From Holden:
Time once again to hold our noses and dive into Pony Blow’s shit. Today I detect a shift in Assministration policy.
And it’s important to realize also that we do regard a cease-fire as urgent.
Why, a scant two days ago Pony said the White House opposed an immediate cease fire.
Q On Lebanon, there seems to be two tracks that have emerged. There are those calling for an immediate cease-fire; there are those calling for a sustainable cease-fire. And the sustainable camp says there’s a risk — if you just call for an immediate, you’ll be back here in three weeks or three months. Isn’t it worth the risk if you stop innocent Israelis and Lebanese from being killed; isn’t it worth taking that risk while you try to bang out something more sustainable?
MR. SNOW: The question is whether that’s a fool’s errand, Jim. The idea that you suspend — number one, there’s a notion that somehow both sides are going to suspend, and we remain deeply skeptical that Hezbollah is going to abide by any such agreement.
Helen Thomas noticed the shift today as well.
Q Does the U.S. have a new sense of urgency about a cease-fire?
MR. SNOW: No, the U.S. has had a sense of urgency all along. Again, we dispatched diplomats to the region very shortly after this began. There is no new sense of urgency. There’s been a sense of urgency all along.
We have always been at war with Oceania, I suppose.
Obsession continues below…
Continue reading “Today on Holden’s Obsession with the Gaggle”