Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Nasty Girls edition

A quickie today good people – starting with-

Ms. Markle, if you’re nasty!

I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold!.
Real Donald Trump Twitter ^ | June 2, 2019 | President Trump

Posted on 6/2/2019, 8:46:30 AM by SMGFan

I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold! Will @CNN, @nytimes and others apologize? Doubt it!


will everyone hear this?
1 posted on 6/2/2019, 8:46:30 AM by SMGFan
To: SMGFan
Is there anything worth less on this planet than the British “royals”? 

2 posted on 6/2/2019, 8:50:36 AM by allendale (.)

So they’re ALL nasty?
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
I guess so.
To: SMGFan 

Trump supporter here who doesn’t care what he calls anyone.

That’s a shocker.

Replies to that tweet say that there is audio.

Are they lying, or is he?

7 posted on 6/2/2019, 8:55:16 AM by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)

Is this a trick question?
To: ExGeeEye
In context what she said was kinda of a “nasty” thing to say about moving to Canada if Trump won.
Should have just stood by the statement. 

10 posted on 6/2/2019, 9:00:04 AM by traderrob6

The Darnold should have stood by his statement?
You mean, instead of lying about it?
To: traderrob6
You are LYING!! He said “I didn’t know she was nasty” to a statement that she was!! 

14 posted on 6/2/2019, 9:04:09 AM by Ann Archy (Abortion……. The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)

Like I said :
TrumpSupporters (2)
Anne Elk disapproves.
To: Ann Archy
traderrob6 is now traitorrob6 

20 posted on 6/2/2019, 9:11:26 AM by Pilgrim’s Progress ( D)

To: Pilgrim’s Progress

Good grief, that was uncalled for.

We are a conservative forum that back President Trump but we also are a forum that puts a high priority on getting our facts right and in posting THE TRUTH!

You a fonny boy.

If you feel someone is a “traitor” for making sure we uphold our commitment to the truth, you’re are on the wrong forum or an imbecile….or both.

25 posted on 6/2/2019, 9:28:48 AM by traderrob6

This being Freeperville, I’m thinking that being an imbecile is kinda part of the membership requirements.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
Language, language.

To: SMGFan

In the full context, Trump did not say she was nasty.

Yes, he did.

Trump said that declaring that she would move to Canada if Trump got elected was a nasty thing to say.

No, he didn’t.

Few would disagree with that position.

21 posted on 6/2/2019, 9:11:50 AM by norwaypinesavage (Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)

You mean, “No one but Freepers would disagree with reality”.
Could the Freeperati get any more deranged?
To: SMGFan
If I say, “I didn’t know you were a son-of-a-bitch,” it’s not the same as calling you a son-of-a-bitch. Even if you are a son-of-a-bitch.
42 posted on 6/2/2019, 10:06:11 AM by Mr Ramsbotham (“God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.”)
Forget I asked.
More reality denial after the “read more” thing.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Nasty Girls edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – ” ’tis the treason ” edition

Well, that’s just great.

I’m sound asleep in a NyQuil-induced coma, and suddenly there’s a huge BANG!

Once I make sure that an airplane didn’t hit the house, I go running down to the ISO chamber, and the damned airlock door is hanging by one hinge. What the hell could have happened in Freeperville???


Trump Tower meeting with Russians ‘treasonous’, Bannon says in explosive book
The Guardian (via MSN) ^ | 1/3/2018 | David Smith

Posted on 1/3/2018, 8:37:01 AM by Incorrigible

Trump Tower meeting with Russians ‘treasonous’, Bannon says in explosive book

Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon has described the Trump Tower meeting between the president’s son and a group of Russians during the 2016 election campaign as “treasonous” and “unpatriotic”, according to an explosive new book seen by the Guardian…

..He is particularly scathing about a June 2016 meeting involving Trump’s son Donald Jr, son-in-law Jared Kushner, then campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower in New York. A trusted intermediary had promised documents that would “incriminate” rival Hillary Clinton but instead of alerting the FBI to a potential assault on American democracy by a foreign power, Trump Jr replied in an email: “I love it.”

The meeting was revealed by the New York Times in July last year, prompting Trump Jr to say no consequential material was produced. Soon after, Wolff writes, Bannon remarked mockingly: “The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor – with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers.

“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad sh- t, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately.”


“You realise where this is going,” he is quoted as saying. “This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose [senior prosecutor Andrew] Weissmann first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to f–ing Trump goes right through Paul Manafort, Don Jr and Jared Kushner … It’s as plain as a hair on your face.”


I was originally thinking this was FAKE NEWS but there’s a lot of quotes from Bannon in this article and presumably, in the book which is supposed to come out next week. I knew that Bannon was feuding with Javanka in the White House but it seems like he’d rather settle scores than help move the Conservative agenda.
1 posted on 1/3/2018, 8:37:01 AM by Incorrigible
To: Be Careful


2 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:19:07 AM by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)

That’s easy for you to say…
To: Be Careful

Looks like Bannon has turned on Trump for whatever reason.
I’m guessing he is still licking his wounds from Alabama election.

3 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:20:12 AM by tennmountainman (“Prophet Mountainman” Predicter Of All Things RINO…for a small fee.)

I told you assholes not to ever use that disgusting metaphor again.
To: Be Careful

Good thing Bannon’s not bitter because he was thrown out after helping Trump get elected.

5 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:20:27 AM by Chewbarkah

Helping The Darnold get elected? Trump now says he never even met Bannon.
To: Be Careful
The Stupid Party just loves pissing on each other.
7 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:20:50 AM by Chgogal (Sessions recused himself for shaking an Ambassador’s hand. Shameful!)
And speaking of Russian hookers….

To: Be Careful

Bannon seems insane.

As compared to WHO, exactly? Trump? That’s setting the sociopath bar pretty low.

I wonder what he thinks of the fake Russian dossier.

9 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:21:08 AM by chris37 (Take a week off racist >;-)

And speaking of Russian hookers….
Freepers fall into three camps on this, apparently:
1. 13-dimensional chess:
To: Be Careful

Not sure what to make of this blow-up but if DJT doesn’t fire off some angry tweets in Bannon’s direction I bet this is some sort of agreed upon coordinated effort.

10 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:22:09 AM by JonPreston

2. The ever-popular “fake news”:
To: Be Careful

Don’t believe these Lying Leftist Media outlets like THE GUARDIAN, that proved themselves to be intentional liars. They are presumed to be lying and we should presume what they publish is a lie. The presumption can only be rebutted with the outlet providing clear and convincing evidence they are not lying.

Why don’t we follow Trump’s lead here on FR? Let’s limit posting headlines from these wretched Lying Leftist outlets.

What will that leave you with? Posting articles from Dead Breitbart?  Heh. Got news for ya, Charlie…

It’s okay, like Trump, to read this stuff, so you know what they’re up to – just don’t post using these Lying Leftist outlets as the source which is a form of promoting their lies. Do like Trump – post the truth about the issue using a reasonably reliable source or yourself as the source. That’s how to EXPOSE the lies without promoting them.

11 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:22:25 AM by Jim 0216

3. And, the also ever-popular “shoot the messenger”:
To: tennmountainman

Is there some reason to think this “Michael Wolff” has any real quotes in his book?

14 posted on 1/3/2018, 10:23:06 AM by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)

Well, now that you ask :
(from Dead Breitbart, since you guys don’t trust those “Lying Leftist Outlets”)


It gets crazy after the jump, so… might as well JUMP!


Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – ” ’tis the treason ” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – one hit wonder edition

Hi – folks – just couldn’t get in the groove this week.

Last week’s three-post bender may have given me a bit of a hangover, so just one thread today.

However, it’s a doozy:

When will Jim Robinson banish Trump supporters from FR, like he did in 2007 with Giuliani advocates?
one man’s opinion…

Posted on ‎7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎15‎:‎15‎ ‎PM by ken5050

On 4/23/2007, Jim Robinson posted a manifesto, “Giuliani as the GOP presidential nominee would be a dagger in the heart of the conservative movement” (and a knife in the back) . The thread was subtitled, “The only difference in a Liberal Rudy Giuliani and Liberal Hillary Clinton is the fact of which bathrooms they select to use and there are some who are willing to even question that.


JimRob then proceeded to banish all the pro-Rudy posters from FR. It was a purge of fairly epic proportions.Prior to that, there had been considerable support for Rudy on FR. A few months earlier, Rudy had actually placed second in a straw poll on FR. The “Rudybots” as they were termed, were actively posting pro Giuliani threads pretty much 24/7.

What finally led Jim Robinson to take this step were Giuliani’s comments in support of the Roe v. Wade decision at the May 3rd GOP presidential debate.

Prior to that, Rudy had increasingly come under the microscope at FR. The “Giuliani Truth File” was a stand alone category on the FR home page. There was an ongoing “STOP RUDY NOW News & Information Thread” that was featured.

Now let me state a few things for the record.

1. Jim Robinson is absolutely correct that a pro-choice position is anathema to FReepers. We may disagree on other topics, but this is our hill, on which we will all stand and die together. Rudy could not be the GOP nominee for that reason alone.

2. Many questioned whether Jim Rob should take such a drastic course of action..banning hundreds of people. Some felt that it would be better to engage in ongoing debate and discussion among ourselves. That was never the question. Indeed, it was never up for debate. I lost several good friends, of many years standing, that day, but I never questioned his absolute right to take that course of action. It is his website; he is free to run it as he sees fit, and those who can’t abide with his decisions have the freedom to go elsewhere.

Now that we have that out of the way, let us turn our attention to “The Donald.”

Trump is NOT a conservative.

He is not even a Republican. He was a registered Democrat from 2001-2009.

He has given far more to Democrats than to Republicans.

For most of his life, he was strongly, and proudly pro-choice. IOW, he was OK with killing babies.

He will NOT pledge to support the eventual Republican nominee, and will not promise to NOT run a third-party race.

What Trump IS, is a narcissistic, megalomaniacal, bloviating asshole. It is beyond me how so many self-proclaimed conservatives here at FR could be supporting this clown. He is utterly unfit to serve as NYC Sanitation Commissioner, let alone as President.

That is of course their absolute right to do so.

But what I fail to understand is why Jim Robinson has not as yet banished all the “Trumpsters” from FR? What, pray tell, makes “the Donald” acceptable here, whereas Giuliani was not?

1 posted on 7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎15‎:‎15‎ ‎PM by ken5050
To: ken5050


2 posted on‎7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎16‎:‎50‎ ‎PM by Eddie01 (Liberal’s lie about everything all the time)

To: ken5050

Jim seems to be quite supportive of Trump, if you have been paying attention.

3 posted on 7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎17‎:‎21‎ ‎PM by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)

To: ken5050

You’ve apparently missed JR’s recent “Go Trump, Go Cruz” posts.

5 posted on 7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎18‎:‎02‎ ‎PM by EDINVA

To: ken5050

Because Trump is doing a wonderful service.

He’s an awful candidate and I oppose him becoming the R nominee.

However, his CANDIDACY is wonderful. He’s making the Republicans address real issues. He’s changing the dialogue. His refreshing honesty and directness has yielded ever-increasing poll numbers, and may give a lesson to people I do support (Ted Cruz).

I am against banning Trump supporters at this time. The man is doing a world of good.

7 posted on 7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎4‎:‎18‎:‎47‎ ‎PM by Lazamataz (“In a very short period of time, these will be the good old days.” — unknown Freeper, 2015)

There’s about 50 more “Who do you think you are” and “I loves Trump cause he blurts out shit that my id whispers to me constantly” stuff. If you want more of it, just go back and read Laz’s post 50 more times…
To: ken5050

While I agree with you on Trump – who is not a conservative and has made other attempts at running for office where he washed out because it was clear that he was just a mouth with no mind, and not even a conservative mouth. – I don’t think JR eliminated Rudy supporters as such, but just because they were such pests.

Trump posters are falling into the pest category, btw.

82 posted on 7‎/‎25‎/‎2015‎ ‎5‎:‎02‎:‎18‎ ‎PM by livius

More pest-ilence after the jump…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – one hit wonder edition”