Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

As I’m sure you all know by now, President Slurpy McNearbeer awoke feeling woozy today. Short-termerDan Bartlett explains. MR. BARTLETT: Well, the President woke up this morning and wasn’t feeling very well. He’s not sure if it was something he ate last night, or just — or this morning, for that matter — but not feeling completely up to snuff. [snip] Q How seriously would you characterize what he has right now? MR. BARTLETT: Not serious. I mean, like I said, just being very — taking a precautionary step by allowing himself to rest and recuperate a bit. Like I … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With [Yesterday’s] Gaggle

Dana Peroxide presided over a brief gaggle aboard Air Force One yesterday and though she wanted to talk about the G8 Summit the gagglers were all about Scooter. Chimpy Is Still Looking For Ways To Avoid Talking About The Plame Outing Q Any reaction to the sentencing for Scooter Libby? MS. PERINO: Yes, Dan Bartlett and Chief of Staff Josh Bolten informed the President right after take off — as you know, that news came in just as we were taxiing — so they informed the President. The President said that he felt terrible for the family, especially his wife … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With [Yesterday’s] Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

You Can Almost SmellPony Blow’s Flopsweat Today Q Tony, Judge Walton today decided that he will release the letters that were written in the Libby case. When — MR. SNOW: These are the letters — by background — on behalf of Scooter Libby, these are — yes. Q On behalf of him and those who weighed in, saying that he shouldn’t have a stiff sentence. When they are released, will we find out that the President and Vice President wrote letters? MR. SNOW: Well, I think you’ll just have to wait and see. I actually do not know who wrote … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With [Friday’s] Gaggle

OK, I know I’m late with this, but I don’t get paid to blog on holidays. Apparently, Pony Blow, Dana Peroxide and Tony Farto all had better things to do Friday so we were stuck with Snott Stanzel. Snott Gets Helenized Q Since no Justice Department official has been forthcoming, who drew up the list of the attorneys — the prosecutors to be fired? MR. STANZEL: Well, I think, Helen, that’s a subject that’s been covered exhaustively on hearings on the Hill — Q Okay. Tell me, I’m sorry, I have not read who — MR. STANZEL: I will allow … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With [Friday’s] Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

We get Pony Blow today.

Overplaying the Gonzales Kerfuffle

Q Tony, in the past we’ve heard that some Cabinet members who have been in the midst of trouble, in the midst of controversy, have gone to the President and asked him, should they resign, and the President has declined.

MR. SNOW: April, you are so overplaying this.

Q No, I’m not. Don’t go there. (Laughter.) No, seriously. The AG —

MR. SNOW: Seriously, you are really overplaying this.

Q No, I’m not. I’m asking, has the Attorney General — this Attorney General gone to the President and asked him, should he resign?

MR. SNOW: I have no knowledge of that. I would doubt it.

Q Why would you doubt it?

MR. SNOW: Because.

Q We know Rumsfeld had asked the President —

MR. SNOW: There is no question of the President’s support. You really are — you’re over —

Q I am not.

MR. SNOW: No, you are. Trust me.

Q I know of another Secretary who asked the President —

MR. SNOW: I understand, but you’re overreaching. I’m trying to be helpful.

The Set-Up

Q Tony, I want to have one more question about the Attorney General here. Is there any thought inside the White House — the President has showed enormous loyalty to the Attorney General — is there any thought inside the White House that the Attorney General has not shown the same degree of loyalty to the President, because it should be apparent to him at this point that he is damaging the President and that he should go?

MR. SNOW: No. No, what you’re saying is that if you have political opponents who say nasty things about a Cabinet member, that they ought to go.

[snip]

Q Let me just follow that. If you widen out — however, it becomes very clear that the Attorney General has become a distraction. And so that, again, it is incumbent upon him to say, Mr. President, I don’t want to be a distraction to you anymore.

MR. SNOW: I don’t think he’s a distraction.

The Kill

Q Tony, if the Alberto Gonzales situation is not a distraction to the President, is that because his advisors have not brought it to his attention?

MR. SNOW: Again, if you take a look at the — the question is, has this changed the way in which the Department of Justice functions? Has it affected any core function? The answer is, no.

Q So have his advisors brought it to his attention?

MR. SNOW: The President doesn’t need advisors to draw to his attention the fact that the Attorney General has been called to Capitol Hill and other people who have worked for the Attorney General have been called to Capitol Hill. He understands these things.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today I found an unwelcome link at the White House Briefing page:  Press Gaggle by Tony Fratto Tony Fatso? You have got to be kidding me. They brought in the fourth string for the morning gaggle? What’s wrong, was Dana Peroxide out torturing her dog again? Was Snott Stanzelbusy updating his Windows MySpaces page? Tony Fatso (Nice mug shot, Tony!) gives the bottom of the barrel a bad name. Make That The Bipartisan Bottomless Bag, Tony Q Senators Schumer and Feinstein are going to introduce a no confidence resolution for Attorney General Gonzales next week, the Senate is going to … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Pony Blow Was Playing DumbToday

Q Is the Wolfowitz saga going to play itself out today, or is it — what do you know about that?

MR. SNOW: I don’t know — again, we’ve made our position known. We know there are meetings ongoing. But I don’t have anything new.

Q And they asked for an adjournment for some discussion. Do you have any idea what that was about?

MR. SNOW: No, I’d refer all questions back there. I don’t — I mean, we’re led to believe they are going to be meeting further today, but I don’t have anything new.

[snip]

Q This morning you said there were a lot of conversations going on regarding Wolfowitz.

MR. SNOW: Regarding what?

Q Wolfowitz. Are administration officials involved in those negotiations?

MR. SNOW: Again, I’m just — you’re going to have to — look, let me put it this way — we do have a representative on the board of governors, it is the Treasury Secretary. But beyond that, I’m not going to get into anything that may be transpiring.

Q Are you denying, then, that the administration is negotiating some kind of a deal —

MR. SNOW: I’m not discussing it, yea or nay.

He Might Also Have Been LyingJust A Little Bit

The World Bank’s executive board has dismissed a proposal floated by the Bush administration aimed at delivering the resignation of the institution’s embattled president, Paul D. Wolfowitz, according to senior officials at the bank.

The proposal, pressed with foreign finance ministers by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., would have had the bank’s board reprimand but not fire Wolfowitz for engineering and covering up a substantial raise for his girlfriend, with the bank expressly sharing some of the blame for the ethics controversy. Following that, the Bush administration would have agreed to replace Wolfowitz, said administration sources who spoke on condition they not be named, citing the sensitivity of the issue.

But the board rejected that formulation in discussions last night and today, the sources said. The board is deliberating over a report by an investigating committee that finds Wolfowitz breached his contract, broke ethics rules and undermined the reputation of the bank. The board’s leadership was hoping to resolve the matter and take action — perhaps declaring a lack of confidence in Wolfowitz or even firing him — by the end of today.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today Pony Blow Is Worried That The Military Will Run Out Of Money And Our Troops WIll Be Stranded In Iraq

Q What is the total of the transfers, the financial cost of all the transfers in the last 100 days? And also, Tony, you talk about planning beyond the fourth quarter, and you said that production could be shut down. Could this ultimately — if the stalemate were to continue for months down the road —

MR. SNOW: If the stalemate continues for months, the funds are cut off. You’ve got a military that’s cut off, period.

Q Okay, a military that’s cut off — would that mean some of the military may be coming back home, because they’re cut off?

MR. SNOW: Darling, you don’t have the money to send them home. That also costs money. Total transfers right now $4.918 billion.

Q Four point nine —

MR. SNOW: It’s not as if everybody just has frequent flier passes, say, hey, war is over, send me back for free. That also costs money. It literally affects everything, including the movement of forces in and out of the theater of battle.

Q So no hypothetical —

MR. SNOW: I’m not going to get into a hypothetical, because —

Q No, but you did say that they were stuck there. There’s no money to bring them back home, and then there’s no money to fight the war, so what happens?

MR. SNOW: Well, again, that’s not going to happen. You know that that’s not going to happen, I know it’s not going to happen, Congress knows it’s not going to happen. They’re going to get this fixed.

Nice Knife Work There, Alberto

Q Going to the Attorney General and the U.S. prosecutors that were dismissed. Today Mr. Gonzales said that the recommendations reflect the views of the Deputy Attorney General, Paul McNulty. He signed off on the names. Isn’t the Attorney General effectively pushing blame to the official who is heading out the door?

MR. SNOW: No, because he supports all the personnel actions. There’s nothing to blame.

Q Suggesting, though, that he was not a responsible party by saying he signed off on the names, they reflect the view —

MR. SNOW: Look, what he understands is he’s delegated authority for people within the Department of Justice to make those decisions, which he supports, and he’s simply stating how it worked in terms of the assignment of responsibilities.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today We Learned About Dick Cheney’s Extra-Sensory Perception

Q The Vice President said in a question-and-answer on the record today, on the airplane, I guess, that he sensed a greater urgency in the Iraqi government than he had sensed before. We’ve been led to believe that they were pretty urgent about going forward for a long time.

MR. SNOW: Yes.

Q What does that statement say to you?

MR. SNOW: It says to me that they continue to think that there’s a sense of urgency and they’re redoubling their efforts.

[snip]

Q But he didn’t seem to get any real commitments on the part of the Iraqis. I mean, to say you get a greater sense of urgency at this time, months and months after we’ve been told by the President and others that they were committed to moving fast —

MR. SNOW: What the Vice President said is he’s not going to tell you what were in those private conversations. He said that the reason they’re private is that they are confidential. He did not say that he didn’t see a difference. He simply wasn’t going to read them out, anymore than he was going to read out his personal conversations with his meetings with heads of state elsewhere.

Q But do you think he’s gotten commitments on not taking a vacation? I mean, why wouldn’t he read that out? I mean, it seems like it’s not there. He essentially said it’s not there.

MR. SNOW: Well, no. I just — no, he didn’t say that.

The Schizo Assministration

Q Tony, we have Vice President Cheney issuing a stern warning to the Iranians from the deck of an aircraft carrier. Today the Iranian President responds by threatening severe retaliation if the U.S. attacks it. We also have both the U.S. and the Iranians saying they are willing to talk to each other in Baghdad. How can you explain the contradictory, if not schizophrenic, state of U.S. diplomacy with regard to Iran?

MR. SNOW: Schizophrenic?

Q Certainly contradictory.

MR. SNOW: No, I don’t think so. For one thing, what the Vice President — the Vice President did not threaten to attack another country. So what you’re doing is you’re getting a reaction to a threat that was not made on the part of the Iraqi [sic] government.

Number two, U.S. policy has always been the same, which is to use the diplomatic pressure available to you to encourage good behavior on the part of the Iranians.

[snip]

Q But what’s the use of ratcheting up the temperature in the Gulf with that kind of symbolic threat, or warning, at least, of the — when you want their cooperation in Iraq?

MR. SNOW: No, I don’t think — again, you read it as ratcheting it up. The Vice President was pointing out that under international law, you do, in fact, have the right of freedom of movement.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Press Gaggle by Snott Stanzel  Wait a minute, who the hell is “Snott Stanzel”? Where’s Pony Blow? Did Dana Peroxide have to go bail her husband out of jail again? Turns out that Snott Stanzel is a 34-year-old Iowa State graduate who Pony Blow hired back in October. Hey, he has his own Windows Live Spaces page! He must be one of them hip members of Generation Next I’ve heard so much about. Anyway, back to the Gaggle — where it seems Chimpy knows that everybody hates him now. Q Is the President going to talk about Iraq today at … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Suddenly, It’sGame Time

Q One last thing about — in connection with the Vice President’s trip. On board Air Force Two yesterday, senior administration officials said of the trip, and the message, “We’ve got to get this work done. It’s game time.” — what does that suggest about the first four years of the war? Is it that the administration is just now saying that that was a scrimmage and now it’s game time? What does that mean?

MR. SNOW: I think that’s simply — it gets back to what the President is saying. In some ways, there may be perceptions of two different clocks, Baghdad and Washington. The President said, you’ve got to speed up the clock. It is a matter of realizing that there have been a lot of efforts now. We’ve been working on this joint way forward in Iraq. You are getting results in a number of areas. We have been talking and working with the Iraqis on political, economic, and other reform.

Helen Is Unhappy With A General Setting Foreign Policy For The Country

Q The President emphasized September and he emphasized General Petraeus’ report — all week you moved away from September. Is it a real important date for us to decide things?

MR. SNOW: I think what the President is saying is —

Q Does he know that we have civilian rule in this country?

MR. SNOW: Yes. Do you?

Q I do.

MR. SNOW: Okay, good.

Q I’m not waiting for Petraeus.

MR. SNOW: Well, he does understand, however, that — oh, so you’re thinking what he’s doing — no, I’m not even going to get into that. What people want is a detailed accounting of what’s going on in Iraq. And so —

Q But you guys set the date for September, you keep —

MR. SNOW: No, I think he actually — General Petraeus originally mentioned that, and I don’t want to try to — he mentioned the month, and so —

Q Is it important, or not?

MR. SNOW: Look, what’s important is for people to continue to take a look — May is important; June is important; July is important; August is important; September is important. It’s —

Q You’re telling people to hold off on their opinions —

MR. SNOW: No, what I’m telling people is to keep their eyes open to the situation as it develops.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today Pony Blow gaggles with FEMA Director Dave Paulison by his side. The Governor Didn’t Say What She Said, OK? Q Could I start the questioning to Director Paulison? Is the National Guard stretched too thin to deal with natural disasters in the country? DIRECTOR PAULISON: No, not at all. [snip] MR. SNOW: It’s also important with regard to this to get the facts straight, because I think there’s been a narrative that equipment was not available. It was. The Governor has said so. She has said so on the record. It didn’t make it into some newspapers this morning, … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

What Will The ChildrenThink?Pony Blow Admits He Lied About Kansas!

Q And you said this morning that if you don’t request it, you’re not going to get it. Is there —

MR. SNOW: Well, it turns out I’ve had subsequent conversations, and what happened was, she actually did get — there was not a formal request, but they’d had conversations. So on the basis of those, the government began moving things proactively.

[snip]

Q This morning you said the only thing the Kansas Governor requested was FM radios. Has she, in fact, requested more now?

MR. SNOW: I believe so. Let me take a quick look. I think there are a couple of other items that have been requested and supplied. Let’s see, the state has requested a mobile command center, an urban search and rescue task force, a mobile office building, 40 two-way radios, and coordination calls between Kansas, Texas and Oklahoma, to determine if they need extra Black Hawks; Kansas has six, Texas and Oklahoma have offered to make available another five to six if necessary. So those are the things that the state has requested, that FEMA has provided.

He’s Still Not Ready To Own Up To The Fact That Chimpy’s Vanity War Has Crippled The Guard

Q Tony, how much is the disaster response effort impacted by the war?

MR. SNOW: I think they’re separate issues. The war —

Q Aren’t they shared resources?

MR. SNOW: They’re shared resources, but on the other hand, it is not something that you can’t — just as in a time of war, the Pentagon plans for more than one conflict at a time, you have to be able to do more than one thing at a time. So the fact that you have people deployed in a time of war to protect Americans is important; but at the same time, you also maintain your capability of dealing with domestic concerns.

Q There is no impact?

MR. SNOW: I don’t know. I don’t know how you measure. How would I measure — I’m not being snarky in giving — I just don’t know how you measure that.

Q You look at the available equipment and you see how much of it is overseas.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Let’s Open WithThe Question Of The Day

Q Tony, I have a definitional question.

MR. SNOW: Oh, good.

Q Is it possible that some of what the colonists did might be construed by some as terrorism and insurgency?

MR. SNOW: I don’t know, you’ll have to ask them.

Pony Doesn’t Understand The Meaning Of “Political”

Q Given that, as you said, the Queen doesn’t play a political role in Great Britain, was there a particular reason why the President gave such a political speech?

MR. SNOW: The President — was it a political speech, or was it one, in fact, reflecting the closeness and the importance of principle?

Q It was a political speech. (Laughter.)

MR. SNOW: To you it was.

Q I think it was a political speech. It spoke a great deal about the war, the war on terror, the war in Iraq. The Queen’s speech reflected something that was not political. When you compare the two, and the tone of the two, one was political and one was not.

MR. SNOW: As a matter of fact, if you take a look — one, two, three, four, five, six, seven — eight paragraphs, there are nine paragraphs — I believe one referred to it, and there was nothing directly mentioning Iraq, although there was talk about democracy, liberty, defending liberty against tyranny and terror. It mentions killing the innocent to advance a hateful ideology, whether it’s in New York, London, Kabul or Baghdad.

You may call that political, but that is, in fact, a reflection of what’s going on the world.

[snip]

Q You would say it’s not political.

MR. SNOW: No. No. I would say it is not political.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today We Learned That Dana Peroxide Is Subpoena Bait

Q Dana, a Newsweek article reports that a couple of months ago Karl Rove was involved in some meetings where Justice Department officials were preparing for testimony. Did the meeting happen? Was Mr. Rove there? And was it appropriate for him to be there?

MS. PERINO: I’m so confused by this, because Kyle — in the first batch of documents that went out on March 13th, Kyle Sampson’s documents included a meeting — an announcement about a meeting that happened early in March. I’m not going to tell you who the participants are of internal White House meetings, but I will tell you, it is not at all unusual, nor is it inappropriate, for people at the White House to meet with members of the administration before they are going up to testify in front of Congress. And at the urging of the White House — we were asking the Justice Department to be fully responsive to the Congress so that we could help get them the answers that they need.

Q You don’t think it creates an appearance of everybody getting their story straight?

MS. PERINO: What I think is that — what it appears is that anytime Karl Rove’s name is mentioned is that there’s some sort of nefarious action. I will tell you that, having worked on that issue intimately, and the whole time we were in Latin America, we were urging the Justice Department to be responsive to the Congress. That is not unusual, and we would have done that with any agency.

Q Yes, but there was a sense at the time that the Justice Department, I believe from the podium it was suggested often that the Justice Department needs to get its — all of its story in line, straight, and get it in, settled up to the Hill, but that it was the Justice Department’s problem to solve, which would be different than having meetings at the White House to talk about any kind of strategy about how you’re going to testify.

MS. PERINO: Urging members of the administration to make sure that they’re responsive to members of Congress is not at all inappropriate. In fact, I think we would be remiss if we hadn’t done so.

Q That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that there were meetings at the White House about coordinating a strategy for how to deal with it. That’s not exactly the kind of —

MS. PERINO: Look, I was at that meeting, and I will tell you that the way you’re describing it, in terms of coordinating some sort of message, was not the case. It was encouraging them to make sure that all the information got out quickly so that the members of Congress could have what they needed so that we could move on from that story.

Q You were there?

MS. PERINO: I was there.

Q Was Karl there?

MS. PERINO: I’m not going to comment on anybody else; I will speak for myself.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Hmmmmm… Do I Detect A Change In The Assministration’s Rhetoric Regarding The Urgent Need For War Funds?

Q If it takes until Memorial Day, the end of the month, what’s the impact on the military? You’ve been making the case every day that time is running out.

MR. SNOW: Well, we’ve made the case that it is certainly not constructive to drag this out, but I’m not going to try to play — we’re not going to answer subjunctive questions.

[snip]

Q Will the military have difficulty if they don’t get the —

MR. SNOW: Again, that is a question properly aimed at the Pentagon. But also, as you know, the Pentagon is loathe to get into making characterizations on operational matters. Let’s just put it this way: We know that already there’s a requirement of transferring money from certain accounts to others to make sure that we have full funding. That will continue to be the case until the emergency supplemental has been passed. We think it is preferable to have all accounts funded fully.

IOKIYTIP*

*It’s OK If Your The Iraqi Parliament

Q The President has sometimes been critical of Congress when it takes a recess when there’s important pending business. Does he have a view about the Iraqi parliament planning to take a recess?

MR. SNOW: Well, this is something that I think is probably still under discussion in Iraq, as well. We’re not commenting.

[snip]

Q Tony, why aren’t you commenting about the possibility that the Iraqi parliament is going to take two months off this summer with key legislation pending? I mean, even if they are considering this, isn’t that an affront to this administration?

MR. SNOW: Why don’t you let the Iraqi parliament go ahead and work through and have debates, even though — let’s just let them go ahead and consider the matter. And in two months, if this is a really pressing matter, we can discuss it then.

Q If I could follow here, I mean, it’s really kicking up a lot of dust on Capitol Hill. As you’re trying to get this supplemental worked out in negotiations, doesn’t this hurt the whole process?

MR. SNOW: Again, let’s see what happens.

Q Are you hearing something different than what we’re hearing, that they’re at least considering it?

MR. SNOW: Well, I’m aware of the news reports, but I also am aware that you’ve got an Iraqi government right now, where we are working with them on a whole host of issues — there was some discussion this morning about the fact that you have now — the Council of Ministers have passed on to the Council of Representatives an oil law. And there is a lot of activity going on in the country, and I just think at this particular juncture, trying to draw broad conclusions about something that is rumored possibly to happen in two months is a great parlor exercise, but it is not a particularly useful diplomatic exercise.

Q But if somebody is talking about it on the ground —

MR. SNOW: Everybody talking about it — surely you all will talk about this. No. (Laughter.)

Q Doesn’t it speak to political will? At a time when people are questioning, can the Iraqi government actually meet political benchmarks, doesn’t that, though, speak to the will of the Iraqi government? Does it have the political will to move —

MR. SNOW: I’m telling you, let’s just wait and see what happens over the next couple of months. We have had many debates like this in this country. You may recall when people have gone on vacations before elections, when they haven’t passed budgets, when things have been pushed off until the very end of the year. I don’t want to be doing equations here, but the fact is the legislative process is something that you have to contend with. This is a democracy.

[snip]

Q Try this one more time. Ambassador Crocker has said publicly he’s raised concerns about the Iraqi parliament taking a recess for two months. Why wouldn’t the President raise such concerns with Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki in his frequent video teleconferences?

MR. SNOW: Well, again, I’m not going to disclose to you — we give you readouts of the teleconferences. What I’ve said is, the Ambassador has made his view known — views known, and there is a debate going on in Iraq. So let’s see how the Iraqis handle this. That’s all I’m saying.

Q Why won’t the White House weight in?

MR. SNOW: Because you know what? Iraq — we respect Iraq as a sovereign government, and we are not going to sit around and lecture them on those particular matters. We will make our views known. And the Iraqis also are making their views known. Again, there’s a vigorous debate about this, which is why I would suggest that you let these things sort of play out and see what happens.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

An Excellent Question For Pony Blow FromToday’s Gaggle

Q Did the President read the bill before he vetoed it?

MR. SNOW: The President — we have had plenty of time to review the bill.

Compromise Is For The Other Guys

Q Can you talk about the spirit of these meetings today, then? Is the spirit to compromise? I know you’re saying you won’t compromise on this, that or the other —

MR. SNOW: Let me put it this way —

Q — he’s listening, but is he willing to compromise in some way to get this through?

MR. SNOW: The President is going to be working with Congress to get something done. Again, you may — maybe I wasn’t listening, but I haven’t heard the question asked of congressional leaders. The fact is, both sides have to work together.

Pony’s Dodging Left An Opening For Helen

Q We want to know if there’s going to be any give, any give out of the President — from the rule of the people to move out of this war.

MR. SNOW: Yes, we want to move out of this war by succeeding.

Q Violence escalating every day.

Q Tony —

MR. SNOW: Wait a minute, let me stop. Helen, the people have been — if you take a look at what’s been going on recently, there have been a number of al Qaeda attacks that had have the — that have killed innocents —

Q Did every Iraqi attack —

MR. SNOW: No, but if you take a look at the MO of al Qaeda — bombing attacks — as a matter of fact, you’ve seen some reports, for instance, of Iraqis, even those who are opposed to the government, going after foreign fighters. There’s a real and recognizable problem there, and it has to be dealt with. So those who say we need to fight al Qaeda, part of what we’re trying to do is to build greater capability there.

Q We brought them into Iraq.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Hell, we’re stuck with Dana Peroxide again today. Did You Know That The “Coalition” Does Not Include The United States Of America? MS. PERINO: One number you might want is, since 2003, 143,336 cumulative coalition troops have served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Q Served in all of these — in Iraq and Afghanistan? MS. PERINO: Cumulative coalition troops, right. Q From how many countries? MS. PERINO: I know it’s around 30 nations now, but I think at one time it was up to — Q Just in Iraq? MS. PERINO: I think it’s Iraq and — I think it’s total, … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Pony Blow Is Back

Q Where ya been? (Laughter.)

MR. SNOW: Just hanging out. Thank you so much, it’s great to be back.

Q We thought Rove double-deleted you. (Laughter.)

Pony Must Be Feeling Pretty Good As He Took A Shot AtTim Russert [scroll down] To Start Things Rolling

MR. SNOW: Okay, first, we can cut cameras now, because we have cut to the other portion of our thing.

As far as the Iran supplemental, we have not. So the real question —

Q Iraq.

MR. SNOW: I mean, the Iraq supplemental. Yes. The Iran supplemental would be entirely different. (Laughter.)

Q Did we leave the cameras on? (Laughter.)

Q How much is Iran — (Laughter.)

MR. SNOW: As one famous host said, “I-r-a-k.”

Q Oooh!

Q Oh, we love that. (Laughter.)

Q Are we still rolling? (Laughter.)

Weenergate

Q Has the administration been notified of anyone else who might be resigning, relating to the D.C. madam?

MR. SNOW: Not that I’m aware of.

Q Does the President have any opinion on the departure of Randall Tobias?

MR. SNOW: Well, he’s saddened by it, but it was the appropriate thing to do.

[snip]

Q Just one quick one. You said — back to Randall Tobias. If, as he says, he just got massages, why is it the proper thing for him to do to resign?

MR. SNOW: Well, he apparently thought that it was the proper thing to do, and I will not get into details because I don’t know them. Whew! (Laughter.)

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With [Yesterday’s] Gaggle

The afternoon gaggle yesterday was really a response to Senate passage of the emergency supplemental appropriation for Chimpy’s Vanity War in Iraq.

Dana Opens By Spitting Fire

MS. PERINO: Eighty days after President Bush submitted his troop funding bill, the Senate has now joined the House in passing defeatist legislation that insists on a date for surrender, micro-manages our commanders and generals in combat zones from 6,000 miles away, and adds billions of dollars in unrelated spending to the fighting on the ground.

The Gagglers Spit Back

Q Dana, though, last year it was a Republican Congress that took 118 days to get you a war funding bill, and the White House didn’t complain that it took a long time. So why is 70 or 80 —

MS. PERINO: There’s a key difference. One is that — a couple of things. We did not provide the Congress the detail in the request that we did this year with the budget. In fact, we provided it to them later than when the budget came out. This year, we heard their complaints, and we got the request for the supplemental to them the same day as we sent up the regular budget of the United States.

In addition to that, there were some complaints, but the major key difference is, last year we knew that eventually — that we were going to get a bill that the President could sign.

Q The point is, though, that it took 40 days longer for a Republican Congress to pass a war funding bill, and the money still got to the troops in the field. So isn’t this — aren’t you exaggerating the effect on the troops in the field? Last year it took 40 days longer.

MS. PERINO: No, I don’t think that we’re exaggerating at all.

Another Logic Problem For Dana

Q The President has accused the Democrats of holding up funding to the troops. But it’s the President’s veto that will, effectively, put the funding — stop the funding in its tracks. So if this is so urgent doesn’t he at least share some of the blame?

MS. PERINO: No, Matt —

Q — some of the blame for the holdup, for failing to have his White House and his fellow Republicans achieve a workable compromise with the Democrats?

MS. PERINO: No. For several weeks the Democrats have known that if the bill, in its current form, is sent to him, that he would veto it. They’ve also said that they don’t plan on cutting off funds for the troops. And given that, since they don’t have and they know they don’t have the votes to override the President’s veto, it is their responsibility to send the President a bill that he can sign.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With [Yesterday’s] Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Dana Peroxide channelled Little Scottie today.

Q But did the President actually see the testimony?

MS. PERINO: He got regular updates from us while we were on the road — we were on the road that day, on the way to Ohio.

Q So how can he say he has increased confidence if he got updates from other people? So he didn’t actually see the testimony, himself, because —

MS. PERINO: He got updates from us, and I think he saw some news coverage of it later that day.

Q But as Jim noted, I mean, Arlen Specter yesterday said that it was “very, very damaging to his own credibility.” So what did the President see — well, he didn’t see the testimony, but what did he hear that he —

MS. PERINO: What the President knows is that the Attorney General answered honestly, truthfully and was as responsive to Congress as he could possibly be during hours of testimony and in turning over all the documents, and then making people that work for him available to the Congress in order to answer their questions.

Flashback to September 29, 2003:

Q All right. Let me just follow up. You said this morning, “The President knows” that Karl Rove wasn’t involved. How does he know that?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I’ve made it very clear that it was a ridiculous suggestion in the first place. I saw some comments this morning from the person who made that suggestion, backing away from that. And I said it is simply not true. So, I mean, it’s public knowledge. I’ve said that it’s not true. And I have spoken with Karl Rove —

Q But how does —

MR. McCLELLAN: I’m not going to get into conversations that the President has with advisors or staff or anything of that nature; that’s not my practice.

Q But the President has a factual basis for knowing that Karl Rove —

MR. McCLELLAN: I said it publicly. I said that —

Q But I’m not asking what you said, I’m asking if the President has a factual basis for saying — for your statement that he knows Karl Rove —

MR. McCLELLAN: He’s aware of what I’ve said, that there is simply no truth to that suggestion. And I have spoken with Karl about it.

Q Does he know whether or not the Vice President’s Chief of Staff, Lewis Libby —

MR. McCLELLAN: If you have any specific information to bring to my attention — like I said, there has been nothing that’s been brought to our attention.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Oooooh! Dana hates thatquestion. Q Is he doing any interviews on potential new candidates for the AG — MS. PERINO: Not that I’m aware of, no. One of the things that the President did upon returning from his trip yesterday was spoke to the Attorney General, following his hours of testimony. The President was pleased that the hearing had finally been held; that the Attorney General was fully responsive to the Congress, answered hours worth of questions after providing thousands of pages of documents, and again proving that there was no credible allegation of wrongdoing. The Attorney General did apologize … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Dana Peroxide Is Bigger Bitch Than Pony Blow

Via Froomkin, I give you the repellant Dana Peroxide. From Dana Perino’s interview with CNN’s John Roberts this morning: John Roberts: “The hearing yesterday, would you say that ‘brutal’ would be an accurate way to describe it?” Perino: “Well I didn’t have an opportunity to see the whole hearing, I’ve heard different, varying accounts, I would think brutal might refer to Alec Baldwin’s voicemail message that he left to his daughter.” What the hell does Alec Baldwin’s privat voicemail message, leaked by his ex-wife’s attorney, have to do with our lying Attorney General? Continue reading Dana Peroxide Is Bigger Bitch Than Pony Blow

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

ShorterPeroxide: No. Q Dana, does Attorney General Gonzales’s testimony on Capitol Hill have any bearing whatsoever on his job status? MS. PERINO: As I’ve said many times, the President has full confidence in the Attorney General. [snip] Q So is it fair to say that no matter what the testimony, no matter what the back-and-forth, that the President plans to stick with Attorney General Gonzales? MS. PERINO: I think — yes. I think the President has full confidence in the Attorney General and whenever that changes for any public servant, we’ll let you know, and I see no indication of … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

And Now, The Gaggle In Which Dana Peroxide Made Glenn Reynolds Cry

Q What does the President think of the gun control rule which prohibited guns on the campus of Virginia Tech?

MS. PERINO: I haven’t spoken to him about that specifically. I do know as governor he supported weapons-free school zones.

Q He supported?

MS. PERINO: When he was governor of Texas, yes.

Unka Karl Told Dana To Hammer His Idea That The Democrats Are Divided

Q What’s the President’s strategy for his meeting with congressional leaders today? Is he open to any talk of compromise, or is he just going to hear what they say and insist on a clean bill?

MS. PERINO: The President looks forward to having the members come down — that’s why he invited them. I think one of the things that he is looking forward to hearing is how the Democrats have decided to compromise amongst themselves first so that he knows what their position is.

[snip]

Q I mean, there are differences. Both the Senate and the House have passed bills, though, and both of them have some form of a withdrawal deadline, timetable. And that’s unacceptable —

MS. PERINO: And here’s the point on that, which is that the President has said he will not accept a bill that has an artificial timetable — time line, deadline for withdrawal, a forced retreat, a legislative failure for our troops.

[snip]

The Democrats have said that they will not vote to cut off funding for the troops. And yet, they can’t come to an agreement amongst themselves as to how to get a clean bill to the President.

[snip]

Q But to pick up on that, once they have negotiated among themselves and have a unified position —

MS. PERINO: Well, let’s see what that is.

Q — then they can negotiate with the President?

MS. PERINO: You’re asking me a hypothetical situation.

Q No, no, no, they will — let’s say that they have a coherent —

MS. PERINO: Well, that’s hypothetical. It’s speculative. I don’t — I would like to see if they would come forward and have a position before we talk about anything that would tie the generals’ hands or have a deadline for withdrawal.

Q But the way you’re stating this leads to —

MS. PERINO: Well, what I’ve said for many days is that I’m not going to negotiate anything from this podium. I’m going to let them have a meeting.

Q I’m just asking you to finish your thought.

MS. PERINO: I finished my thought.

Q With an incomplete thought, an incomplete sentence?

MS. PERINO: No, I thought it was complete.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

I’m back, and Dana Peroxide is as well

She’s the Queen of Non-Denial Denials!

Q Does the President not remember having a phone conversation with Senator Domenici about U.S. attorney Iglesias? Or is he clear that one did not take place?

MS. PERINO: I’ve never asked him that question. I do know that his vague recollection was that he had heard complaints. And then I’ll refer you to his statement — or his answer to a question that he got in Mexico, in which he was asked that question, and he said that he recalls being at a meeting on the Hill in which this issue was brought up — a meeting of senators on the Hill in which it was brought up. But I’ve never heard anything about a phone call.

Q So he’s never actually answered the question.

MS. PERINO: He answered the question. And I don’t know anything about a phone call; I’ve never heard that — except for questions from you all.

Q You mean the phone call —

MS. PERINO: I don’t know that the President ever received a phone call. I don’t have any record of that, or any recollection of it, and I’ve been dealing with this issue for many weeks.

Q When he was at the meeting on the Hill where it was brought up, it was Senator Domenici —

MS. PERINO: I don’t think people remember, necessarily, who it was. And, remember, complaints about voter fraud cases were coming in from various different places.

Q Right. Just to be clear about this, then, Senator Domenici and the President, has there ever been a direct conversation between the two?

MS. PERINO: I don’t know. I don’t believe so, necessarily, about this particular issue, but remember, when — the President sees members of Congress all of the time, and as I think I said last week, whenever a senator has the President’s ear, whether the issue — whether the topic of the meeting is the Iraq war supplemental, if they have a chance to talk about other issues, they will. And so I’m not going to rule it out, but I just can’t say that Senator Domenici and the President ever had a one-on-one conversation about it.

Chimpy Is Getting Tough on Putin

MS. PERINO: In Russia, we are deeply disturbed by the heavy-handed manner in which this weekend’s demonstrations in Moscow and St. Petersburg were broken up by the authorities, and by an emerging pattern of use of excessive force by the authorities in reaction to similar events. We also find it intolerable that journalists were detained — an unacceptable practice that hinders freedom of the press. We underscore that allowing peaceful expressions of protest is an essential element of democracy and a universally recognized human right.

Without Actually, You Know, Doing Anything About It

Q Has he communicated these concerns to President Putin, about the demonstrations?

MS. PERINO: I don’t believe that they’ve spoken, no.

Q Will he do so, or might he do that?

MS. PERINO: Well, I know that the —

Q Or bring in the Russian Ambassador to talk about it, or anything like that?

MS. PERINO: I haven’t heard of any such plans.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

The White House Found A New Word, Isn’t That Cute?

Hey, Dana, when one wants to give the impression of smallness while talking about lost evidence, one does not employ the word “universe” every 5 seconds. Q Is there any concern that the loss of White House emails through outside email providers might involve a violation of law? MS. PERINO: Well, I think one of the things to step back and take a look at is that we are talking about a very small universe of emails. … we don’t have an idea on the universe of the number of emails that were lost. I went through the small slice … Continue reading The White House Found A New Word, Isn’t That Cute?

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Well, obsessives, we’re stuck with back-bencher Gordon Johndroe again as the gaggle arrives in Crawford.

Just So You Know The President Has His Priorities In Order

Q Anything else on the President’s day? You talked about his morning briefings. But anything later today, how he’s going to spend the day?

MR. JOHNDROE: Yes, let’s see, morning briefings, secure video conference with Prime Minister Blair, bike ride —

Q Phone call or video conference?

MR. JOHNDROE: Secure video conference, bike ride, spending time with Mrs. Bush. His parents arrive tomorrow at lunch, and they’ll be spending Easter weekend there at the ranch as they often do.

There’s Sovereignty And Then There’s Sovereignty

Q Gordon, Zebari says that Iraq has been — Iraq’s government has been asking the United States for quite some time to release the Iranians who are held in the raid a couple months ago — said that the Americans are just not complying. If Iraq is a sovereign government and we’re just there at their invitation, why aren’t we releasing those Iranians at their request?

MR. JOHNDROE: We certainly work hand-in-hand with the Iraqis on the security issues in Iraq. Right now it’s our position that those detained were there engaged in actions that led to the deaths of innocent Iraqis, as well as Americans. So that’s an ongoing process. We’ll continue our discussions with the Iraqis on that.

[snip]

Q What are the prospects for releasing those five Iranians being held by U.S. forces?

MR. JOHNDROE: Well, that’s an ongoing process. We’re going to work that with the Iraqis to see what the next steps are, determining what course of justice should be carried out to deal with — to deal with, frankly, what we believe were activities harmful to innocent Iraqis, as well as coalition forces.

Q And they’re believed to be responsible for supplying IEDs in Iraq? Or what charges are they being held under?

MR. JOHNDROE: You know, for any specifics like that I would have to refer you to — multinational forces Iraq.

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Dana Peroxide must be out for a wax job because today we have the wildly untalented Gordon Johndroe running the gaggle. It All Depends On Who Is Doing The Counting Q So, in terms of the number of days since the Congress has had the funding request, there’s some dispute about that from the Hill. They say they didn’t really get a final version until a few weeks ago. Do you know what you’re basing your day count on? MR. JOHNDROE: The day the President released the budget. He released both the FY 2008 budget, as well as the FY … Continue reading Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

One wonders why, if the Assministration was already regulating CO2 asDana claims, they fought this case all the way to the Supremem Court?

Q With the court’s decision today, will the President direct the EPA to decide whether greenhouse gases contribute to the changing climate?

MS. PERINO: I saw that opinion, that ruling. There were several of them that came out today. We haven’t had a chance to review the opinion in full. People at EPA and across the government are going to have to do that. I can’t speak to the broader implications of the bill [sic]. One thing I can say is part of this case that was being argued was with respect to vehicles and regulating CO2 out of the tailpipe. And one of the ways that you do that is by making cars more efficient, so burning less gas, going more miles. And that’s precisely what we have been working to do with our increases in mileage standards for both light trucks, SUVs, and we have asked for that same authority in regards to cars.

[snip]

But in regards to this case — so in that regard, we are regulating the vehicle sector. As far as the broader implications about the case, we’re going to have to let EPA take a good look at it, and they’re going to have to analyze it and think about what it means for any future policy decisions.

Q Well, on a broader face, why did the administration and the EPA refuse to take a position on whether greenhouse gases cause global warming?

MS. PERINO: No, we — that’s actually not what the case was saying. We have long said that greenhouse gases are contributing to a warming planet, and that human-generated carbon dioxide is a large contributor to that aspect of it.

Q Then it wasn’t an EPA policy, which is what this case is about.

MS. PERINO: The question was — it is a legal question of whether or not the federal government has the legal authority to regulate greenhouse gases as a pollutant. And the prior administration said that they thought they had that legal authority, but they did not take action. We questioned whether we did have the legal authority. Now the Supreme Court has settled that matter for us, and we’re going to have to take a look and analyze it and see where we go from there.

Dana Blithely Admits That War Funding Will Not Expire In April

Q Back to war funding. As I’m sure you’re aware, Senator Reid is now saying that he’s signing on to the more stringent legislation, the Feingold legislation. Do you have a comment on that?

MS. PERINO: There’s just these shifting sands when it comes to the Democrats and their decisions. It’s almost shifting so fast it’s like a sandstorm. Last Thursday the Senate Democrats passed a bill that said that — that mandated our troops leaving within 120 days from last Thursday. Over the weekend, when we said this money is going to run out in April, and he said, oh, no, no, no, they’ll be fine until July — well, then, what is it? Are you wanting troops to leave 120 days from last Thursday, or 120 days from July or whenever it is that you get this bill to the President’s desk?

Continue reading “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle”