Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today I found an unwelcome link at the White House Briefing page: 

Press Gaggle by Tony Fratto

Tony Fatso? You have got to be kidding me. They brought in the fourth string for the morning gaggle?

What’s wrong, was Dana Peroxide out torturing her dog again?

Was Snott Stanzelbusy updating his Windows MySpaces page?

Tony Fatso (Nice mug shot, Tony!) gives the bottom of the barrel a bad name.

Make That The Bipartisan Bottomless Bag, Tony

Q Senators Schumer and Feinstein are going to introduce a no confidence resolution for Attorney General Gonzales next week, the Senate is going to vote on this. You have a sixth Republican, Norm Coleman, come out and say the Attorney General should resign. Doesn’t this all add up to the weight that’s dragging him down? And how can he be effective with all —

MR. FRATTO: I think it adds up to the bottomless bag of tricks that Democrats in the Senate would like to pull out on a weekly basis, regarding the Attorney General.

[snip]

Q You addressed the Democratic part of that question. You didn’t say anything about the six Republicans. And you also had Specter saying that he predicts that he’ll resign — Gonzales will resign, saying that he’s unable to perform his duties. What about the Republicans?

MR. FRATTO: We understand that there are senators who have different views.

Q I’m talking about the Republicans.

MR. FRATTO: Talking about senators of both parties, and we understand that they have concerns and questions. We think that the Attorney General has been honest and forthright in addressing those questions; and as I said earlier, most importantly, has the full confidence of the President.

Congress Does Not Matter

Q Quickly, back on Gonzales. Would the White House consider a vote of no confidence to have any procedural impact at all, or would you consider it an empty political stunt?

MR. FRATTO: I think we would consider it to be just another political stunt.

Q Is it not important for the Attorney General to have the confidence of Congress?

MR. FRATTO: It’s important for any public official to have as much confidence as he can garner. And that’s going to ebb and flow, but it will not ebb and flow with this President and this Attorney General.

Gaze in Wide Wonder As Fatso Tries To Stonewall…

Q Yesterday, Kelly asked the President straight up about the report of when Gonzales was counsel and sending Andy Card down to the hospital. The President refused to answer, saying it was a national security issue. No part of her question had anything to do with national security issues.

MR. FRATTO: No, there are two points there. One is the discussion of classified programs; and the second is deliberative discussions among and between advisors to the President — and neither of which is an open window for us to look into and talk about.

Now, I think the President — I think that’s the point that the President was making. It puts us in a difficult communications position, because we understand there are questions out there and it’s difficult for us from the podium. But that’s not something that we can get into, and we’re not going to get into.

Q He can unilaterally declassify, so —

MR. FRATTO: He could, but I think he’d prefer to put the safety and security of Americans ahead of that interest.

…And Winds Up Confirming The Hospital Visit

Q How does it jeopardize the safety and security of Americans, to say whether —

MR. FRATTO: Any time we talk about —

Q — to say whether he ordered those guys to go to the hotel room?

MR. FRATTO: The hospital room —

Q I’m sorry, hospital room.

MR. FRATTO: — according to the reports.

There Are Briefings, And Then There Are Briefings

MR. FRATTO: Let me make another point that the President made yesterday. All of our programs have been appropriately briefed to Congress. They have all had appropriate oversight. So I think that is the forum for discussing our classified programs, and I think that is where we’re going to leave it.

Q Are you saying that the Congress knew the President ordered the wiretapping without any warrant, and they said okay?

MR. FRATTO: I’m saying that appropriate briefings of Congress were made.

Q I’m asking you if they were asked, if the intelligence committees were asked whether he could — go ahead with this program.

MR. FRATTO: That’s not what I said. I said —

Q No, I’m — it’s what I’m saying.

MR. FRATTO: And maybe you can pose that to the intelligence committees. All I can report is that —

Q You’re giving a blanket statement that they’ve been informed —

MR. FRATTO: No, you’re asking me to be the spokesman for the intelligence committees.

Q No, no, no. I’m asking you to be a spokesman for the White House, and tell us whether they knew these programs would go ahead, by the President’s order, against the law?

MR. FRATTO: All I can say is that they were appropriately briefed.

Just Shut Up, Tony; Don’t Say A Word

Q Under what circumstances is it appropriate for White House aides to go to — to bypass the chain of command of the acting Attorney General and go to —

MR. FRATTO: You’re asking me to get into — I know you’re trying to put it in a general way, but I think we all know the context in which you’re asking.

Q It’s kind of confusing to understand —

MR. FRATTO: It shouldn’t be, because —

Q It’s not about — in some ways this is really not about whether the program is classified or not, it’s about the bypass of a chain of command, and why that would be appropriate.

MR. FRATTO: No, there is no — without talking — go ahead.

Q Does the White House deny that this incident occurred, where —

MR. FRATTO: We’re not —

Q — in relation to some unnamed, unspecified program, these two White House aides sought out the Attorney General — who was ill and had passed his powers over to his acting — sought him out instead of going to the Attorney General. Do you guys deny that took place?

MR. FRATTO: Let me say very clearly: I am not addressing any particular report, okay. But I will say that ultimate authority rests with the President of the United States.

Classified Or Not?

Q Does the White House believe that James Comey was out of line in discussing this in a public hearing?

MR. FRATTO: I don’t have any comment on that.

Q If he was, Tony, then you —

Q If you won’t comment on that issue because of the classified nature of the program on which it was focused, it seems like you might think that Comey was out of line in discussing it.

MR. FRATTO: You can draw conclusions.

Q I mean, is there any possibility that Mr. Comey will be charged with divulging classified information for discussing this? I mean, if the President is not willing to discuss this, and it’s improper to do so, then wasn’t it improper for Mr. Comey to discuss this?

MR. FRATTO: I think that would be a question for the Department of Justice.

My Guess Is The Answer To The Next Question Is No

Q Tony, did the President speak with Wolfowitz since yesterday?

MR. FRATTO: I asked that same question; I haven’t heard back yet. I don’t know. If I find out, I’ll try to let you know.

3 thoughts on “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

  1. anonymouse69 says:

    Where do they find this many pathological liars to act as Bush’s Press Secretary? I know that Snow has health issues, but geez, what barrel are they scraping to get these guys (and gal)? None of them can answer any questions, and they’re starting to have trouble keeping all of their lies straight.

  2. cosmosis says:

    I know Dana Peroxide and you Tony Fatso are no Dana Peroxide.

  3. montag says:

    With all the bad gas he was passing, wouldn’t Tony Farto be more appropriate?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: