A quickie today good people – starting with-
Ms. Markle, if you’re nasty!
I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold!.
Real Donald Trump Twitter ^ | June 2, 2019 | President Trump
Posted on 6/2/2019, 8:46:30 AM by SMGFan
I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold! Will @CNN, @nytimes and others apologize? Doubt it!
**************will everyone hear this?
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
Trump supporter here who doesn’t care what he calls anyone.
To: ExGeeEyeIn context what she said was kinda of a “nasty” thing to say about moving to Canada if Trump won.
To: Ann Archytraderrob6 is now traitorrob6
20 posted on 6/2/2019, 9:11:26 AM by Pilgrim’s Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Pilgrim’s Progress
Good grief, that was uncalled for.
We are a conservative forum that back President Trump but we also are a forum that puts a high priority on getting our facts right and in posting THE TRUTH!
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
In the full context, Trump did not say she was nasty.
To: SMGFanIf I say, “I didn’t know you were a son-of-a-bitch,” it’s not the same as calling you a son-of-a-bitch. Even if you are a son-of-a-bitch.
To: Ann Archy
You are an angry little monkey aren’t you.
After more research I have come to belive that Trump intended to state that Markle’s statement concerning moving to Canada if he was elected was “nasty” and not that she was nasty.
But the statement “I didn’t know she was nasty” could certainly and honestly be take to mean calling her nasty. At the very least arguably interpreted to mean either.
A lie is defined as “to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive.”
First, it’s simply my belief NOW that what Trump INTENDED to relay was that’s it was Markle’s statement and not her that was “nasty” but to categorize my initial conclusions as an “untrue statement” is erroneous. It may or may not be as it’s obviously open to interpretation.
Second, from initially listening to the audio, it certainly left me with the impression that he indeed meant she was or at least could be “nasty”. Bottom line, I definitively had NO intention to deceive anyone.
Unfortunately people like you are just as bad as the raving lunatics on the DU other than you happen to be at least on the correct side of the political spectrum. Calling people names that you disagree with, believing there motives to be malevolent just because they don’t jibe with your opinions. Frankly, your hyperbolic mindless ad hominem characterizations embarrass not only you but many of us that politically stand for the same things.