing nothing would be an improvement for this group which defiantly embraces the wrong, the indefensible, the illogical and the absurd with their only apparent criteria for taking a position being that it feels good for their adrenaline-stoked base. Facts, science, knowledge, and reality are all seen as the tools of elites, weapons against common folks who have gotten along just fine believing in foolish ideas for all these years.
In just the past couple of weeks since the election we have seen half a dozen examples of this next generation know-nothingism, this translation of a dumbed-down zeitgeist into a new movement that might be calledSnookiism.
(Excerpt) Read more atrothkopf.foreignpolicy.com …
COMPLETE AND TOTALIGNORANCE and downrightbafoonery(sic)became a “movement” during the summer of 2008.
It was the “Barak Movement” or better known as the big, painful “BM!”
I’m still cramping from it!
