Site icon FIRST DRAFT

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – courting disaster edition

It’s the day of the 9th Circuit Court’s decision on the legality of the ban-which-isn’t-really-a-ban-but-sorta-is!

The Freeperati are ready to go! They can taste victory!

BREAKING: 9th Circuit to Issue Ruling on Trump Temporary Travel Ban at 6:30 ET

BREAKING: 9th Circuit to Issue Ruling on Trump Temporary Travel Ban at 6:30 ET
Gateway Pundit ^ | 2/9/2017 | Jim Hoft

Posted on ‎2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎17‎:‎04‎ ‎PM by sheikdetailfeather

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals announced they will issue a ruling on President Trump’s temporary travel ban.

Washington Judge James L. Robart filed a temporary restraining order on President Trump’s refugee ban from seven terror states.

**********

Fox just announced this as well.
1 posted on ‎2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎17‎:‎04‎ ‎PM by sheikdetailfeather
I thought you guys were calling Fox “fake news” these days?
To: sheikdetailfeather

In case of a loss on this issue, can Trump make other orders which are similar? Can he ban all immigration in the interestof National Security?

13 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎23‎:‎50‎ ‎PM by DrDude (To the Victor go the spoils! Kick A$$ Trump.)

Only if he wants the U.S. to declare war against a country. And the way that crazy son of a bitch is going, that just might be on his fuckit list.
To: sheikdetailfeather

I’m going to be positive and say they will support Trump’s Executive Order.My reason….They don’t want to be put down by the Supremes.

16 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎25‎:‎25‎ ‎PM by Sacajaweau
.
(tune in next week to see “sheikdetailfeather” and “Sacajaweau” call Elizabeth Warren “Pocohontas” – fun for the whole family!)
To: sheikdetailfeather

Probably 2-1 against. The Obama and Carter judges will go against Trump, the Bush one in his favor.Despite that, I do have a respect for the Carter-appointed judge that heard this case. He has the right temperament for a judge; the Obama one is a huge hack.

17 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎26‎:‎01‎ ‎PM by Trump20162020
To: sheikdetailfeather

This is about an hour away now.The answer better be: Yep, President Trump has the authority.

Or what? You’ll un-appoint them?

Robart, shut up.

22 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎28‎:‎30‎ ‎PM by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; I celebrated; I’m good. Let’s get on with the civil war now.)

“Let’s get on with the civil war now”?

How did that civil war thingy work out for you guys the LAST time you tried it?

.

To: sheikdetailfeather

Hmm Red Meat for the protesters

Or a bucket of Ice water down their skivvies?

57 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎43‎:‎23‎ ‎PM by Gasshog (Clinton denies… Expect to see a lot of this)

I hope you’re wearing thermal undershorts.
.

To: eyeamok

I know! Sickening Huh?! Why even bother to have an election for president or senators – congressman when these asses have more power and control the trashing of the constitution by making up their own laws and enforcing the people to abide by their rules!

This is so F!

59 posted on ‎2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎44‎:‎23‎ ‎PM by RoseofTexas

Fastidious? Fine? Foreordained?
Fabulous?
 .
.
Click on the “read more” with antici……
.

.
…pation!
To: DoughtyOne

I’m going to say 3-0 for us.Can’t find anything unconstitutional in the EO.

77 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎4‎:‎58‎:‎50‎ ‎PM by Sacajaweau
…or your ass, with both hands and a road map…
To: sheikdetailfeather

It will probably be a 40-60 page ruling full of dense legal jargon and lots of gibberish, upholding the stay.

The whole thing is absurd. Leftist judges tying the hands of the president of the United States and preventing him from protecting the American people.

I will be shocked if this goes the president’s way.

92 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎12‎:‎07‎ ‎PM by Deo volente (“Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives finally on November 8th.” Donald Trump)

 .
So – to sum up:
If the 9th rules one way, they’re heroes and upholding the law.
If the 9th rules another way, they’re all traitorous usurpers.
Does that pretty much cover all the bases?
 .
AND THEN…..
.
To: sheikdetailfeather

UPHELD.

Jesus, Mary and Joseph.

96 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎14‎:‎46‎ ‎PM by onyx (DONATE MONTHLY!)

 .
Um – they were refugees.
Matthew 2:13 and all that.
 .
To: sheikdetailfeather

Okay, thanks for imposing your political agenda as law, so-called asshole doing your job and ruling on the legality of Executive Branch EOs, “judges”.

103 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎18‎:‎03‎ ‎PM by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots… American Destiny!)

FIFY.

To: sheikdetailfeather

I should not be shocked but I thought even the 9th would strike this down. I guess it goes to SCOTUS.

105 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎18‎:‎22‎ ‎PM by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)

.
You guys keep screaming SCOTUS!! like the outcome instantly goes to The Darnold.
.
The Supreme Court’s not going to touch this with a ten-foot pole (even if they did, it’s a 4-4 tie), and it’ll just go back to a Seattle courtroom to die a noisy and argumentative death.
.
This was your only chance to stick it to those muzzie terrorists like this one:
.
.
SEE? He’s already wearing a suicide vest!!
.
To: exit82

It’s a judicial coup, really. Dark days indeed for our nation.

The president no longer has the authority to protect us from invasion.

Let them all come in and kill us. That’s what the court is saying today.

108 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎19‎:‎07‎ ‎PM by Deo volente (“Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives finally on November 8th.” Donald Trump)

.
.
To: sheikdetailfeather

 

FIRE THE 9TH

116 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎20‎:‎34‎ ‎PM by Read Write Repeat

.
.
One Freeper wants to wait until the news comes from a trusted source, like Breitbart :
To: sheikdetailfeather

 

BREAKING: How about if we all STFU until the official announcement is made?

127 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎24‎:‎33‎ ‎PM by Walrus (2 Thessalonians 3, 10-12)

To: trisham

 

These stupid judges who don’t understand executive branch jurisdiction just invited the Mohammed Atta copies into the country.

134 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎25‎:‎33‎ ‎PM by Read Write Repeat (FIRE THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS)

To: Truth29
Fox Business reporting that the restraining order has been upheld, no details yet.

Terrible if true. This should be about protecting Americans and the President has every right to do so.

What’s transpiring over on the left coast with these leftist judges is about protecting the liberal corrupt status quo, to h*** with American citizens being protected.

.

hork? help? hoot? hemp? ham it up?

.

.

These a-holes know if they can’t protect these illegals/immigrants coming in to this country for future votes, their corrupt statist liberal movement is dead in the future.

IMPEACH all these judges for not following our Constitution. The need for these future votes so they can hold on to power is much more important than the security of the American citizens. CONGRESS, IMPEACH THESE A-HOLES!!!!

CGato

139 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎26‎:‎37‎ ‎PM by Conservative Gato

So – you really think you have the two-thirds Senate majority needed to remove a Federal judge?  Good luck with that.
To: 11th_VA

Trump via Twitter:

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

164 posted on ‎2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎43‎:‎47‎ ‎PM by TomGuy

So courts are the answer?

Courts are no longer the answer when judges try to overthrow the Government.

165 posted on ‎2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎43‎:‎49‎ ‎PM by novemberslady

So courts AREN’T the answer? Make up your hive mind.

Thee(sic) people involved in this are criminals.

167 posted on 2‎/‎9‎/‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎45‎:‎23‎ ‎PM by novemberslady
.
.
So – it’s ON TO THE SUPREME COURT!!!
.

Trump administration won’t appeal ruling against immigration order to the Supreme Court Washington Post ^ | 10 Feb 17 | Washington Post Staff Posted on 2/10/2017, 5:13:46 PM by SkyPilot

The Trump administration can wage a legal battle in the lower courts to address more squarely whether the president’s immigration directive violates the Constitution. The White House is also mulling whether to rewrite the executive order. No matter what, the administration faces a difficult fight to restore the ban.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

1 posted on 2/10/2017, 5:13:46 PM by SkyPilot
Oops.
To: SkyPilot

Since one court already ruled in favor of the EO, why can’t Trump just ignore the obviously politically motivated edict of the 9th Circus Court of Appeals?

18 posted on 2/10/2017, 5:20:19 PM by euram

He already tried that.
Didn’t work.

To: SkyPilot

We need a 911 attack to remind us.

I am stunned by your patriotism.  And your callous stupidity.

How soon we forget.

20 posted on 2/10/2017, 5:20:42 PM by dhs12345

.
Forgetting is what Republicans do best.
.
See you good people next Monday!
.
Exit mobile version