Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Land Of Confusion edition

Morning, all!

I’m running out of things to call random collections of Freeper drivel, but random seems to be the natural order of things in Freepistan. Let’s suit up and make sure all fittings and hoses are tight , because the first terrible tidbit really smells – I call it –Reeking havoc!

Ron Paul supporters arrested as La GOP Shreveport convention splits in two
examiner.com ^ | June 2, 2012 | James Plummer

Posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:17:51 AM by Casie

Chaos erupted in Shreveport today as police officers arrested state GOP delegates who support Ron Paul for the party’s 2012 presidential nomination.

The dispute arose after the state party’s central committee issued “supplemental rules” earlier this week concerning the delegate selection process. A press release from the Ron Paul campaign this afternoon referred to the 11th hour changes as “illegal rules.”

After fights in the Rules Committee Friday, state party chairman opened the convention moving to pass the new rules, when the majority of delegates moved to elect a new convention chair. When Villere refused to yield the dais, the majority elected a new chair and turned their chairs. As this was happening, the Villere faction convinced the Shreveport Police Department to arrest some of the Paul delegates holding microphones for “trespassing.”

During the forcible arrests, Shreveport police dislocated the hip of the gentlemen in the video here, identified by the Paul campaign as State Central Commiteeman Henry Herford Jr. of Franklin Parish.

(video) http://www.examiner.com/video/shreveport-pd-at-la-gop-convention-arrest-injury

**********************************

Louisiana politics!

Henry Herford Jr. was elected by an overwhelming majority as new convention chair. Mr. Villere, who had appointed himself the convention chairman, refused to yield. When delegates began turning their chairs around, Mr. Herford rose to call the convention to order. Mr. Villere then convinces police to forceably remove Mr. Herford, who is injured and sent to the hospital! Video at source.(My first post. Member since 2004!)

1 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:18:10 AM by Casie
I wonder why the poster had to shore up her bona fides? It’s not like Ron Paul supporters aren’t tolerated in Freeperville…

To: Casie

Good post. Angry white people with bad hips getting dumped by shave head LEOs. Sad what passes for “politics” these days.

2 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:38:24 AM by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
To: Tainan
you have a problem with white people?
See?

typical far left radical ron paul nutters trying to take over the LA GOP and the ” white people” you hate fought back !

12 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:09:16 AM by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
Fight tha power, baby!

To: Casie

these were radical far left paul nutters trying to take over the LA GOP and the GOP fought back.
The paul nutters are not used to that.
they have gotten away with pauhing around the meek old people and seized power !

they want to reek chaos at the gop convention by taking over gop delegates !

13 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:12:51 AM by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

No reeking way!

To: Bogey78O

BS

the radical PAUL crazies trying go seize power and got nailed !

you paul nutters think your going to destroy the gop convention.
think again.

14 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:16:01 AM by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

ncalburt is a one-man Paul-reeking crew.

To: ncalburt

They followed the rules, so the entrenched powers changed the rules and resorted to violence.

Nice friends you have there…

15 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:20:42 AM by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday’s Tomorrow, Today)
To: Casie

One of the MANY reasons I will not only NOT vote for romney if he gets out of the convention with the nomination, I WILL work AGAINST him and the GOP-e and do EVERYTHING i possibly can to make sure that the GOP-e NEVER gets their socialist elected president.

These stupid F’ers in the GOP need a serious ass kicking.

10 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 6:59:58 AM by myself6 (NOT voting for the GOP’s socialist – Romney)
Rebuttal?

To: myself6

> I WILL work AGAINST him and the GOP-e and do EVERYTHING i possibly can to make sure that the GOP-e NEVER gets their socialist elected president.

Working hard to elect Obama are we?
While I admire your anti socialist bent, you sound like a far left liberal nut!

Even for a Freeper, that’s a pretty impressive feat of mental gymnastics.

Sooner or later, they’re going to have to write an addendum to DSM IV just to cover these guys.

Your post reads like it was lifted from the DU – Go Obama!

18 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:38:20 AM by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power – and those without)
To: ncalburt

You can’t seize power you legitimately won.

The Ron Paul camp won their delegates fair and square. The LA GOP needs to ask itself why. Not ignore the results because the current leadership wants a different result.Throwing out legit results is not conservative.

BushTeleprompter
I beg to differ.

29 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:53:41 AM by Bogey78O (Don’t call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don’t entertain their delusion.)
Rebuttal?

To: Bogey78O
listen Paul bot Obama LEFTIST
Paul got CRUSHED here in the primary.

Your NOT getting away with you far left radical DELEGATES games in LA.

la IS NOT GOING TO BE A PARTY TO YOUR FASR LEFT CHAOS YOUR PLANNING

You misspelled “reeking”.

IN TAMPA.
YOU GOT SMACKED DOWN LEFTY.
So go back to try another left wing delegates scams elsewhere.

31 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:01:42 AM by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

Needs moar caps lock.

To: ncalburt

1. Rules Chairman loses election
2. The next day, the State Party Chairman proclaims that old Rules Chairman back in to his position
3. The new Rules Chairman(elected by Paul supporters) objects, State Chairman orders him removed from the floor by police
4. Paul supporters make motion to elect new Party Chairman, succeed in voting in their guy
5. Old State Chairman refuses to leave position
6. Paul supporters turn around seats, begin their own convention
7. Old State Chairman orders police to remove Paul supporters and their elected Chairman

I really don’t see how Paul supporters were “disrupting” the convention, unless showing up and voting in person(where the ballots can’t be fixed) is disruptive.

This isn’t going to work out well for anyone.

30 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:58:49 AM by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday’s Tomorrow, Today)

Rebuttal?

To: Dead Corpse
Obama left wing troll posing as a Paul supporter .

Like a good Radical leftist your COMRADES trying to seize control of the LA GOP delegates behind closed doors.

THE real LA GOP voters hate Ron Paul and gave him NO support.
He came in Last here in the primary because we are a CLOSED primary so leftists like you can not VOTE ! So like a Good Obam lefty you don’t care about the voters you seize power from within ! THanks for verifying who and what you radical Paul bots are all about.

36 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:13:08 AM by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
To: ncalburt
But you have to agree that Villere and friends can’t simply ignore elected chairmen they do not like and then use excessive police force to enforce their will.

It makes Romney supporters look like strong-arm elite Rhino thugs and further fractures the party. It makes Paul’s people look like champions of conservatism fighting the old Republican establishement.

I want to also mention that after the chaos of the convention, one the Ron Paul people (I can’t remember her name) called the Moon Griffon radio show to say they came to the convention in the spirit of reconciliation and the intention of conceding some seats to Romney supporters.

49 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:37:50 AM by Casie
Whaddya say about that, Burt?

To: Casie

You got to be kidding me.

You are a Paulbot.

50 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:45:43 AM by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

One sleaze fits all.
More sleazy reeking fun after the fault line.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Land Of Confusion edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Land Of Confusion edition

Morning, all!

I’m running out of things to call random collections of Freeper drivel, but random seems to be the natural order of things in Freepistan. Let’s suit up and make sure all fittings and hoses are tight , because the first terrible tidbit really smells – I call it –Reeking havoc!

Ron Paul supporters arrested as La GOP Shreveport convention splits in two
examiner.com ^ | June 2, 2012 | James Plummer

Posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:17:51 AM byCasie

Chaos erupted in Shreveport today as police officers arrested state GOP delegates who support Ron Paul for the party’s 2012 presidential nomination.

The dispute arose after the state party’s central committee issued “supplemental rules” earlier this week concerning the delegate selection process. A press release from the Ron Paul campaign this afternoon referred to the 11th hour changes as “illegal rules.”

After fights in the Rules Committee Friday, state party chairman opened the convention moving to pass the new rules, when the majority of delegates moved to elect a new convention chair. When Villere refused to yield the dais, the majority elected a new chair and turned their chairs. As this was happening, the Villere faction convinced the Shreveport Police Department to arrest some of the Paul delegates holding microphones for “trespassing.”

During the forcible arrests, Shreveport police dislocated the hip of the gentlemen in the video here, identified by the Paul campaign as State Central Commiteeman Henry Herford Jr. of Franklin Parish.

(video) http://www.examiner.com/video/shreveport-pd-at-la-gop-convention-arrest-injury

**********************************

Louisiana politics!

Henry Herford Jr. was elected by an overwhelming majority as new convention chair. Mr. Villere, who had appointed himself the convention chairman, refused to yield. When delegates began turning their chairs around, Mr. Herford rose to call the convention to order. Mr. Villere then convinces police to forceably remove Mr. Herford, who is injured and sent to the hospital! Video at source.(My first post. Member since 2004!)

1 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:18:10 AM byCasie
I wonder why the poster had to shore up herbona fides? It’s not like Ron Paul supporters aren’t tolerated in Freeperville…

To: Casie

Good post. Angry white people with bad hips getting dumped by shave head LEOs. Sad what passes for “politics” these days.

2 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:38:24 AM byTainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
To: Tainan
you have a problem with white people?
See?

typical far left radical ron paul nutters trying to take over the LA GOP and the ” white people” you hate fought back !

12 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:09:16 AM byncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
Fight tha power, baby!

To: Casie

these were radical far left paul nutters trying to take over the LA GOP and the GOP fought back.
The paul nutters are not used to that.
they have gotten away with pauhing around the meek old people and seized power !

they want toreek chaos at the gop convention by taking over gop delegates !

13 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:12:51 AM byncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

No reekingway!

To: Bogey78O

BS

the radical PAUL crazies trying go seize power and got nailed !

you paul nutters think your going to destroy the gop convention.
think again.

14 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:16:01 AM byncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

ncalburt is a one-man Paul-reeking crew.

To: ncalburt

They followed the rules, so the entrenched powers changed the rules and resorted to violence.

Nice friends you have there…

15 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:20:42 AM byDead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday’s Tomorrow, Today)
To: Casie

One of the MANY reasons I will not only NOT vote for romney if he gets out of the convention with the nomination, I WILL work AGAINST him and the GOP-e and do EVERYTHING i possibly can to make sure that the GOP-e NEVER gets their socialist elected president.

These stupid F’ers in the GOP need a serious ass kicking.

10 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 6:59:58 AM bymyself6 (NOT voting for the GOP’s socialist – Romney)
Rebuttal?

To: myself6

> I WILL work AGAINST him and the GOP-e and do EVERYTHING i possibly can to make sure that the GOP-e NEVER gets their socialist elected president.

Working hard to elect Obama are we?
While I admire your anti socialist bent, you sound like a far left liberal nut!

Even for a Freeper, that’s a pretty impressive feat of mental gymnastics.

Sooner or later, they’re going to have to write an addendum to DSM IV just to cover these guys.

Your post reads like it was lifted from the DU – Go Obama!

18 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:38:20 AM bybill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power – and those without)
To: ncalburt

You can’t seize power you legitimately won.

The Ron Paul camp won their delegates fair and square. The LA GOP needs to ask itself why. Not ignore the results because the current leadership wants a different result.Throwing out legit results is not conservative.

BushTeleprompter
I beg to differ.

29 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:53:41 AM byBogey78O (Don’t call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don’t entertain their delusion.)
Rebuttal?

To: Bogey78O
listen Paul bot Obama LEFTIST
Paul got CRUSHED here in the primary.

Your NOT getting away with you far left radical DELEGATES games in LA.

la IS NOT GOING TO BE A PARTY TO YOUR FASR LEFT CHAOS YOUR PLANNING

You misspelled “reeking”.

IN TAMPA.
YOU GOT SMACKED DOWN LEFTY.
So go back to try another left wing delegates scams elsewhere.

31 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:01:42 AM byncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

Needs moar caps lock.

To: ncalburt

1. Rules Chairman loses election
2. The next day, the State Party Chairman proclaims that old Rules Chairman back in to his position
3. The new Rules Chairman(elected by Paul supporters) objects, State Chairman orders him removed from the floor by police
4. Paul supporters make motion to elect new Party Chairman, succeed in voting in their guy
5. Old State Chairman refuses to leave position
6. Paul supporters turn around seats, begin their own convention
7. Old State Chairman orders police to remove Paul supporters and their elected Chairman

I really don’t see how Paul supporters were “disrupting” the convention, unless showing up and voting in person(where the ballots can’t be fixed) is disruptive.

This isn’t going to work out well for anyone.

30 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:58:49 AM byDead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday’s Tomorrow, Today)

Rebuttal?

To: Dead Corpse
Obama left wing troll posing as a Paul supporter .

Like a good Radical leftist your COMRADES trying to seize control of the LA GOP delegates behind closed doors.

THE real LA GOP voters hate Ron Paul and gave him NO support.
He came in Last here in the primary because we are a CLOSED primary so leftists like you can not VOTE ! So like a Good Obam lefty you don’t care about the voters you seize power from within ! THanks for verifying who and what you radical Paul bots are all about.

36 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:13:08 AM byncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
To: ncalburt
But you have to agree that Villere and friends can’t simply ignore elected chairmen they do not like and then use excessive police force to enforce their will.

It makes Romney supporters look like strong-arm elite Rhino thugs and further fractures the party. It makes Paul’s people look like champions of conservatism fighting the old Republican establishement.

I want to also mention that after the chaos of the convention, one the Ron Paul people (I can’t remember her name) called the Moon Griffon radio show to saythey came to the convention in the spirit of reconciliation and the intention of conceding some seats to Romney supporters.

49 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:37:50 AM byCasie
Whaddya say about that, Burt?

To: Casie

You got to be kidding me.

You are a Paulbot.

50 posted on Tuesday, June 05, 2012 9:45:43 AM byncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)

One sleaze fits all.
More sleazy reeking fun after the fault line.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Land Of Confusion edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Hello, suckers!” edition

Good morning, everyone!

The Endless Freepathon is over, and with almost a month to go before the next one! (pay up, Kibitzer)

Gullibility is high on the list of Freeperati characteristics, so let’s kick off with –Are we not suckers? We are FREEPO!

Are Hannity, Rush, and the big talkers playing us for $$$? (vanity)

Posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:41:51 PM byteg_76

Do you ever get the feeling that Rush and Hannity don’t really care who wins, just as long as their dollars keep rolling in from us tea party saps.

CaptainObvious2jpg

Besides Mark Levin, what prominent talker has gone out on a limb and endorsed true conservative candidates? Everyday we have to here Hannity interview the John McCains of the world. If he truly believed in the conservative movement, wouldn’t he be out there trumpeting Richard Mourdock and Don Stenberg like Levin is?

As for Rush, he is more interested in commercializing the tea party movement with his “Two if by tea” than promoting it.

Besides Mark Levin, they’re all sellouts just like the Republican leadership…looking out for their own career over the well being of the country.

Eric Cantor with his support of Richard Lugar and Adam Kinzinger in their primaries is consolidating moderate, establishment support behind his ambition to be speaker some day. But Hannity is more interested in a softball interview with him than evicerating him for his actions.

There are very few leaders in our movement.

1 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:42:04 PM byteg_76
That would be because you’re Authoritatrians for the most part (with some fake libertarians thrown in for flavour). The Dems have always been the Party of grassroots, and the Repubs have always been the Party ofSTFU and do/think what we tell you to.
Also, self-analysis doesn’t seem to be high on your list of priorities – just sayin’…

To: teg_76

In a word …YES !

2 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:43:54 PM bysushiman
To: teg_76

We stopped listening to Rush long ago, as he bumped bellies with those who rolled out the red carpet for tens of millions of illegals, during war time, as he babbled about feminist and golf.

It became unbearable.

64 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 12:07:21 AM bydragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: teg_76

Drive BOR off the air first.

4 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:45:49 PM byPaladin2
OReillyFuckIt
.
Of course the sheep jump in, loudly braying that being sheared isn’t really that baaaaaad.

To: teg_76

What’s your beef with Rush? He doesn’t do interviews,

LimbaughInterview

so that part of your argument is out and he came as close to a Primary endorsement he has ever had with Santorum. I don’t feel played at all.

5 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:46:47 PM byLazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)

Take the hook out of your mouth.

To:teg_76
Ya… we just hate it when people make a name for themselves and make money by promoting their ideas.

Greedy Capitalists promoting ideas just because it sells.

someone should stop them

12 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:54:06 PM byGregoTX (Federalist)
To:teg_76

Uh, yes. Notice how quick they fold up and alter their views once their paychecks are in jeopardy.

16 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:56:29 PM byAntoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
BanHimRomney

To: teg_76
One way to look at it is we are using them to get our ideas out. If they get too far from home, theygo the way of BOR and leave the radio.

OReillyFuckit2

Fox has their own rules, as we saw with Glenn Beck. Now he can be as crazy as he wants to be, but while at Fox, he was “handled”.

And now he’s handling himself.

In a marketplace of ideas, the bad ideas go away eventually. CNN. MSNBC, and others are examples of that. There is absolutely nothing to stop you from blogging, becoming a writer, or becoming a talk show host.To keep an audience, you would have to keep some opinions close to your vest.

Death penalty for being brown, ferinstance.

Savage and Stein prove that. Levin is the only one that can call someone a liar, or communist and get back on the air the next day. I think hat’s because he’s a lawyer and leaves a way out. Look at what’s happened to Anne(sic) Coulter. I bet her next book isn’t quite the best seller she is used to.

18 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:57:26 PM bychuckles
To: teg_76

Rush and Levin are the only ones I listen to. Occasionally Beck…tho I’m growing tired of the ‘spectacular revelations’ he has

BeckBlackboard2

(i.e. the Buffett connection to the pipeline deal. FReepers knew about that MONTHS ago!!!)

Hannity drives me nuts and I turn his show OFF as of late. He’s a toadie for the RNC…panders to the establishment with this “can’t we all just get along” attitude.

Particularly pissed about his lecturing to us about Breitbart’s death and that HE knew about Andrew’s heart condition and that we should lay off about the autopsy.

Breittoast

Most annoying with him is his pandering for the ‘black vote’ with the guests and callers he has on. It’s like…”well I know you’re going to vote for Obama…but can I sway you and your kids by sending you a beautiful arrangement of flowers from Pre-Flora and toys for the kids?” It’s disgusting. I’m sorry, No different from what the Democraps promise them. And that’s my damned opinion. So, there.

21 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:02:26 PM byRushIsMyTeddyBear
Freepers then speculate about their herojumping into a lifeboat and leaving them to go down with the ship…

To: teg_76

Yes, but Rush to his credit is pretty open about it. I don’t think he is joking one whit about bolting if the bottom drops out, and why not? Who would not if the option were there? He has also paid his dues and busted the crap out of many a leftist when he is not, in his own words “carrying water” for the Geriatric Old Plantation.

Hannity . . . Don’t like him for a number of reasons so I will withold comment. I don’t think I can be objective about him.

11 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:53:47 PM byPsalm 144 (Obama’s record is an open charnel pit. Romney’s too, but under a whitened sepulchre.)
To: Psalm 144

Would you explain a little bit more about Rush bolting? It’s been a good 2-3 weeks or more since I listened to his show. Is he talking about leaving the U.S.? I’d love to know when he discussed this.

39 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:17:03 PM byChocChipCookie
To: Psalm 144

He said he’d go to Costa Rica of all places. That was back in 2010 before the passage of ObamaCare.

43 posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:28:37 PM byTheoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
So – let me get this straight – Viagra-boy is wanting to move to Costa Rica, which has national health care?
To get away from“Obamacare”??
With YOUR money??
DogbertDemons
More collateral damage after the drone attack…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Hello, suckers!” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag II” edition

Good morning, gentle people – back to light duty, so a relatively short “Obsession” today.

Since it is Memorial Day, let’s lead off with the Freeperatis’ salute to the troops they so profess to love.

Soldiers? RINOS!!!!

Veterans Favor Obama Over Romney – They’re Sick of War
The Auburn Journal ^| May 13, 2012 | “Over_L”

Posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:38:42 AM by Colonel Kangaroo

YAY! The good Captain got a promotion!

(In related news, Mr. Green Jeans is now Corporal Green Jeans)

According to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll, veterans favor Obama over Romney by as much as seven percentage points. They favor cutting the defense budget. Read more…

COLUMBIA, South Carolina (Reuters) – Mack McDowell likes to spend time at the local knife and gun show “drooling over firearms,” as he puts it. Retired after 30 years in the U.S. Army, he has lined his study with books on war, framed battalion patches from his tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, a John Wayne poster, and an 1861 Springfield rifle from an ancestor who fought in the Civil War.

But when it comes to the 2012 presidential election, Master Sergeant McDowell is no hawk.

In South Carolina’s January primary, the one-time Reagan supporter voted for Ron Paul “because of his unchanging stand against overseas involvement.” In November, McDowell plans to vote for the candidate least likely to wage “knee-jerk reaction wars.”

Disaffection with the politics of shock and awe runs deep among men and women who have served in the military during the past decade of conflict. Only 32 percent think the war in Iraq ended successfully, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. And far more of them would pull out of Afghanistan than continue military operations there.

While the 2012 campaign today is dominated by economic and domestic issues, military concerns could easily jump to the fore. Nearly 90,000 U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan. Israeli politicians and their U.S. supporters debate over whether to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities as partisans bicker over proposed Pentagon budget cuts.

Mitt Romney has accused President Obama of “a dangerous course” in wanting to cut $1 trillion from the defense budget – although the administration’s actual proposal is a reduction of $487 billion over the next decade.

“We should not negotiate with the Taliban,” the former Massachusetts governor contends. “We should defeat the Taliban.” He has blamed Obama for “procrastination toward Iran” and advocates arming Syrian rebels.

Romney, along with his primary rivals Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, had also accused Obama of “appeasement” toward U.S. enemies – a charge that drew a sharp Obama rebuttal. “Ask Osama bin Laden and the 22 out of 30 top al-Qaeda leaders who’ve been taken off the field whether I engage in appeasement,” the president shot back. He has reproached GOP candidates: “Now is not the time for bluster.”

If the election were held today, Obama would win the veteran vote by as much as seven points over Romney, higher than his margin in the general population.

FADING COOL FACTOR

The GOP’s heated rhetoric, aimed at the party’s traditional hawks, might be expected to resonate with veterans. Yet in interviews in South Carolina, a military-friendly red state, many former soldiers expressed anger at the toll of a decade of war, questioned the legitimacy of George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion, and worried that the surge in Afghanistan won’t make a difference in the long run.

“We looked real cool going into Iraq waving our guns,” said McDowell, 50, who retired from the 82d Airborne Division in November with a Legion of Merit and two Bronze Stars. “But people lost their lives, and it made no sense.”

Now he worries. “I really don’t like the direction we are going, how we seem to come closer daily towards a war with Iran.”

In Columbia, where McDowell lives in a leafy subdivision, the streets are named for American Revolutionary war heroes, and the Confederate battle flag still flies on the capitol grounds. Pizza parlors offer a 10 percent discount to uniformed soldiers from nearby Fort Jackson, one of eight military bases that pump $13 billion a year into the state’s economy.

In exit polls, a quarter of voters in January’s primary identified themselves as veterans.

Among them were Karen and Kelly Grafton, devout Southern Baptists who live in the small town of Prosperity, outside Columbia, and spend their vacations at Nascar races. They voted for Santorum.

“He just came off a little bit better than the others,” said Karen Grafton, 51, a real estate agent who served 20 years in the Air Force. “He stuck to his story about what he has done and what he will do.”

The Graftons’ votes, however, like many veterans’, can’t be taken as evidence of a hard-line military stance. Registered Republicans, they cast their ballots for Obama in 2008 because he promised to bring the troops home from Iraq.

“I went to war for George Bush,” said Grafton, 48, a retired Army master sergeant who served in special operations units in Somalia and Iraq. “But we can’t keep policing the world.”

Karen Grafton, a retired Air Force recruiter, said she’ll be “glad when we’re out of Afghanistan.” The military budget? “I’m sure it can be cut,” she said. “Everyone has to make concessions.” Still, many former soldiers worry that Pentagon cuts could mean stingier salaries, pensions, and education and housing benefits.

*****************************************************

I can’t believe that there is any great enthusiasm among our military for Obama on his own merits. But there may be evidence that the strain of a decade of war is being felt by an undermanned military.And some may view the amateur Obama’s shaky level of competence to be safer than some of Romney’s connections to some of the more bellicose foreign policy elements from the George W. Bush admistration.
1 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:38:48 AM by Colonel Kangaroo
As usual, there are two types of Freeper reactions to facts that contradict their preconceived notions.
1. Outright denial:

To: Colonel Kangaroo

What an absolute crock

What’s a “crock”?The Stars And Stripes? The poll?The interviewees, who said they’ve had enough of you keyboard kommandos’ prediliction for sending them out to die and get maimed to make the world safe for Sharia?

2 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:42:42 AM by clamper1797 (Hoping to have some change left)

2. And vehementoutright denial:

To: Colonel Kangaroo

This is bull!. There is no way Veterans or Active Duty Military will vote for Obama. Many retired military people like myself are disenvhanted with the war in Afghanistan, but that doesn’t translate into a vote for Obama. Obama and the Democrats would “Gut” the military if they have their way. Veterans and Active Military aare for the most part conservatives and they will never vote for Obama.

5 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:46:38 AM by Old Retired Army Guy

And of course – the good old “I’m a right-wing nutcase who finds other opinions treasonous, and have substituted Free Republic for any semblance of meeting / knowing anyone who is any different” type who live in the bubble, and will die in it :” , also known as No True Scotsman.

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The veterans I know don’t favor Obama at all.

60 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 10:21:15 AM by rangerwife (Proud wife of a Purple Heart Recipient)

Occasionally the light of reality shines through:

To: Colonel Kangaroo

My gut reaction is to call BS on this story but I’m not so sure I will. In 2008 there were polls saying that retired military and active duty wifes in the Tidewater VA area were going for obama in big numbers and I sais BS. But then obama won Virginia, he won Tidewater and he did what no democrat had done since Jimmy Carter…he won VA Beach. And he won VA Beach with the help of military spouses who were sick and tired of the war and the multiple tours of duty.

63 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 10:53:42 AM by pgkdan (ANYBODY BUT OBAMA!)

How could this BE??

To: Da Coyote
I hope you guys are right but I live near Ft Hood and it’s very surprising how many Obama stickers I see on cars here. Not so much on soldiers cars but their family members. When you drive through neighborhoods you see them in the driveway.A huge percent of the Army is African American and many Puerta(sic) Rican.
84 posted on Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:46:20 PM by NativeTxn

Well, there you have it.

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Members of the 1st Transvestite diversionary farce all agree.

77 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 11:39:57 AM by outofsalt (“If History teaches us anything it’s that history rarely teaches us anything”)

Santorum’s blue balls contingent and more after the jump.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag II” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag II” edition

Good morning, gentle people – back to light duty, so a relatively short “Obsession” today.

Since itis Memorial Day, let’s lead off with the Freeperatis’ salute to the troops theyso profess to love.

Soldiers? RINOS!!!!

Veterans Favor Obama Over Romney – They’re Sick of War
The Auburn Journal ^| May 13, 2012 | “Over_L”

Posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:38:42 AM byColonel Kangaroo

YAY! The good Captain got a promotion!

(In related news, Mr. Green Jeans is now Corporal Green Jeans)

According to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll, veterans favor Obama over Romney by as much as seven percentage points. They favor cutting the defense budget. Read more…

COLUMBIA, South Carolina (Reuters) – Mack McDowell likes to spend time at the local knife and gun show “drooling over firearms,” as he puts it. Retired after 30 years in the U.S. Army, he has lined his study with books on war, framed battalion patches from his tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, a John Wayne poster, and an 1861 Springfield rifle from an ancestor who fought in the Civil War.

But when it comes to the 2012 presidential election, Master Sergeant McDowell is no hawk.

In South Carolina’s January primary, the one-time Reagan supporter voted for Ron Paul “because of his unchanging stand against overseas involvement.” In November, McDowell plans to vote for the candidate least likely to wage “knee-jerk reaction wars.”

Disaffection with the politics of shock and awe runs deep among men and women who have served in the military during the past decade of conflict. Only 32 percent think the war in Iraq ended successfully, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. And far more of them would pull out of Afghanistan than continue military operations there.

While the 2012 campaign today is dominated by economic and domestic issues, military concerns could easily jump to the fore. Nearly 90,000 U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan. Israeli politicians and their U.S. supporters debate over whether to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities as partisans bicker over proposed Pentagon budget cuts.

Mitt Romney has accused President Obama of “a dangerous course” in wanting to cut $1 trillion from the defense budget – although the administration’s actual proposal is a reduction of $487 billion over the next decade.

“We should not negotiate with the Taliban,” the former Massachusetts governor contends. “We should defeat the Taliban.” He has blamed Obama for “procrastination toward Iran” and advocates arming Syrian rebels.

Romney, along with his primary rivals Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, had also accused Obama of “appeasement” toward U.S. enemies – a charge that drew a sharp Obama rebuttal. “Ask Osama bin Laden and the 22 out of 30 top al-Qaeda leaders who’ve been taken off the field whether I engage in appeasement,” the president shot back. He has reproached GOP candidates: “Now is not the time for bluster.”

If the election were held today, Obama would win the veteran vote by as much as seven points over Romney, higher than his margin in the general population.

FADING COOL FACTOR

The GOP’s heated rhetoric, aimed at the party’s traditional hawks, might be expected to resonate with veterans. Yet in interviews in South Carolina, a military-friendly red state, many former soldiers expressed anger at the toll of a decade of war, questioned the legitimacy of George W. Bush’s Iraq invasion, and worried that the surge in Afghanistan won’t make a difference in the long run.

“We looked real cool going into Iraq waving our guns,” said McDowell, 50, who retired from the 82d Airborne Division in November with a Legion of Merit and two Bronze Stars. “But people lost their lives, and it made no sense.”

Now he worries. “I really don’t like the direction we are going, how we seem to come closer daily towards a war with Iran.”

In Columbia, where McDowell lives in a leafy subdivision, the streets are named for American Revolutionary war heroes, and the Confederate battle flag still flies on the capitol grounds. Pizza parlors offer a 10 percent discount to uniformed soldiers from nearby Fort Jackson, one of eight military bases that pump $13 billion a year into the state’s economy.

In exit polls, a quarter of voters in January’s primary identified themselves as veterans.

Among them were Karen and Kelly Grafton, devout Southern Baptists who live in the small town of Prosperity, outside Columbia, and spend their vacations at Nascar races. They voted for Santorum.

“He just came off a little bit better than the others,” said Karen Grafton, 51, a real estate agent who served 20 years in the Air Force. “He stuck to his story about what he has done and what he will do.”

The Graftons’ votes, however, like many veterans’, can’t be taken as evidence of a hard-line military stance. Registered Republicans, they cast their ballots for Obama in 2008 because he promised to bring the troops home from Iraq.

“I went to war for George Bush,” said Grafton, 48, a retired Army master sergeant who served in special operations units in Somalia and Iraq. “But we can’t keep policing the world.”

Karen Grafton, a retired Air Force recruiter, said she’ll be “glad when we’re out of Afghanistan.” The military budget? “I’m sure it can be cut,” she said. “Everyone has to make concessions.” Still, many former soldiers worry that Pentagon cuts could mean stingier salaries, pensions, and education and housing benefits.

*****************************************************

I can’t believe that there is any great enthusiasm among our military for Obama on his own merits. But there may be evidence that the strain of a decade of war is being felt by an undermanned military.And some may view the amateur Obama’s shaky level of competence to be safer than some of Romney’s connections to some of the more bellicose foreign policy elements from the George W. Bush admistration.
1 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:38:48 AM byColonel Kangaroo
As usual, there are two types of Freeper reactions to facts that contradict their preconceived notions.
1. Outright denial:

To: Colonel Kangaroo

What an absolute crock

What’s a “crock”?The Stars And Stripes? The poll?The interviewees, who said they’ve had enough of you keyboard kommandos’ prediliction for sending them out to die and get maimed to make the world safe for Sharia?

2 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:42:42 AM byclamper1797 (Hoping to have some change left)

2. Andvehementoutright denial:

To: Colonel Kangaroo

This is bull!. There is no way Veterans or Active Duty Military will vote for Obama. Many retired military people like myself are disenvhanted with the war in Afghanistan, but that doesn’t translate into a vote for Obama. Obama and the Democrats would “Gut” the military if they have their way. Veterans and Active Military aare for the most part conservatives and they will never vote for Obama.

5 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 8:46:38 AM byOld Retired Army Guy

And of course – the good old “I’m a right-wing nutcase who finds other opinions treasonous, and have substituted Free Republic for any semblance of meeting / knowing anyone who is any different” type who live in the bubble, and will die in it :” , also known asNo True Scotsman.

To: Colonel Kangaroo

The veterans I know don’t favor Obama at all.

60 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 10:21:15 AM byrangerwife (Proud wife of a Purple Heart Recipient)

Occasionally the light of reality shines through:

To: Colonel Kangaroo

My gut reaction is to call BS on this story but I’m not so sure I will. In 2008 there were polls saying that retired military and active duty wifes in the Tidewater VA area were going for obama in big numbers and I sais BS. But then obama won Virginia, he won Tidewater and he did what no democrat had done since Jimmy Carter…he won VA Beach. And he won VA Beach with the help of military spouses who were sick and tired of the war and the multiple tours of duty.

63 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 10:53:42 AM bypgkdan (ANYBODY BUT OBAMA!)

How could thisBE??

To: Da Coyote
I hope you guys are right but I live near Ft Hood and it’s very surprising how many Obama stickers I see on cars here. Not so much on soldiers cars but their family members. When you drive through neighborhoods you see them in the driveway.A huge percent of the Army is African American and many Puerta(sic) Rican.
84 posted on Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:46:20 PM byNativeTxn

Well, there you have it.

To: Colonel Kangaroo

Members of the 1st Transvestite diversionary farce all agree.

77 posted on Monday, May 14, 2012 11:39:57 AM byoutofsalt (“If History teaches us anything it’s that history rarely teaches us anything”)

Santorum’s blue balls contingent and more after the jump.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag II” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag” edition

Morning, all!

The reeking drums of Freeper insanity are piling up again, due to recent Obsession posts having been centered on Mitt and Freepathon angst. Time to wheel those puppies out front and crack them open. Suits on, if you will.

Le’s start back in those golden days before Santorm dropped out. That paragon of Freeperiffic virtues and morality.The epitome of all concepts that the unterwingnut hold dear:

Santorum: Zimmerman ‘has a very sick mind,’ motive ‘a malicious one’
The Daily Caller ^ | March 25, 2012 | Jeff Poor

Posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:22:54 PM by Free ThinkerNY

On Sunday’s “Face the Nation” on CBS, Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum explained that his view of the Trayvon Martin shooting differed significantly from the one held by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Gingrich was critical of President Barack Obama’s reaction, but Santorum placed the blame on accused shooter George Zimmerman’s mental state.

“Well, you know, obviously, I’m not privy to what’s going on in someone’s mind,” Santorum said. “Obviously, in my opinion, someone … has a very sick mind who would pursue someone like this. This is clearly a heinous act. You know, there are a lot of people who have a lot of distorted views of reality. It’s a tragic, tragic case. And my heart goes out to the parents, too.

Oh, you have just SO stepped in the shit, Ricky.

I can’t imagine what they’re suffering, losing their son in such a horrific way. All I would say is that, whatever the motive is, it was a malicious one, and a very, very tragic one.”

1 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:22:57 PM by Free ThinkerNY
Well, bang goes HIS application!

To: Free ThinkerNY

Santorum is DONE…

2 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:24:59 PM by goodnesswins (2012…”We mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor”)
To: Free ThinkerNY

I’m beginning to think Santorum may have mental issues.

5 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:25:17 PM by Krankor (eenie meenie, chili beanie, the spirits are about to speak.)
Just now?
Just now you’re beginning to think “man-on-dog” Santorum may have mental issues?

To: goodnesswins

Isn’t this idiot a lawyer?

6 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:26:00 PM by pugmama

“I’m a lawyer, you idiot!”
BobBarber

To: goodnesswins

He’s a herd following idiot. An original thought of leadership has never burdened his mind. Which is why he has never been a leader.

12 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:27:45 PM by SaraJohnson
To: Free ThinkerNY

Goodbye, Ricky IDIOT!

19 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:29:53 PM by carriage_hill (I’ll “vote for an orange juice can”, over Barry 0bummer and another 4yrs of his Regime From Hell!)
To: jakota
The guy is turning out to be a bigger gaff(sic) machine than Joe Biden.
Oh, but it’s worse than that. Biden’s gaff’s (sic) are silly, and often amusing. Santorum’s gaffs (sic) are getting to be actually dangerous.
20 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:30:32 PM by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Free ThinkerNY

Rick, if I was George, I would sue your ignornant, stupid A$$ to kingdom come.

Shut the **** up, jerk.

61 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:44:39 PM by chris37 (Heartless.)
I just realized that Ricky’s just been denied three times. And before sunup, too.

To: Free ThinkerNY

Toast… just another moron that resolves his mind without the benefit of the facts just to pander to africans.

74 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:51:28 PM by Breto (The Establishment party is killing our country)

Africans.
Kibitzer, turn up the blowers – it’s getting thick in here.
Quietest thread of the month and so much more after the Higgs Boson…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag” edition

Morning, all!

The reeking drums of Freeper insanity are piling up again, due to recent Obsession posts having been centered on Mitt and Freepathon angst. Time to wheel those puppies out front and crack them open. Suits on, if you will.

Le’s start back in those golden days before Santorm dropped out. That paragon of Freeperiffic virtues and morality.The epitome of all concepts that theunterwingnut hold dear:

Santorum: Zimmerman ‘has a very sick mind,’ motive ‘a malicious one’
The Daily Caller ^ | March 25, 2012 | Jeff Poor

Posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:22:54 PM byFree ThinkerNY

On Sunday’s “Face the Nation” on CBS, Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum explained that his view of the Trayvon Martin shooting differed significantly from the one held by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Gingrich was critical of President Barack Obama’s reaction, but Santorum placed the blame on accused shooter George Zimmerman’s mental state.

“Well, you know, obviously, I’m not privy to what’s going on in someone’s mind,” Santorum said. “Obviously, in my opinion, someone … has a very sick mind who would pursue someone like this. This is clearly a heinous act. You know, there are a lot of people who have a lot of distorted views of reality. It’s a tragic, tragic case. And my heart goes out to the parents, too.

Oh, you have just SO stepped in the shit, Ricky.

I can’t imagine what they’re suffering, losing their son in such a horrific way. All I would say is that, whatever the motive is, it was a malicious one, and a very, very tragic one.”

1 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:22:57 PM byFree ThinkerNY
Well, bang goesHIS application!

To: Free ThinkerNY

Santorum is DONE…

2 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:24:59 PM bygoodnesswins (2012…”We mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor”)
To: Free ThinkerNY

I’m beginning to think Santorum may have mental issues.

5 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:25:17 PM byKrankor (eenie meenie, chili beanie, the spirits are about to speak.)
Just now?
Just now you’re beginning to think “man-on-dog” Santorum may have mental issues?

To: goodnesswins

Isn’t this idiot a lawyer?

6 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:26:00 PM bypugmama

“I’m alawyer, you idiot!”
BobBarber

To: goodnesswins

He’s a herd following idiot. An original thought of leadership has never burdened his mind. Which is why he has never been a leader.

12 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:27:45 PM bySaraJohnson
To: Free ThinkerNY

Goodbye, Ricky IDIOT!

19 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:29:53 PM bycarriage_hill (I’ll “vote for an orange juice can”, over Barry 0bummer and another 4yrs of his Regime From Hell!)
To: jakota
The guy is turning out to be a bigger gaff(sic) machine than Joe Biden.
Oh, but it’s worse than that. Biden’s gaff’s(sic) are silly, and often amusing. Santorum’s gaffs(sic) are getting to be actually dangerous.
20 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:30:32 PM byLeaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: Free ThinkerNY

Rick, if I was George, I would sue your ignornant, stupid A$$ to kingdom come.

Shut the **** up, jerk.

61 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:44:39 PM bychris37 (Heartless.)
I just realized that Ricky’s just been denied three times. And before sunup, too.

To: Free ThinkerNY

Toast… just another moron that resolves his mind without the benefit of the facts just to pander to africans.

74 posted on Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:51:28 PM byBreto (The Establishment party is killing our country)

Africans.
Kibitzer, turn up the blowers – it’s getting thick in here.
Quietest thread of the month and so much more after the Higgs Boson…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Gruesome grab-bag” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Mitt hits the fan” edition

Good morning, gentle people – Firefox crashed and took an hour (it normally takes 3 to 4 hours to do an “Obsession”) of unsaved post with it, so this version is going to be marginally less inspired than the original.

Same starting spot, though –Newt goes(for) broke!

Newt Gingrich Campaign Suspension Announcement May 2, 2012
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/SuspensionA ^ | 5/02/2012 | cspan.org

Posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:08:54 PM bysheikdetailfeather

Sheik?

Sheik???

OMG! The Ay-rabs have invaded Free Republic! Get Ray Stevens on the phone, STAT!

Newt Gingrich announced the suspension of his campaign for the 2012 Republican presidential nominee.

*****************************************************

He did not endorse Romney. Shep said we all must be bored with what he said and Ed Rollins said he self imploded and is a sore loser. Fox is livid. Newt got a lot in about what should be done
Fortunately, people turned him off after about 5 minutes.

in every realm and how the presidency is a small part of where we can focus to make a difference.He went into a lot of detail.
1 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:09:11 PM bysheikdetailfeather

No shit.
NewtSuspends

To: sheikdetailfeather
Newt’s campaign isdeep in debtin deep shit.

FIFY.

I believe he is suspending, not ending, his campaign for the same reason that Rick Santorum did: A suspended campaign can still raise money. They can still leverage their delegates at the convention to get favorable language to conservatives in the platform and/or ensure a conservative, not a RINO, is put in the Veep slot.

4 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:16:29 PM byVigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: BuffaloJack

Its over Romney is the GOP nominee, accept it.

7 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:19:41 PM byjbwbubba
To: jbwbubba

Romney IS NOT THE NOMINEE.

…but he plays one on TV.

Romney just lost his “delegates” in Massachusetts.

THEY REFUSE TO BOW TO HIM, like you.

9 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:21:53 PM byDiogenesis (“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. ” Pres. Ronald Reagan)

Here we go again.

To: sheikdetailfeather

The only difference between the bastard and Willard is that one is half white and the other is white…or, one is half Kenyan and the other is half Mexican.

16 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:38:11 PM byGatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Of course, this is all Fox News’s Fault…

To: Cincinatus’ Wife

Yep. I hear you. Since this election, I have heard so many things on Fox against Newt. Shameful. Beck today said he does not know why Newt is announcing he will announce a suspension. “We all get it and his donors got it long ago. Nobody notices,” he said. “We all know you are not going to be president.” I wonder what it is in Beck that wants to kick someone when they are on the ground and keep kicking them when he keeps talking up love so much?

21 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:01:09 PM bysheikdetailfeather (“We Need To Teach The Establishment a Lesson” – Newt Gingrich)
To: sheikdetailfeather; Gator113; onyx

I posted this on another thread about this:

I saw/heard the speech and it was grand. I could not believe what Shep and Rollins said about Newt afterward. It was horrible and disgusting, protraying Newt as a crazy man who never should have run. Shep said he doubted anyone kept listening to the end of the speech.

I will never listen to Shep’s news programs again.

I’ve stopped watching Fox lately and watching movies instead but I knew Newt was going to speak today so had Fox on. I doubt CNN was as horrible as Fox reporting the speech. Newscasters are supposed to report news, not call people crazy.

I am thoroughly disgusted and angry at Fox. That’s it for me and Fox.

Now, I’m watching “Night of the Living Dead”, a zombie movie. It will be nicer than what Shep said.

At least zombies don’t talk.

22 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:12:22 PM byMarcella (Romney: for Abortion, homosexuality, same sex marriage – No to Romney)
Zombie Romney

To: Marcella

Isn’t it interesting that Newt was a regular commentator on Fox and well respected by them until he ran for president and now he is talked bout like a dog?He must be shocked at their viciousness.

23 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:19:52 PM bysheikdetailfeather (“We Need To Teach The Establishment a Lesson” – Newt Gingrich)

ScorpionFrog

To: onyx

He’s not only gonna endorse Romney, he’s going to ‘sell’ his endorsement for the price of Romney helping him retire his campaign debt.

At least Santorum’s price for endorsing Romney is getting Romney to agree to some of Santorum’s pet projects.

The beloved, or should I sayformerly beloved Mr. Herman Cain made a very fervent endorsement of Romney.

Wonder what Sarah will do?

47 posted on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:09:51 PM byaltura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)

Whatever it is, I justknowit’s gonna involve kneepads.

Much more, including Jim Rob’s impassioned Whargarrbl to “all just get along” after the I-didn’t-jump-I-was-pushed.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Mitt hits the fan” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Great White Draft-dodger” edition

Oh, Ted, Ted, Ted – what have you done now, boy?

You were a obnoxious self-aggrandizing jerkoff when I met you in 1975, and age doesn’t seem to have mellowed you much. Homeboy had just realized (in 1975) that playing mediocre guitar wasn’t gonna bring back the Amboy Dukes salad days, and had resorted to running around in a loincloth and grunting into the mike to entertain people.

He was so proud that he was gaining market share that he neglected to notice that people were coming to see him for the same reason people lined up at the sideshow – to gawp at The Geek. He was the sad kind of guy who shits in the punch bowl at a party to get attention, and thinks “Wow – I’m finally really popular – they’re all looking at me!”, when all he was really doing was providing the partygoers with a freak show.

And now this:

Ted Nugent Stumps for Mitt Romney at NRA Convention: “Chop their heads off in November” (VIDEO)
Right Wing Watch ^ | Josh Glasstetter

Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:31:51 AM byBeaten Valve

Washed up rocker and reality TV star Ted Nugent appeared at the NRA’s national convention in St. Louis. Nugent, a longtime NRA board member and regular presence at conventions, rallied the NRA faithful on Saturday to vote for Mitt Romney: “Your goal should be to get a couple thousand, per person who’s here, to vote for Mitt Romney in November.”

Nugent called President Obama a criminal and denounced his “vile, evil America-hating administration” which is “wiping its ass with the Constitution.” Taking it a step further, he said that “If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year.” “If you can’t galvanize and promote and recruit people to vote for Mitt Romney, we’re done,” he continued.

Supreme Court justices also came under assault by Nugent, who claims that the court’s more liberal members have signed a declaration against Americans’ right to self-defense: “We’ve got four Supreme Court justices who don’t believe in the Constitution. Does everyone here know that four of the Supreme Court justices not only determined you don’t have the right to keep and bear arms, four Supreme Court justices signed their name to a declaration that Americans have no fundamental right to self-defense.” Nugent concluded with a call to cut off the heads of Democrats in November: “We need to ride into that battlefield and chop their heads off in November. Any questions?”

1 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:32:03 AM byBeaten Valve
To: Beaten Valve

I am still not getting why Nugent is supporting Romney the gun grabber.

2 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:34:12 AM bysvcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn’t it life in the womb?)
Because he’s an attention whore?

To: svcw

Just like the rest of us “old timers”, senility slowly eats away at our brains. Some faster than others.

I think Ted has gone “soft” in more way than one.

5 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:36:55 AM byDH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)

When Freeperati start making erectile dysfunction jokes at your expense, it’s time to hang it up (or down, as the case may be).

To: Beaten Valve
“If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year.”

Yeah, sure Ted…

10 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:41:33 AM bystormer

Damn. Can’t a brotha get some love here?

To: Beaten Valve

Do we not like the Nuge now?

15 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:43:04 AM bystuartcr (“When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.”)

“Somebodypleeease tell me what to think! The hive mind is breaking down! Who do I like??”

To: stuartcr

Apparently – at least according to some. It’s much easier when you’ve got someone else to tell you how to think.

37 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 9:08:34 AM byrockrr (Everything is different now…)

TheyLiveWhoCanSee

To: stuartcr

After today, ‘we’ won’t like Michele Bachmann either.

(referring to her Mittens endorsement that day)

20 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:48:32 AM byaltura
To: altura
After today, ‘we’ won’t like Michele Bachmann either.

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.Wait till Palin endorses Romney in Tampa. This place is going to go in to full meltdown mode.

26 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:59:31 AM byDrew68
Popcorn

To: stuartcr

Do we not like the Nuge now?

Yeah, shortly not many to still like around here huh? 🙂

28 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 9:01:50 AM bybillva

To: altura
It looks like you people won’t have any heroes left …

Soon. Very soon.

I think the moment we are all waiting for is if and when Sarah Palin endorses the evil, lying leftist.

Dick Cheney was close, but Sarah is the one who will really push the boat out.

55 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 9:28:54 AM byrogue yam
To: rogue yam

You are right. Mark my word, the Tea Party will endorse Romney in the end. Then the Tea Party will join Levin, Cheney, Bachmann, Nugent, Cain, and Palin on the purge list.

72 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 9:50:23 AM bygusty
Yes – but I’ve saving that thread for after the jump.
Isn’t thereanything that can save old turn-em-up Ted from more humiliation by the Freeperati who used to adore him so?

Ted Nugent Implies He’ll Kill Obama: Secret Service Looking Into Explosive Comments
ibtimes.com ^ | April 17, 2012 | Howard Koplowitz:

Posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:18:27 PM byFree ThinkerNY

Calls are mounting for Republicans and specifiaclly, Mitt Romney, to denounce right-winged rocker Ted Nugent’s suggestion that he’d kill President Obama as the Secret Service says they’re looking into the matter.

“If Barack Obama becomes the president in November again, I will be dead or in jail by this time next year,” Nugent told the NRA’s annual convention in St. Louis over the weekend, Right Wing Watch reported. Nugent, an outspoken gun rights advocate, is an NRA board member and surrogate for likely Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

Nugent spoke at the convention to push NRA members to persuade others to vote for Romney.

A Secret Service spokesman said agents are aware of Nugent’s comments “and we’ll conduct an appropriate follow up,” New York magazine reported.

1 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:18:34 PM byFree ThinkerNY

Oh noes! RINO Ted is being persecuted by the whoremongering Service of Secrets!!! Who work for OBUMMER!!!!! AIEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

To: Free ThinkerNY

Ted said no such thing

DeNile

and the Obama administration is simply fabricating Ted’s words so that they will have an excuse to put Ted Nugent and other great American Patriots in Democrat run Prison Detention camps.

9 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:24:26 PM byUncle Slayton
To: Free ThinkerNY

I guess the SS will investigate him between hooker parties.

18 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:25:30 PM byTADSLOS (The Romney crowd is stinking up FR. This place needs an enema.)
YEAH! HOOKERS!! and um – MOAR HOOKERS!!!

To: Free ThinkerNY

Secret Service Looking Into Explosive Comments
They’ll look into it right after the finish looking into the Black Panthers bounty on George Zimmerman’s head…right?
19 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:26:29 PM byPuppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)

Of course they will, dipshit – just as soon as Zimmerman gets elected President.
Moron.

To: Free ThinkerNY
“A Secret Service spokesman said agents are aware of Nugent’s comments “and we’ll conduct an appropriate follow up,”

Yes, they will fly him to Columbia for interrogation. . . .

28 posted on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 1:32:52 PM byVoter#537 (Cold War Veteran. . . . US Army Security Agency 1964-1968)

Wassamatter, bunky? I thought you authoritarian turd-munchers justluved you some “extraordinary rendition”. Change yer mind all of a sudden?
More thrilling wonder tales after the cheese dip!

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Great White Draft-dodger” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Big Jim’s Manifester” edition

Well, boys and girls, looks like Jim Rob has roused himself from his slug-like torpor and rolled to the top of Mount Olympus to rhrow thunderbolts and rage at the trembling denizens of Freeperville.

All you teabaggers –this is what your movement has wrought. The people who actually hold power on the right side of the aisle have kicked you to the curb like the febrile fringe element you are.

Daddy was quite happy to let you sit in the driveway and pretend to steer – but your attempt to suddenly try and grab the wheel while Daddy is driving down the street has been met with a cuff to the side of the head, and a gruff warning about what will happen to your sorry asses if youever try that again.

And Jim Rob is going to pack his things in his pillowcase and run away and you’ll all be sorry then, see if you won’t!

Notice: Free Republic has been in full rebellion mode since 2008 and will remain so for the duration
Click here to pledge your support! ^ | April 11, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:04:00 PM byJim Robinson

Notice: Free Republic has been in full rebellion mode since 2008 and will remain in full rebellion mode for the duration!

No more Doles!! No more McCains!!

JimRobNoMccain

No more RINOS!!

No more pencils, no more books…

NO ROMNEY!!

Sorry – I just looked, and he’s still there. Nice try, though.

Those who cannot stomach rebellion might as well start looking for a new home on the net!!

“I may even banmyself!”

Those who have ignored my hundreds of posts on this crucial issue or who have doubted me these last three or four years might as well get used to it. FR will never support the abortionist, homosexualist, socialist, mandate loving, constitution trampling liar Mitt Romney.

“Also, I’ll be holding my breath untilyou turn blue. So there.”

In case you haven’t noticed, a TEA Party rebellion is on and Free Republic signed on years ago. There is no turning back. No more crap from the GOP-e!!They’ve screwed us for the last time!!

Ah – but weren’t you justasking for it? I mean – justlook at the way you guys were dressed!

Karl Rove and Mitt Romney, et al, loathe conservatism and loathe the tea party and took it upon themselves to use their money and connections to destroy nearly every one of our conservative tea party candidates while pushing their big government RINOS.

Well, if you hadn’t been fellating Karl Rove and his ilk with such gusto eight years ago, your words might have some credence.

But you were, so they don’t.

That makes them the enemy. I will not reward that betrayal by giving them my support or my vote.

OneDoesNot

FR is and will remain a pro-life, pro-limited government conservative site!!

There will, however, be unlimited Freepathons!

We are beholden to NO ONE!! We bow to no kings!! We bow toNO RINOS!!

JimRobCoulter

I’d rather fight and die like a man than bend over and be screwed by a RINO!! I refuse to kiss Karl Rove or Mitt Romney’s rings!! They can kiss my rosy red ass instead!!

“Unless, of course, they give me a photo op.”

FUMR!! FUGOP!!

Wharrgarbl

Long live the rebellion!!

Hope my message is clear.

1 posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:04:11 PM byJim Robinson
As an unmuddied lake, Jimbo. As clear as an azure sky of deepest summer.
As you would expect, the replies fall into two camps – the “WOO HOO! Let’s lose someMORE!” camps and the horrified camp who sees the Once And Future Tea Party throwing the election to The Dark Overlord.

iv>

To: Jim Robinson
COUNT ME IN JIM!

Gonna go over to the donate page anddouble this month’s monthly.

We have an opportunity to make history — let’s not miss it!!

(Be right back…)

4 posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:07:22 PM bydayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)

FoolAndHisMoney2

To: Jim Robinson

but, but, Ann Coulter says he is a conservative…/sarc

7 posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:08:32 PM bySquidpup (“Fight the Good Fight”)

Jimbo – are you gonna let him talk about your transexual girlfriend that way? She who once gave you a handjob in your own kitchen?

To: mamelukesabre

Rove and his pals didn’t lift a finger to support any of our tea party candidates in 2010

That’s because you were tools that have served their purpose and are now expendable.

in fact went way out of their way to torpedo many of them. FOX news, too.

Up yours Karl Rove!! Up yours GOP-e!!

FUMR!!

MikeRoweHey

50 posted on Wednesday, April 11, 2012 10:25:44 PM byJim Robinson (There’s no crying in rebellion!!)

Naysayers and much more after theFUMR!

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Big Jim’s Manifester” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – rancid remainders edition

Good morning, gentle people – time to finish gathering up the simmering schadenfreude-laden drums of Freeper tears post-election, so let’s get started!

First up –STOP FUCKING PANICKING!!!!!!!!!!

.


AllIsWell

DON’T POST ANY DAMNED PANIC POSTS

self
| November 07, 2012
| swampsniper

Posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:22:47 PM by SWAMPSNIPER

We’ve got a long night ahead of us.

I’m personally not in the mood for woe is me whining.

I’m pleased to see that some of these negative posts have been pulled

We are still in the fight!

BUAIDH NO BAS!

1
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:22:48 PM
by SWAMPSNIPER
FusRohDuh

To: SWAMPSNIPER

You mean like this one

7
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:28:29 PM
by al baby
(Hi Mom)

Heh.

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I will panic some about the Senate races:

To Richard Mourdock, Todd Akin and the rest of my fellow conservatives:

Repeat after me:

The next time you are asked about rape stow the religious answers away and give the liberal answer.

ThatShipHasSailed

And what the fuck is “the liberal answer”?? “Rape is bad, mmmkay?”

WE WILL NOT HOLD IT AGAINST YOU.

We know where you really stand!

Unfortunately for the “forcible rape” gang, so do women.

Mourdock had no reason to lose an election in a heavy Romney victory
state. This is an unforced error. If Akin blows it too then will WE
PLEASE NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE NEXT TIME???

Stop trying to thread the needle on rape.

29
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 8:55:44 PM
by LRoggy
(Peter’s Son’s Business)

FreudOnVacation
.

To: cripplecreek
It doesn’t look like we’ll be losing anything in the senate

Brown lost to warren, can the panic start to ensue yet?

34
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:00:34 PM
by JSteff
(((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)))))

To: JSteff
Brown lost to warren, can the panic start to ensue yet?

Looks like both Akin and Mourdock lost their once all but guranteed Senate seats as well.

44
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:13:15 PM
by Drew68
(I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)

To: SWAMPSNIPER

It’s the demographics folks and we can’t reverse the trend. The GOP is finished as a national party.

61
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:42:34 PM
by 38special
(I’ve been banned from commenting on Bill O’Reilly’s Facebook feed…seriously)

To: cripplecreek

Can someone explain why FL is 50-50. Polls gave Romney a 5-point lead!
CBS has got OH leaning to Obama. Hope this isn’t true.
CNN is jubilant about returns in CO. I’m waiting to hear what Rove says.

62
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 9:58:50 PM
by Steelfish
(ui)

Rove-sit-n-spin
And, of course:

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Faux News just called Ohio for Bammy.Do I have your damn permission to panic now?

66
posted on Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:21:34 PM
by The Sons of Liberty
(Win One For The Gipper! Win One for AMERICA! Nov 6, 2012)

Gee- wasn’t that fun?
More Old Gold after the “Are you clicking on ME?

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – rancid remainders edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Be of good chair” edition

Morning, everybody, and happy славный день прав работников, comrades!

Let’s all suit up and get the inevitable over with. One of the drawbacks of having a Monday morning posting slot is when something entertianing happens in the middle of the week. By the time my post hits, the entertaining event has been hammered, masticated, ridiculed, and generally done-to-death by every wag with a blog, talk show, or late-night snark fest (hence last week’s bonus Obsession).

This week, everybody and his/her dog has been Eastwooding up a storm, and even some character called David Atkins over at some blog called Digby has gotten in on the freak show that is Freeperville.

Well, nobody nutpicks like your master nutpicker, so if you’ve not hit Peak Eastwood yet, follow me into the iso chamber for the Clint Eastwood Appreciation Thread!

Clint Eastwood Addresses The 2012 GOP Convention (VIDEO)

RealClearPolitics ^

| August 30, 2012
| RealClearPolitics

Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:27:25 PM by i88schwartz

Actor and director Clint Eastwood addresses the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida.

1
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:27:36 PM
by i88schwartz
At first, of course, the Freeperati were all moist in the panties, superimposing memories about the salad days of Dirty Chairry over the spectacle that had Ryan squirming in his chair like a home-schooler at a sex-ed class, and Romney giggling in hysteria backstage:

To: i88schwartz

Damn that was a great speech. This guy is ALL CLASS as are most conservatives.

2
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:29:40 PM
by New Perspective
(Proud father of a 8 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama’s death panels.)

To: New Perspective

Still, anyone know if he’s given up being pro-abortion?

3
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:34:13 PM
by muawiyah

Party poop.

To: i88schwartz

Yep, classy guy and that stchick (sp?) with an empty chair talking
with Dear Reader was brilliant, funny and made fun of the ijit,
O’Bummer.

Almost fell out of my chair when he leaned over and said: (Paraphrasing) “What? Tell Romney What?” “He can’t do to himself.”

Auto-fellatio?

A must see!

5
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:36:30 PM
by neveralib

To: i88schwartz

Ya gotta ask yourself one question. Are you better off today after four years of Zero, or do you think its time for a change?

Well DO ya punk?

10
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:39:40 PM
by Emperor Palpatine
(I need a good stiff drink. How ’bout you?)

See what I mean? For these bozos, it’s always Dirty Harry, and President Obama has just “gots to know”.

To: Dr. Scarpetta
Ditto! I thought Clint was great. You know those wussbags at MSDNC wouldn’t dare criticize him to his face.

And FWIW, I think Mitt is giving an excellent speech…

40
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:01:50 PM
by TheBigB
(Chris Matthews would scream racism at a bowl of Cheerios.)

…and so on.
Now this is what that there-is-no-Atkins guy glossed over with “A few freepers were nervous”:

To: i88schwartz

Clint was a mistake.

22
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:48:20 PM
by onona
(Thank you fellow Freepers, just because I can.)

To: i88schwartz

I can see tomorrows headlines now:

“Senile, stuttering, racist old white man talks to empty chair.”

And it’s already starting. The Madcow just said his speech were the incoherent ramblings of someone with alzheimers.

Love Eastwood, but having him speak was a mistake. Sure, he got some
laughs, but the media will have a field day with his performance. He
will be ridiculed to no end by the likes of Maher, Letterman, Conan,
and, of course, the media.

25
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:49:56 PM
by chessplayer

To: i88schwartz

Ol’ Rowdy hasn’t aged well.

28
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:51:27 PM
by fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: Lib-Lickers 2
Really ~ have you read up on his positions on the critical Socon issues?

Bringing him in is a slap in face.

Do you people have any intention of winning or is this just to give it all away to your friend Obama?

30
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:52:47 PM
by muawiyah
To: i88schwartz

That was rather embarrassing. Clint *was* a good actor but his
politics have always been a bit squishy and he just seemed to be taking
up valuable speaking time. Was anyone really moved by this rambling
hem-haw of a alzheimer moment?

I’d bet Sarah Palin would have energized the crowd twice as well and got off more zingers.

38
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:00:34 PM
by OrangeHoof
(Our economy won’t heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)
To: Sarah Barracuda
“…the empty chair representing Obama was brilliant.”

I’m pretty sure it was a deliberate tip of the hat to Jimmy Stewart’s Harvey.

63
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:30:58 PM
by Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
Who can forget the wonderful moment when Harvey told Jimmy Stewart to go fuck himself?

To: OrangeHoof
Was anyone really moved by this rambling hem-haw of a alzheimer moment?

No, I’m not star-struck over Eastwood as some on this thread seem to be, and I thought his rambling talk was a snoozer.

70
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:35:18 PM
by Fiji Hill
(Deo Vindice!)

And this is just from the first two pages.
I guess Mr. Spoon-me-no-Atkins didn’t see those posts.
Nyah!
One more before the jump:

To: stylecouncilor

I was impressed.We don’t need a lawyer in the White House

12
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:40:06 PM
by scooby321
(AMS)

Dumbass
.
To: scooby321

You do know that Romney is a Havard Law grad, don’t you?

34
posted on Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:57:11 PM
by stormer
This, of course, provokes (I swear to God) an argument over lawyers not really being lawyers just because they graduated and joined the Bar.
All that and more after the click-through!

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Be of good chair” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Newt Gingrich Death Watch edition

Well, folks – other than the never-ending Freepathon, Jim (I’m all in for Newt Gingrich) Rob has been MIA for weeks now.

Maybe he’s too depressed after this:

Live Thread: GOP Primary election results (WI, MD, DC)
April 3, 2012

Posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:24:56 PM bynewzjunkey

Fox News &CNN are projecting Romney wins MD in their banners.

Santorum wasn’t on the DC ballot.

Wisconsin polls close at 8pm CDT/9pm EDT.

1 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:25:04 PM bynewzjunkey
Kibitzer, be a pal and grab some more popcorn please? Southern Beale – more wine? We’ll just watch this one from outside the iso chamber, I think.

To: FlingWingFlyer

Why do we give them 19 delegates? I mean, I can understand throwing them a bone and giving them 6, but 19 is just plain ridiculous when the GOP candidate can’t break 20% in anawesome year.

“You keep using that word…”

They make Hawaii look competitive.

9 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:46:14 PM byRecoveringPaulisto

“Recovering Paulisto”? If he recovered from being a Ron Paul supporter and is now for Newtie, he may wish he had stood on principle.
Or on a stepladder.

To: newzjunkey

The republican party is half past dead and if we don’t get a blood transfusion ASAP, it’s over. romney will never beat oscumma in a million years. This is sickening.

10 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:47:09 PM byMestaMachine (obama kills)

Flatline

To: newzjunkey
I live in the People’s Republic of Maryland. Hit the polling place after work at about 1830 –the place was like a tomb.

Considering the average age of the GOP electorate, what did you expect? Mardi Gras?

I cast my vote, and I don’t mind telling you that I voted for the Newtster.

And I don’t mind telling yo uthat you threw your vote away. And you dimrods don’t have a lot of them to spare.

When it came to the Senatorial candidates I didn’t even recognize any of the names except two – one a nutcase named John Kimble – I voted against him and for Mr. Douglas. I understand Romney has projected winner in the presidential contest.

As I have said before on this forum, I will not vote for that RINO sonofabitch in the general election!

13 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:49:17 PM byConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 – St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: MestaMachine
We are doomed.
You were doomed the moment you embraced The Southern Strategy as a political tool. It’s just taking longer for you to die off than I had originally thought. But you’re getting there.
Witness the death of the grand old party and the birth of a new moderate to liberal republican party vs a left-wing radical democrat party.
America will never rebound in my lifetime and this is the legacy we are leaving our children and grandchildren. Memories of a once great nation being brought to it’s knees.I don’t know which feeling is stronger…sadness or anger.
18 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:56:31 PM bykatiedidit1 (“This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever.” the Irish)

How about stupid? Does stupid work for you?

To: MestaMachine
The republican party is half past dead and if we don’t get a blood transfusion ASAP, it’s over. romney will never beat oscumma in a million years. This is sickening.

By virtue of these Romney wins (and probable eventual Republican nomination), the GOP is giving Obama his second term on a silver platter. Everyone I talk to sees it the same way. Romney is NOT anyone’s first choice and people are disillusioned with the apparent John McCaining of conservatives for the second time in a row. This is republican party suicide and everyone can see it except the elites who are forcing this candidate down our throats.

You’d rather have Santorum shoved down your throats? Yuck.

May God help America out of this potential disaster.

21 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:01:46 PM byMamaDearest
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
It appears like the electorate is starting to take a stand and make a solid choice to defeat Obama. They almost unanimously said that it is now more important to get behind a candidate soon, and to not delay or hinder the nomination.

Why do I get the feeling that’s what you wanted all along. So what’s your real name, Rove?

25 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:04:46 PM byKenny
Shirley.
To: Kenny

I don’t give a damn what you think. The problem with your side is, you were warned that supporting Santorum would guarantee a Romney win. Well, guess what…? We all lose.

32 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:10:14 PM byPSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it…)
I see that the Newticles and Saint-orums are still busily pointing fingers at each other over Romney’s tawdry inevitibility,
Good. Gives them something to do during the General besides vote.

To: MamaDearest

It’s high time for a third party, but the GOP talking heads in the news media will do their darndest to keep party-line Republicans in line with their usual talking points and scare tactics.

“Let’s change the GOP from within!”

Riiight. It’s not like the establishment holds the reins of power or anything.

And 17% (at best) of the electorate will magically unelect/unseat all of them and march proudly on to victory!

I love this place.

“But a third party will never win!”

Romney will never win, either, but we’re supposed to vote for him.

“But a third party will split the vote!”

Good! It’s time for the Republicans to go the way of the Whigs.

And time for “conservatives” to go the way of the Know-nothings.

What did caving to the establishment get us in ‘08?

Pandering to the screwball right via putting a simpleton up for Veep who had to be advised of the difference between WWI and WWII is now “caving to the establishment”?? Fancy that.

What did it get us in ‘12? Will 2016 be any different?

35 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:11:06 PM byCato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Then it is time for Romney to get out of the race. He can’t win.

38 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:13:14 PM bymuawiyah
JawDrop

To: parksstp
SANTORUM ON LIVE ON FOX RIGHT NOW, GIVING ONE OF THE BEST SPEECHES,

I’m kinda partial to this one:
SantorumConcession

(STILL FIGHTING ON) HITTING ALL THE POINTS THAT ENCOMPASS THE CENTER OF FREE REPUBLIC AND ITS OWN PRINCIPLES. 9:25 p.m. Eastern Time

CapsLock4

He called Obama a “dictator”, and he just now referred to Romney as an “etch a sketch”.

56 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:26:58 PM byAmericanInTokyo (Our Fearless Leader, Jim, Should “Release” Freepers to Support Santorum as Final “Anti-Romney” ASAP)
To: AmericanInTokyo

The greatest Santorum line was hitting Romney. He has got the crowd fired up. His bashing Obama and Romney ismost excellent.

WayneAndGarth

He is also revisiting Republican Party history, its failure to win elections by nominating MODERATES—as controlled by the Leadership vanquishing the conservative grassroots. Great speech! Packed House.

62 posted on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:30:13 PM byAmericanInTokyo (Our Fearless Leader, Jim, Should “Release” Freepers to Support Santorum as Final “Anti-Romney” ASAP)
When you have everyone who voted for you in that state in one room, of course it’s gonna look crowded.
But it’snot a Packed House.
Thisis a Packed House:
ObamaSpeech
.
Just sayin.
Much more, including new additions to the RINO ranks after the fork in the road…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Newt Gingrich Death Watch edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Hey mama, weer all RINOS now” edition

Good morning, everyone – I’ve had to scrounge up extra blowers for the iso chamber – the tops keep exploding off the storage drums from the gaseous crazy fumes building up and you never know when…CRIKEY!

Everyone OK? I think I soiled my iso suit, but there’s no point in worrying about it now, as what’s outside it is considerably worse than what’s possibly inside it.

Let’s start with –Newtie – QUITTER!!

Breaking: Gingrich replaces campaign manager, lays off 1/3 of staff — to focus on the convention
Hotair ^ | 03/27/2012 | AllahPundit

Posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:15:26 PM bySeekAndFind

Clearly it’s his campaign manager and the staffwho are the problem.

Alternate headline: “Gingrich finally approaching thefifth stage of grief.”

It’s largely a strategy of necessity: The former House Speaker is a distant third in delegates, behind Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum. His campaign-finance report for February, released last week, showed more debt ($1.55 million) than cash on hand ($1.54 million).

He doesn’t have a revenue problem, he has a spending problem.

DeSantis said the former Speaker will continue to visit states with primaries, but will have a less intense campaign schedule. DeSantis promised that the campaign will be “more positive and ideas-focused,”

as opposed to “Delegate-focused”.

eschewing attacks on Republican rivals. The aide said the campaign will be more digital, focusing on low-cost communications tools, including informational videos, social media and the web…

DeSantis elaborated on the announcement in an email: “Newt 2012 is transitioning into an organization appropriate for winning a big choice convention. This big choice convention phase will be focused on two goals. 1. Affecting the national dialogue to show that Gingrich is the most capable of defeating Obama, by leading on issues that put the president on defense – like Newt’s $2.50 Gas Plan;

Batshit

and 2. A parallel communications strategy directly to the delegates…

“Furthermore, the fact is the more than a million more people have voted against Mitt Romney than for him. We believe that if Governor Romney is unable to secure 1144 by the last primaries, he will be unable to do so at the convention where the vast majority of the delegates are conservative. That creates and environment at the convention where Gingrich can emerge as the one candidate who can unite social, economic and national security conservatives (a fact which is borne out by polling).”

Like I said in theearlier Gingrich post, that last paragraph is pure fantasy. If you’ve reached the point in a convention floor fight where, for whatever reason, both Romney and Santorum are deemed unacceptable, why wouldn’t you roll the dice on a dark horse outsider? You’re much better off with someone like Christie or Paul Ryan who’s young, appealingappalling,

FIFY.

superb on the seminal issue of fiscal reform, and yet to have their national image defined than you are with High-Negatives Newt. Passing over the guy with the most delegatesand the guy with the second-most delegates means you’re thinking way out of the box on the nomination, which means there’s no reason to limit your choice to the people who are running. Although I guess choosing someone who hasn’t held elective office since the 90s and who can’t seem to win anywhere except his home state and the state next doorwould qualify as “way out of the box.” Way, way out.

I don’t know, guys. I’m starting to think maybe he really believes in this ludicrous convention idea. What other explanation is there?

He’s been taking advice from Sarah Palin?

Exit question: Why on earth would he cite Romney’s vote total as relevant to the delegates’ calculus when Newt himself ismuch closer to Ron Paul’s total than to Romney’s?

1 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:15:37 PM bySeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind

And yet he will stay in the race to ensure Romney the nomination. The Newt legacy. Disgusting.

Santorum 2012

2 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:19:34 PM byRIghtwardHo
Um – youare aware that Freeperville is an official “Newtie For President” website, per Jim Rob, no?

To: RIghtwardHo

If Newt continues on this path, he is going to be a very unpopular man after this is over.

Talk about a spoiler..

19 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:57:22 PM byMountain Mary (“This is OUR country and WE will decide”… Mark Levin)

“After this is over”?
“After this is over”?????

To: Paladin2
Newtie would make the perfect srategerist and press secretary

Press Secretary? Absolutely. Strategerist? Not so much. The fabled “Southern Strategy” wasn’t such a hot idea.

10 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:33:17 PM byLazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Lazlo in PA

As I see It, Newt was thinking that there was more depth on the South. Instead, he found the one issue voters still haven’t learned a thing.

12 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:43:10 PM byToespi
To: Toespi
…he found the one issue voters still haven’t learned a thing.

Yeah. It is always everyone’s fault but Newts. It couldn’t be that he ran a shabby campaign that didn’t stay on message and blew threw(sic) cash like a teenager at the mall.

20 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:58:17 PM byLazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
(Jim Rob is MIA for this entire thread, BTW)

To: RIghtwardHo
And yet he will stay in the race to ensure Romney the nomination. The Newt legacy. Disgusting.

More lies for Santorum.

Now THAT is disgusting.

21 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:03:19 PM bynewzjunkey (Newt says, “A nominee that depresses turnout won’t beat Barack Obama.”)

CircularFiringSquad

To: Lazlo in PA

What’s Saintorums strategy?

“Zimmerman has a sick mind and committed a heinous crime”

We are so screwed.

24 posted on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:30:27 PM bymylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)

Aintcha just?
More, north of the Wall, inclucing –Ted Nugent – RINO !

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “Hey mama, weer all RINOS now” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Odds and Clods edition

OK, peeps. One newish topic and a big grab bag of moldy oldies.

First up –“It’s a blech thing, baby – you wouldn’t understand!”

Allen West Calls Trayvon Martin Shooting an ‘Outrage’ and Endorses Federal Investigation
The Blaze ^ | March 22, 2012 | Mytheos Holt

Posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:03:25 PM byFree ThinkerNY

Ever since his CPAC Keynote Address in 2010, Rep. Allen West (R-FL) has been one of the gold standards of modern American political conservatism. He has also been widely hailed as a political model for conservative African American politicians. And now, following recent revelations surrounding the highly suspicious shooting of Trayvon Martin, Rep. West has joined a growing bipartisan consensus calling for the case to be reopened, possibly even with Federal assistance. West’s statement, put out today by Talking Points Memo, resonates with controlled fury (emphasis added):

itself in Sanford, Florida involving the shooting of 17-year-old Treyvon Martin. First of all, if all that has been reported is accurate, the Sanford Police Chief should be relieved of his duties due to what appears to be a mishandling of this shooting in its early stages. The US Navy SEALS identified Osama Bin Laden within hours, while this young man laid on a morgue slab for three days. The shooter, Mr Zimmerman, should have been held in custody and certainly should not be walking free, still having a concealed weapons carry permit. From my reading, it seems this young man was pursued and there was no probable cause to engage him, certainly not pursue and shoot him…against the direction of the 911 responder. Let’s all be appalled at this instance not because of race, but because a young American man has lost his life, seemingly, for no reason. I have signed a letter supporting a DOJ investigation. I am not heading to Sanford to shout and scream, because we need the responsible entities and agencies to handle this situation from this point without media bias or undue political influences. This is an outrage.

1 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:03:26 PM byFree ThinkerNY
Oh my.

To: Free ThinkerNY

VP…lol

3 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:08:39 PM byTheoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)

That was my reaction as well.

To: Free ThinkerNY

So is West also ignoring the eye witness report that this 6’2″ “kid” was beating the cr@p out of the Hispanic man who shot him? Apparently so.

BTW, as a conservative, the media tells me I hate blacks and Hispanics, so my imputed racism makes me neutral…

Wtf3

4 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:08:48 PM bypiytar (Rebellion is here! Free Republic is on the front line!NEVER SURRENDER!)


To: Free ThinkerNY
“conservative African American politicians.”

African American political conservatives. Priorities.

6 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:11:06 PM byI see my hands (It’s time to.. KICK OUT THE JAMS, MOTHER FREEPERS!)
To: Free ThinkerNY

So much for West!

Just another Racist/Race-baitor pretender in the mold of Colin Powell.

Martin out weighed Zimmerman, and towered over him, and inflicted serious injury.

10 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:15:46 PM byeditor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax – No Way!)
Yes, folks – this is how far down the rabbit-hole they’ve gone.

To: Free ThinkerNY

So this guy should be slammed in jail, in irons if necessary, w/o trial. And the Police Chief fired for refusing to jump to conclusions.

Allen West: Some conservative. We’re supposed to be the side of “Nation of Laws.” But not when the shootee isone of West’s People, I guess. Oh well, this is the year for people to wash out of the conservative movement, and today it’s West’s turn. Bye.

32 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:31:29 PM byCyber Liberty (The only flaw is that America doesn’t recognize Cyber’s omniscience. — sergeantdave)
To: MissouriConservative
From what I’ve heard, Zimmerman was attacked as he was going back to his truck by this “kid”.

And from what I’ve read, the “kid” had done nothing to warrant being followed, first in an SUV and then on foot, by Zimmerman, who ignored police dispatcher instructions that he should not pursue Martin.

What would your reaction be if you were simply walking home from the store and some stranger started stalking you and then chasing you on foot?

Throw my bag of Skittles at him?
The fact that Martin had reason to be concerned should be self-evident – he was killed. There’s certainly room for questions in this case.
70 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:58:58 PM byAnotherUnixGeek
BanHim3

To: piytar

Even a so-called black “conservative” can’t see passed the skin color.

97 posted on Friday, March 23, 2012 12:28:42 AM byBullish

This home schooling thing is definitely beginning to bear bitter fruit.

To: 101stAirborneVet

So far, nobody has presented any evidence the kid is a criminal. Since it’s been about a week, I think it’s safe to say that he wad simply a kid who had been walking home to his father’s house after buying his goods at the local convenience store and nothing more.

189 posted on Friday, March 23, 2012 2:35:32 AM byJonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)

BanHimCannon
.
And, of course:

To: SoldierDad

Mexicans shooting blacks is a normal day here in LA.

21 posted on Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:23:01 PM byedcoil (It is not over until I win.)

*rimshot*
Grab bag of aging Freepitude after the you-know-what.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Odds and Clods edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Staff and Nonsense edition

Good morning, gentle people!

Well, Jim Rob officially came out for Newtie (and supposedly made FOX news!), and that particular cigar has been blowing up in his face – oh say – four times an hour?

We’ll get to that in a minute, but everyone please suit up and enter the iso chamber, for I have wonderful news –I AM BREITBARTICUS!!!

Breitbart will release full video of Obama tonight on Hannity at 9pm.
Andrew Breitbart ^

Posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:17:16 PM byjdokey

Obama tapes will be released tonight on Hannity tonight. Click on link for more info.

1 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:17:27 PM byjdokey
Actually, the only thing Andrew Breitbart is releasing at this point in time is autolysis fumes.
Anyhoo, Freeperville is abuzz :

To: jdokey

Very interesting stuff! Apparently an edited version has been released but Breitbart is about to release the unedited version on Hannity tonight.

Obama is seen defending a radical associate of Jeremiah Wright.

And Jerimiah Wright was, of course, a member of the NAACP, as was Lawrence Fishburne, who co-starred inMystic River with Kevin Bacon.

It all makes sense to me now!

3 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:19:31 PM byWilliams (Honey Badger Don’t Care)
To: jdokey

Whoooa! You think BHO bashes the Joos and the US on it?

35 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:38:32 PM byGrandJediMasterYoda(How ironic that Ann Coulter should write a book called Treason.)
That reminds me – gratuitous Limbaugh-bashing later in today’s Obsession…

To: jdokey

Hey I thought it was 7-10 days from now…lol. That is going to be exciting. Hannity comes on at 9? I am seriously not sure.Now how will I chose between American Idol and Hannity?

Hard to say. One show features hapless losers submitting themselves to nation-wide ridicule, and the other has Ryan Seacrest.

lol. JK. This is big. Obviously I don’t watch Hannity much except at 2 am sometimes, but never during the 8-11 pm timeframe. If someone can be so kind to let me know what time this is on, I would greatly appreciate it.

43 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:46:14 PM bynapscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
To: Scythian
“They’ll still vote for him folks, nothing matters …”

You’re right. He could round up all the GOP reps and execute them on the Capitol steps with coverage by ABCCBSNBCCNN, and they would still vote for him.

10 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:25:38 PM byTruth29
Nonsense – what a waste of good labor! That’s what the concentration camps are being built for, you ninny!

To: jdokey
39 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:41:39 PM byLucky9teen (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.~Thomas Jeffer)

Bwahaha

To: crosshairs

Breitbart’s typical MO is to have more “red meat” being held back. Hope this pic and the tape are just the tip of Brietbart’s BHO iceberg. What a gift to send from beyond!

26 posted on Wednesday, March 07, 2012 1:32:13 PM byJane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)

The cigar explodes after the KAAAAHHHNNNNN!!!!!

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Staff and Nonsense edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – sorry smorgasbord edition

OK, folks -Wayback machine time again.

There’s a huge backlog of stuff too funny not to use, but too old to be current, so let’s scrack open some rotting drums of Freepitude and find out if this stuff gets any better with age. As a reward for reading through to the end – Jim Rob has a come-to-Romney moment.

Furthest back – It’s off the rails!

Once Driver of ‘Cain Train,’ Herman Cain Now on Board for Romney

Yahoo News/ABC OTUS News ^

| 8-27-12
| RUSSELL GOLDMAN

Posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:47:21 AM by kingattax

One-time GOP primary front-runner Herman Cain, who exited the race
amid spiraling allegations of sexual infidelity, hears no call from the
campaign trail after his failure to make it all the way to this week’s
Republican convention in Tampa, Fla., he said today.

“No, I don’t
[miss campaigning,]” Cain, a conservative radio host and former
pizza-chain CEO who momentarily led the pack of GOP candidates before
dropping out in December, told Terry Moran of “Nightline.”

“It’s
always bittersweet when you compete in anything, but I said from the
very beginning, whoever gets the nomination, I am going to support them
fully,” Cain said on the sidelines of the Republican National Convention
in Tampa, Fla.

Cain, who briefly tapped into a party then
frustrated with Mitt Romney, was not invited to speak at the convention,
a snub he says doesn’t offend him. “I’m not going to be participating
with the formal convention program, but it’s not about me,” he told
Moran. “It’s about giving exposure to some young stars who are running
for office.”

Cain’s road to endorsing Romney, set to be nominated
later this week, was a long one. After dropping out, Cain, 66,
initially endorsed “the American people,” before throwing his support
more directly to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. It was not until
May that Cain endorsed Romney.

1
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:47:31 AM
by kingattax
Wonder how this is going to affect former riders of the Cain Train?

To: kingattax

Clinching proof— Cain is a baby-killin’ illegal-coddlin’ Neo-Marxist RINO.

You heard it here first.

2
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:01:44 AM
by ExGeeEye
(Romney Sucks. Mutiny Now!)

To: ExGeeEye

I won’t say that, but I am very bitter over his refusal to stay in the race. I don’t want to hear him any more. He is just talk.

3
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:07:16 AM
by Jemian

To: ExGeeEye

Anyone who supports Mr. RomneyCARE, author of Death Panels,
and gay marriage and the BIGDIG coverup, cannot
possibly be conservative. That includes the GOPe.

4
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:31:30 AM
by Diogenesis
(“No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.”- Mark Twain)

To: Jemian
I am very upset with Herman too.
I don’t buy his excuse for dropping out.
He ain’t got no backbone or he is the one who put the info out so he
could drop out. Kinda like the dog chasing the car. He caught it, now
what?
There is another possibility. It was all true.
5
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:34:35 AM
by DeaconRed
(My vote in Nov will be dictated by my extreme hatred for ZERO and what he is doing to our country.)

Folks, this is just the first 5 responses. No nutpicking required.

To: trebb

Careful there…officieal FR Policy is the defeat of RINO Romney.
THose who speak otherwise may face the perils of the zot, and
Rethuglican candidates past or present who support Romney are to be
banished from our midst as heretics. That goes for that irrelevant
RINO-lovin’ quitter Sarah P and the Chimpster as well.

9
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:21:33 AM
by ExGeeEye
(Romney Sucks. Mutiny Now!)

Ouch.

To: editor-surveyor; commonguymd; trebb
Will those long-term faithful FReepers who were zotted after
whispering that Romney might not be the Antichrist after all be invited
back?
13
posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:44:26 AM
by ExGeeEye
(Wait a minute! Romney doesn’t suck? I’m trying to keep up.)

MagicEightballVeryDoubtful
.

To: DeaconRed

>> “There is another possibility. It was all true.” <<

.
Then of course, there is another much more probable answer: You’re an idiot.

19
posted on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:04:16 PM
by editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I’d hoped they’d be)

Nyah.
More old stuff after the non-forcible rape.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – sorry smorgasbord edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – SCOTUS live thread edition

OK, everyone – you knew this was coming, so suit up.

BioHazardSuits

AirlockDoor
.

Let the games begin!

Affordable Care Act SCOTUS Decision–Live Thread
SCOTUSblog ^ | June 28, 2012 | SCOTUSblog

Posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 6:56:21 AM by John W

To: John W

In before the ouster of communism…

4 posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:00:17 AM by IrishPennant (Are you behind a “Blade of Grass?”)
Вы бы хотели некоторые соли для вашей раны , comrade twatwaffle?

To: John W

I wanna see Obagumby break down in tears today.

5 posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:00:56 AM by nhoward14

ObamaLauging
.

To:John W

Man I hope this dies – I don’t think I can stand hearing the term “ObamaCare” the rest of my life.

6 posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:01:19 AM by mike_9958

Which is what this is all about, of course – let your family and friends fall by the wayside, just as long as you don’t have to hear the O-word for the rest of your life.

To: All

Watch how the stock market reacts too. This will have a major economic impact.

81 posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:47:02 AM by OrangeHoof (Our economy won’t heal until one particular black man is unemployed.)

Yeah –20 whole points down at the end of the day Thursday.
I’ve seen bigger hits to the Dow when Bernake wears his tie crooked.
Maybe a delayed reaction? Hasn’t had time to sink in yet?
Nope – Dow closed at 277.83 up at the end of Friday.
Can’t you morons get anything right?

To: OneVike

My prediction is 8 to 1 to throw the whole thing out… the senile old bag will be the only dissention..

This thing is just soooooo blantantly unconstitutional, even the damn libs should be able to see it

95 posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 8:06:37 AM by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)

Forget I asked.

To: unixfox
This along with the Holder contempt vote today. Could be a bad day for the commie/marxists.

I can’t wait to taste the tears of their sorrow!

109 posted on Thursday, June 28, 2012 8:20:51 AM by freebird5850 (Just don’t have a tagline today. This administration makes me quite sad.)

Paging Scott Tennorman!
Please report to below the jump…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – SCOTUS live thread edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Assassins and Freepers and Sluts – Oh My! Edition

Well, gentle people – I had planned to beg off this week and take a break, as long as there were no Breaking News developments in Freeperville.

Am I stupid, or what?

Let’s jump right in.

Before we get to the paramoid ravings of Freeperdom about gangs of Obama hit squads roaming the coutryside to shoot frozen virus darts into fringe right-wing commentators, we need to address something else first – misogyny.

Right-wing nutworld has always been a stronghold of misogyny, and I wasn’t particularly surprised when a right-wing nutjob(whose previous claim to fame was getting caught with non-prescribed Viagra on his way back from the Dominican republic) got all “sluts-R-us” on an uppity female who dared to speak up for contraception as a part of healthcare. Didn’t surprise me a bit.

This, however, did :

Obama phones woman called ‘slut’ by Limbaugh
Politico ^ | 3/2/12 | JENNIFER EPSTEIN

Posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:39:13 PM byColdOne

The young woman who was called a “slut” by Rush Limbaugh got a call Friday from President Obama who voiced support for her pro-birth control advocacy.

“He encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women,” Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke said on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports.” She got the call from Obama while in a green room waiting to appear on the show.

“What was really personal for me was that he said to tell my parents that they should be proud and that meant a lot because Rush Limbaugh questioned whether or not my family would be proud of me,” Fluke said. “So I just appreciated that very much.”

Soon after she appeared on TV, Fluke also thanked Obama on her Twitter account. “Thank you @BARACKOBAMA for your call and words of support. It means so much to me and millions of women! #WeWillNotBeSilenced,” she wrote.

1 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:39:19 PM byColdOne
Now, as the good ole boys like to say: “The difference between a whore and a slut is that a whore will fuck everyone, and a slut will fuck everyonebut you“, so there’s a lot of this :

To: ColdOne

If she’s still having issues getting contraception, she should try oral sex. It’s proven to make teeth whiter.

7 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:42:56 PM byInsidiousMongo
To: ColdOne

Looking for some, I guress. Georgetown women are apparently easy.

5 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:42:35 PM bytbpiper
To: ColdOne

Just Obama trying to distract us momentarily from the fact it was probably his agents who murdered Andrew Breitbart.

4 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:42:22 PM bymuawiyah
Hey! I said we’d get to younutcases a little later. End of the line!

To: Kartographer

After Michelle found out about the call she told the Zero “You called that slut? I’m going to cut your nuts off!”.

8 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:43:59 PM byImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I’m wondering the same.

Michelle: BARACK! You called that white ho?

18 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:48:35 PM byEnterprise (“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” Voltaire)
And then there’s this :

To: ILS21R
She’ll probably move to San Fran and go for Pelosi’s seat…er chair.

Pull Fluke from her chair and it will make a suction sound.

13 posted on Friday, March 02, 2012 1:46:48 PM bydragonblustar (Allah Ain’t So Akbar!)

Now I thought I was pretty hardened to this kind of thing, but apparently I’m not.
I should be able to laugh this thing off as the normal hatred of women from this crew(Yes, I know they claim to love women, but they really despise them and fear them), but this time I’m all out of ha-has.
I don’t know if it stems from fear of their mothers as children, or just their inability to get laid, or their troglydytic longing for women to shut up and spread their legs while the hunter-gatherers go out and stalk mammoths, or what, but this takes the putrid and decaying cake.
Suction cups.
I can picture them as kids dying to find out what’s down there, and then (after a session of “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours”) horrified at the sight of where-somebody-surely-must-have-hacked-something-off-and-left-a-hole.
Suction cups.
This is what it comes down to.
Breitbart assassins and so much more after the jump. I need to hit the bleach showers, and then I’ll be right there…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Assassins and Freepers and Sluts – Oh My! Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Putrid Potpourri Edition

OK folks – it’s that time again.

Old drums of Freepitude have been piling up to the point that I can’t get to the air filtration controls any more, and that’s just not safe.

OK – blowers are on 10 – let’s get cracking!

First of all, Jim Rob has had two bold red banners up on the index page for some time now :

Newt’s Position on Activist Judges, Rebalancing the Judiciary, Restoring Freedom!

Romney’s positions: Abortion, gay rights, gun control, liberal judges, mandated socialist/fascist healthcare (RomneyCare)!

Strangely, theyboth disappeared this past Monday. I wonder why? Perhaps Jimbo has realized that he’s backed the wrong horse (again), and is preparing to jump on the Santorum Explosion?

But at this point in time(the end of Janurary) it’sballs to the wall for Newtie!

I dreamed of trolling against Newt in my maidenform bra and all I got was this big old zot
Washington Times ^| Jan 20, 2012 | Stephen Dinan
Posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 9:33:09 PM byHoodat

Hmm – the mods appear to have altered the title just a tad.

(This thread no longer exists, BTW)

ORANGEBURG, S.C. — Newt Gingrich on Friday backed at least a portion of the Dream Act, saying that he would grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrant youths who agree to sign up and serve in the U.S. military.
That’s a much tighter standard than the full Dream Act, which President Obama wants. That legislation would allow legal status and an eventual path to citizenship for children and young adults who join the military, but would also apply to those who go to college — a much broader class of people.
“I am opposed to anybody who came here illegally getting citizenship. That’s entirely wrong,” the GOP presidential candidate and former House speaker told a young man who asked about illegal immigrant students. “The only exception I would make is if young people, the ones you are dealing with, are willing to join the American military and serve the United States.”
Speaking a day before South Carolina’s GOP primary, Mr. Gingrich said that would put them on par with any other foreign-born legal resident who joins the U.S. military, and who under the law has a path to citizenship.
Mr. Gingrich’s stance puts him in between Mr. Obama and GOP rival Mitt Romney, who has said he would veto the Dream Act.

************************************

Remember the outrage on these boards when the Dems were pushing for passage of the DREAM Act?
1 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 9:33:23 PM byHoodat
I remember when you still had an account on Free Republic.

To: Hoodat
You’re really on an anti-Newt rampage tonight. Who are you supporting? Mitt or Santorum or Paul

2 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 9:34:47 PM byReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it’s the new black. Mmm mmm mmm…)
To: ReneeLynn
I’m supporting the kid from Winchester, VA.

6 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 9:38:58 PM byHoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
To: Hoodat
Newt lovers will disregard this just like global warming, lobbying freddie mac, the Newt leftist here on this board love him working goverment for 20 years then cashing in making 3-5 million a year, but romney can’t invest his own money open up a business and make a real honest living.Amazing group of leftist and hypocrites we now have here.

3 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 9:36:21 PM byGoMonster (GO)
To: GoMonster
You’re calling Jim a leftist?

5 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 9:38:04 PM byReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it’s the new black. Mmm mmm mmm…)
Oh no you didnt

To: gswilder
So is this what we have come to as conservatives?
Support a serial adulterer
Support a person who supports replacing Obamacare (said there were a good 300 pages of Obamacare)
Endorsed a government mandate in healthcare in 1994 & 1995, and beyond.
In 2003, Newt talked about how the government has to take the lead in regulatory control of healthcare
In 2005, he talks about redistribution of wealth to the poor to support healthcare
His healthcare thinktank has taken in $30 million from insurance companies
In 2011, Newt opposed Paul Ryans medicare reform. Said it was too much radical reform.
Newt claimed FDR was the greatest president of the 20th century
Support a person who made a global warming ad with Pelosi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuBd1atfhQ4
Supported Government subsidies for Ethanol to reduce GHG’s
Said he believed carbon emissions are going up in the atmosphere
Support a person who would have signed the dream act
Support a person who goes after capitalism (Bain)
Only speaker sanctioned with Ethics issues
Forced to resign from the house (400 members, including 100 republicans voted him out)
Made $1.5m from lobbying Freddie and Fannie
Was critical of Bush’s anti-terror policies
Opposed the surge in Iraq
These are just a few things I am aware of. And they are not conspiracies, lies or things taken out of context. Almost all the items above, you can find a video of Newt saying them in his own words.
To me, it seems like Newt is flipping and flopping as much as Romney.

66 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 11:37:28 PM bygswilder

Wow. gswilder tells it like it is. Let’s find out more about him!
This account has been banned or suspended.
.
Or not.

To: GoMonster
bye

75 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 11:51:33 PM byJim Robinson(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: freedomfiter2
Wow, we have a once in a lifetime opportunity to elect a real conservative and it looks like we’re getting another hold your nose election. My sentiments exactly. And with McNewt as the nominee, we may actually lose.

42 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 10:45:47 PM byHoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
Hoodat has been posting since 2004.
This account has been banned or suspended.
.
LET THE PURGES COMMENCE ANEW!!

To: gswilder
And I saw a video of him last night talking about replacing Obamacare with another similar plan.
You’re finally getting Newt.
He is a technocrat. Full of “ideas” but they all involve tinkering with Gov’t.
He doesn’t really have the vision to return power to the power notwithstanding his “soaring” rhetoric.
Newt is unsteady and will disappoint. Guaranteed.

51 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 11:06:55 PM bySiena Dreaming

This account has been banned or suspended.

To: GoMonster
the Newt leftist here on this board love him working goverment for 20 years then cashing in making 3-5 million a year, but romney can’t invest his own money open up a business and make a real honest living.
As someone who has called Romney some pretty vile names I have to wonder why this very important fact can’t even be discussed here. It seems all discussion of Romney is verbotten (sp)–he’s the enemy, and any DISCUSSION of who he is beyond anti-Mormon stuff is out of the question.
I seem to recall a website where everyone heaped praise on Sarah Palin for starting a business and meeting a payroll. I seem to recall a website where Obama was bashed relentlessly for living only in the world of academia and government/’community leadership.’
I seem to recall a website where we wanted Washington insiders out, and people who were actual businessmen were in, and where capitalism was championed–real capitalism, not government payouts, but where failing companies were reorganized and all the realities (some not so comfortable) that entailed.
I keep looking for that website, where having money wasn’t a crime particularly when the rich were giving much of their money to charity (in Romney’s case, this includes many non-Mormon causes). That same site praised Sarah Palin for her devotion to her husband and kids through good times and bad.
Not sure what happened to that site. I keep finding this other one, where a serial philanderer and do-as-I-say, not-as-I-do Big Government guy who took money from the hated Fannie Mae when he wasn’t in government or teaching (not that there’s anything wrong with either, but one needs more varied experience) is being toasted as a conservative icon.

44 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 10:49:56 PM byDarkwolf377 ( It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.–C.S. Lewis)

This account has been banned or suspended.
I told you there wouldn’t be anybody left in the end except Jim Rob and his relatives, didn’t I?
Now, of course, Santorum has bubbled up from behind, and talks all that Gawd Talk.

Suddenly – the two bold red headers at the top of the index page are gone with the Cain Train.
I wonder if Jimbo is going to apologise to all the Santorum backers and reinstate their accounts?
More after the Higgs Boson…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Putrid Potpourri Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Palin Drone Edition

Good morning, all – it’s been a quiet week in Freeperville, and I thought I would have to do another Putrid Potpourri Edition, when suddenly, a gift from the gods whistled out of the sky and fell into my pond with the resounding smack of a dozen King Logs.

Suit up, and we’ll find out what the hubbub is all about!

It’sThe Great White Mope!

Sarah Palin, could she be …
Nolan Chart ^ | February 15, 2012 | Mark Vogel

Posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:39:38 PM by2ndDivisionVet

If Sarah is flirting, I was seduced a long time ago! For everyone who doesn’t want Romney, this is huge!

A huge horselaugh, maybe.

It’s only in the modern era that Presidential nominations have been locked up before most American voters even tuned in.

You need a helmet with a flashing red light and “Hopelessly out of touch” stenciled on it. Most “conservatives” only want to go back to 1956 or so. These yahoos want to go all the way back to 1948 and Thomas Dewey. How did that work out for you guys, by the way?

So this year, for the nation, the Republican Primary is kind of a return to older times, when all Americans counted, not just the few power brokers. The race has been a very rich blue blood from New England ( where he would not carry one state in the general election ) and a group of three, Newt, Rick and Ron scrambling for the 60 plus percent of Republicans who won’t be bought!

If that means 60% of GOPers who won’t be voting, I can live with that.

And now, a new card is thrown into the game,

PalinPlayingCard

Sarah Palin coming off the bench to be the choice at a divided GOP Convention! And with just a hint, she will stir the pot and drive the media nuts! Hurrah for Sarah.

In one of my most recent columns I told you about a conversation I had with a friend who had attended CPAC. He told me that Sarah had been the closing speaker, and the best. And he said, she had indicated she was not out of the game, and he even predictedshe would be the horse to mount for the General election race.

Wow.

That’s the only verb that describes this possiblity. Did the Governor from Alaska out fox the pundits, the consultants, and the power elite in the GOP to dance right around all the murderous press that she would have had to endure?

Because she certainly won’t have to deal with any press should she snag the nomination. Uh huh.

Looks like this lady is not someone to play with.

I have been a Palin supporter from the beginning. For me, she was the choice by lengths. None of the rest of the candidates have her charisma, her grit, her unique character. For America, in this time of crisis and cross roads, there is only one person who can truly change the course of the ship of state! And that’s Sarah.

So is this for real?

OhPleasePleasePlease

We can’t know. She did not hint towards jumping in now. She hinted that she could be the one to pick in a brokered convention.

But this does provide a ray of hope. It provides one more reason NOT to vote for Romney. But it also provides a reason to go to the polls and vote for anybody other than Romney.

These bozos are actually “Operation Chaos”ingthemselves. God can’t love me this much.

It does provide a real reason to be involved. For the grass roots, make your choice from Newt, Rick or Ron but do it and be there on Primary Day. Don’t let Romney buy you, or win because of apathy.

America does not have one flat tire. We have four flat tires, a blown engine, no battery, and a leaky gas tank where fuel is running …and may ignite if it hits something electric or hot.

Ignite, sweet prince!

We need someone with a renewed vision of the old America. Yes, the old America. The one that put a man on the moon. The one that on Decemeber 25, 1991 won the half century Cold War liberating 500 million souls in 13 nations! We need the old America that when I was born was unquestionably the wealthiest, most powerful, most successful nation in the entire world. And we need someone who knows why all that happened.

Huge revenues from a top marginal tax rate of 90%?

Sarah proved in Alaska she could be an executive. She went against corruption in her own party…and beat the oil companies at the same time! In her third year as governor her approval ratings in Alaska were over eighty percent!!!! 80 percent!

You’re kinda glossing over what they were after that (and now), aren’t you?


So… we wait. But now, on the horizon, we see a light. So GOP grass roots, get to the polls, and pick anyone but Mitt!!!

1 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:39:46 PM by2ndDivisionVet
HappyDance

To: 2ndDivisionVet

*Facepalm*

2 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:42:23 PM bythoolou (“I may have invented it, but Bill made it famous.” – David Bradley, inventor of Ctrl-Alt-Del)

Commie.

To: 2ndDivisionVet
First, I seriously doubt she would take nomination. Second, if by some very huge fluke she was nominated over her objection, I more seriously doubt that she could beat Obama.

I love her zeal, and would celebrate her as president – but, we Palin lovers are but a tiny piece of this nations citizenship.

9 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:48:59 PM byRon C.

BanHimPalin

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, not likely.

You just cannot decide at a moment’s notice decide to run for president, especially after publicly denying she would. If she decided tomorrow to do it, she would not find enough support to accomplish this.

She is either better off to stay at Fox news and give the occasional statement of conservatives ideals or run for the House or Senate.

I hear there’s a position open at MSNBC.

That has always been my position about her.

10 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:49:17 PM byJonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Amazing she had no time for CPAC the last four years that they’ve asked her and now she does…she’s trying to play kingmaker.

There was a movie out a few years ago with Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves called the the Devil’s Advocate where Al Pacino who plays the devil says at the end “Vanity my favorite sin of all.” That’s Sarah she can’t live without the spotlight.

15 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:57:54 PM byLeclair10
Well, this is discouraging.
Have the Freeperati finally wised up? Have they, at long last, learned to detect when they’re being played?
Nah.

To: Leclair10

Actually during her 20 year in politics, Governor Palin earned her reputation as being a strong leader, a reformer, someone who can take on the establishment and beat them.

That, or a quitter. It was one of those two things.

Since Palin came on the national scene 3 1/2 years ago, she has helpedconservativesher bank account make historical gains.

FIFY.

Palin is currently playing an important role in the effort to defeat Mitt Romney.

By endorsing Sharron Angle and Christine O’Donnell.

21 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:06:44 PM byansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dang man, this lady’s playing with me. We had a name for girls like that in high school.

Hmmm. Just did a Google Image search on the words “prick tease” and there were 5 pics of Grifterella on the first two pages. Try it yourself.

Problem is, I keep falling for her. She’s still got me hooked and knows it. Why doesn’t she just play nice, quit teasing me (us), and jump in?

27 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:18:04 PM byPapaNew
To: ansel12

Why did she show up at CPAC this year and not the last three despite being asked repeatedly? She thought she was to big for CPAC till the last year she saw her star fading she can’t live without that once you get that taste of power you do anything to keep it.

26 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:17:41 PM byLeclair10
PalinMeMeMe

To: onyx

If there is any reality to this, the convention will be a blood-fest worse than ‘64 ‘76 or ‘80.
.

35 posted on Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:29:44 PM byeditor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax – No Way!)

Hell – why wait for the convention?
It’s not entertaining enough that Jim Rob jumped the gun endorsing Newtie, and that the resulting Newt/Santorum factional wars have torn Freeperville up the middle – now we have this??
Internecine wars continue after the convenient “Contnue reading” link thingy.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Palin Drone Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Primary Colorless Edition

Good morning, gentle people – the double iso chamber is still set up, and may remain so until after the election, or until there’s nobody left on FR except Jim Rob and his immediate family.

This edition of Obsession is going to be a bit of a grab bag, as the RINOs and No True Conservatives pile up like cars in a Florida chain-reaction car wreck. Let’s get started!

Before we get to the evisceration of WND, Ann Coulter, John Bolton, Komen, et. al –

I present – Pissed off!

2 U.S. marines in urinating video ID’d by corps
ap ^ | 1/12/12 | staff

Posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:35:31 PM byNachum

An official says the U.S. Marine Corps has identified at least two of the four marines in an internet video that purports to depict them urinating on Taliban corpses in Afghanistan. A marine official said Thursday that the four were members of the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marines, which returned to its home base in North Carolina last fall after a tour in Afghanistan. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because a criminal investigation is underway. The official said that at least some of the four marines are no longer in that battalion. He provided no other details. (Snip) Panetta

1 posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:35:35 PM byNachum
Of course, you’d expect the brunt of the Freeper vitriol to be directed against the Lying Em Ess Em for spreading such scurrilous lying crap against our angels in MARPAT, wouldn’t you?
Sadly, non !

To: ColdOne

Where’s the snitch that videoed it?
Surely the ones who did it weren’t foolish enough to HAVE it recorded?!

17 posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:04:49 PM byTucker39

“In a closed society where everybody’s guilty, the only crime is getting caught.”

To: Nachum

Can no one keep their mouth shut?

22 posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:42:31 PM bypacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases – friend of victory

.

.To: Tucker39

“Where’s the snitch that videoed it?
Surely the ones who did it weren’t foolish enough to HAVE it recorded?!”

That is where these guys made their mistake. It’s one thing to what they did but they absolutely knew this guy was filming and went through with it. He told them twice that he was filming it.

War is hell and stuff like this happens. But it happens in battle.To do it for fun on camera and to show off, bad move. These guys are going to pay for their stupidity.

32 posted on Friday, January 13, 2012 6:53:10 AM bySnark

For fun.
Forfun.

To: Nachum
An official says the U.S. Marine Corps has identified at least two of the four marines in an internet video that purports to depict them urinating on Taliban corpses in Afghanistan.

So what? My response to the Marine Corp. would be…Nick Berg. Daniel Pearl.

And they’re worried about some pee on a corpse?

3 posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:41:46 PM byBloody Sam Roberts

I’m sorry – which branch of the military did Nick Berg and Daniel Pearl serve in, again?
And exactlyhow close to a terrorist cell’s actions do the actions of our armed forces have tobe, anyway?
Should they practice beheading before cameras, or just pissing on corpses?
If pissing on corpses is the new way, the proper procedure’s gonna have to be included in theITS and MCSS somewhere.

To: tet68

piss on them…all of them!

5 posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:45:42 PM byldish (Looking forward to Independence Day)
To: Nachum
Let me see if I have this straight.
I doubt that you’ve ever had anything straight in your entire wasted life.

During war it is okay to shot and kill an enemy combatant.

But you can never ever piss on their dead bodies?

Geneva Convention II of 1949

Art 18. After each engagement, Parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the shipwrecked, wounded and sick, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead andprevent their being despoiled.

There is something wrong with that mentality.

There is something wrong with you, mentally.

The dead seem to have more rights then the living.

24 posted on Thursday, January 12, 2012 9:49:47 PM byjusta-hairyape
Go fuck yourself.
As if that wasn’t enough, a gruesome grab bag of gooniness awaits below the End Of All Thngs.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Primary Colorless Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Florida Primary Edition

OK, people – iisten up.

I’m going to crack open the Folrida Primary Live thread at Free Republic, but Ive had to institute some special precautions – a BSL-3 containment labinside the existing iso chamber. The nasty stuff in the exploding heads of the Freeperati must be contained at all costs lest it leak into the environment – one single drop of this stuff could turn the entire population of the Dallas Metroplex into rabid suckerfish.

ContainmentLab
.

OK – here we go!

FL Primary — LIVE THREAD
FreeRepublic | Waterloo Tuesday | FReepers

Posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:01:12 PM bytomkat

Have at it y’all !

Hey Florida — let’s show the Nation and all the RINO slugs some TeaPower today !

This one oughta be good for a couple thousand !

1 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:01:13 PM bytomkat
To: tomkat

Exit Poll – Newt has early lead in Florida

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2840570/posts?

4 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:03:04 PM bydeport (…God Bless Texas…)
To: tomkat

Thanks for the thread

Hopefully we will be YEEEEEEE HARing here later tonight

5 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:04:11 PM byTennessee Nana (Romney a Massachusetts moderate which is a liberal by Republican standards)
“Oh yeah “Ooooh, aaaah”, that’s how it always starts. But then there’s running, and screaming.”

To: goseminoles

Newt wins in a shocker!!!
Late deciders were fed up with Romney trying to buy nomination and revolted!!!

Whatever happens in FLA, the Newtonian Revolution will go on. Big Ideas must beat Big Money or we are just a bunch of sheep caving into the establishment. Wake Up America!!! If you want to shock the system – you have to be willing to rock the system. Go Newt!!!

65 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:59:00 PM bylarryleo (We all need to get Newtered!)
To: livius

Newt is out to win and we need to get the vote out so WE can win. You take your chances when you run for office. Let’s win this for Newt, ourselves and the United States of America.

140 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:30:13 PM byitssme
They’re so cute when they’re full of unwarranted optimism, aren’t they? Like little baby piranha.
Let’s jump forward a bit, shall we?

To: Kaosinla

CNN calling it for Mitt

523 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:13:13 PM byKaosinla (The More the Plans Fail. The More the Planners Plan.)

Oh my. Everyone double-check your helmet seals.

To: tomkat

Romney wins, a blowout win, we lose

527 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:14:02 PM byjpsb
To: MissMagnolia
Sometimes things are so rotten to the core, you have to abandon or tear them down and start over. I’m at that point with the GOP-e. Not salvageable if Romney prevails.

My sentiments exactly. Shall I light the match and fire up the bulldozer?The GOP is dead to me!

525 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:13:25 PM byRobertClark (“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”)
Actually, it’s the other way around.
You guys just demonstrated that you are a small and noisy minority, and not a voting base.
This means thatteabaggers are dead to theGOP.
.
You did get some of your nitwits elected last cycle, but they’ve all been acting like – well – nitwits, and have painted the entire GOP as out-of-touch extremists (thanks for that, BTW).
Heven’t you noticed the precipitous drop in the number of times/day the term “Tea Party” is used by GOPers?
Oh don’t get me wrong – they’ll take your money, should you continue to be so foolish as to send it, but you see – your liabilities now outweigh your assets.

To: gswilder
If you don’t vote for the republican nominee, you are voting for Obama. And if you are voting for Obama, you are not a conservative. Any of the 4 republicans are more conservative than Obama. Don’t let your emotions cloud your senses.

That’s not going to work on me anymore. If Romney is the nominee, I write-in.

David-duke-for-president

My vote is MY vote, and it won’t go to someone who is opposite of what I hold dear.

536 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:15:01 PM byShelayne (NO ROMNEY–NOT NOW–NOT EVER!)
To: gswilder

Too bad for you this is an ANTI-ROMNEY website. We will continue to bash Romney just as much as we bash ZERO.

That is a fact. Romney supporters will continue to be banned. Don’t look for any support for Romney EVER on Free Republic. As it should be.

539 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:15:17 PM byshow
Touchy little bastard, isn’t he?

To: The Citizen Soldier

I have been a very good Republican soldier. I’ve voted for Bush, Dole, Bush, Bush, McCain.

I do not have a romney vote in me.

547 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:16:22 PM byRight_in_Virginia

Sure he does. This guy will expel the Romney vote he has in him, on the elevator – and then look innocent when the stench spreads.

To: gswilder

Oh take a hike…

I dont vote for evil pieces of dung like the liberal Willie Mitty…

I love my country…

I serve4d my country in the US military

Those gooks and slopes aren’t gonna kill themselves, you know.

the TWO TIME draft dodger coward Williard Romney doesnt deserve my vote

As opposed to two-time draft dodger Newt Gingrich..

NewtChickenhawk

As an American citizen the most precious thing I own is my right to vote

Its like a rare and expensive diamond…

ans so I treat it as such…

I dont give it away to any old broken down stinking wino hobo that comes begging for it…

580 posted on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:21:47 PM byTennessee Nana(Has Romney stolen the primary in Florida from the man the people really want and need???)

Looks like.
Now, it’s time toassign some blame.
Blamethrowers and more after the extended entry…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Florida Primary Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Freepers For Newtie Edition

Well, gentle people, Jim Rob has come firmly down on the side of Newtie as the Anti-Romney, and as I predicted, the purges have begun.

Iso suits on, everybody, there’s no time to waste! (My, what a nice shiny new one Kibitzer has!)

The following thread waspulled(I’ve started copying them in toto and emailing them to myself rather than just bookmarking them), raising the question:Are we eating our own, now?

Gingrich Was No Coward, Just Corrupt
Commentary Magazine ^| 1-20-12 | Jonathon Toobin

Posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:13:45 PM byafraidfortherepublic

One of the interesting sidebars of last night’s debate was the fiery exchange between Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich over the latter’s “grandiose” ideas and unstable leadership style. During the course of this rhetorical dustup during which Gingrich took Santorum’s bait and took credit for the Reagan presidency, the defeat of the Soviet Union and the 1994 Republican Congressional victory. While the first two claims are the stuff of self-satire, Gingrich is surely entitled to puff his chest at the memory of his role in the GOP’s taking back the House for the first time in 40 years.

Alexander Burns of Politico recals that in 1992 the New York Times reported about Gingrich’s involvement in the banking scandal. Apparently, Gingrich was kiting checks along with the worst Democratic scofflaws. His 22 overdrafts including a $9,463 check to the IRS was a major issue in his re-election campaign that year and nearly cost him his seat which the then House Republican Minority held by a razor-thin margin of 982 votes that fall.

Santorum was wrong to imply that the Georgian didn’t get involved in exposing the House Bank scandal because he lacked the moxie to mix up with the Democratic poobahs. In fact, as Gingrich pointed out, he had already played the lead role in taking down former House Speaker Jim Wright. The real reason for Gingrich’s silence was far worse: conflict of interest.

Gingrich said nothing about the bank while Santorum stuck his neck out because he was as guilty as any of the Democrats who were caught bouncing checks at the bank at the taxpayers’ expense.
That information leaves us wondering why, if Santorum was going to bring up the scandal in the course of an attack on Gingrich, he pulled his punch. Wouldn’t it have been far more devastating to rightly accuse Gingrich of complicity in the scandal instead of wrongly accusing him of cowardice?

1 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:13:49 PM byafraidfortherepublic
To: afraidfortherepublic
Wow. I had forgotten all about that scandal. Gingrich may be our candidate but I’m holding my nose all the way.

3 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:26:29 PM byExtremeUnction
To: ExtremeUnction
global warmist, freddie mac, fidelity, Dede Scozzafava…
under no circumstances will I vote for him.

4 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:31:07 PM byGeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
DangerClose

To: GeronL
Ooh! Aren’t you just so special. Clearly you are an Obama supporter . . . or a Romney supporter.

9 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:37:11 PM bySudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)

There are a lot of “In before the Zot” posts, but “afraidforfreerepublic” still seems to have an account, even though the URL for the thread now directs to this:

iv>

This thread has been pulled.

Pulled on 01/21/2012 1:21:12 AM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:

taking out the trash

Of course, at this point in time, the “trash” is still piling up:

To: GeronL
“under no circumstances will I vote for him.”
Yeh as a registered Demorat I guess not.

14 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:41:54 PM byGeorgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
I am as conservative as anyone on this forum. I do not belong to any political party and never will.

16 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:44:23 PM byGeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
Purity test! Purity test!

To: GeronL
I guess you think everyone on FR who supports Gingrich is an idiot.

Gingrich IS a “conservative, sport.”

21 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:49:05 PM bySudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)

There’s a spurious comma in your last sentence.
“Sport” is what they called people in Fitzgerald novels who couldn’t keep their pants zipped.

To: GeronL
I’m still gettin that demorat feelin.

Too bad you weren’t gettin that “learning how to spell” feelin.

25 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:54:02 PM byGeorgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Are you a Noob or something? I have been on FR for a very very long time. People know where I stand.

26 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 5:56:51 PM byGeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
ClownSlapFight

To: GeronL; Sudetenland
I guess you think everyone on FR who supports Gingrich is an idiot. I would be very, very careful in answering that question.
JimRob doesn’t share your disdain for Newt
And neither do I.

31 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 6:01:54 PM byYankee (ANNOY THE RNC AND THE MEDIA: NOMINATE NEWT GINGRICH!)
To: ventanax5
Last time I checked, King David was also an adulterer.

35 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 6:09:03 PM byconservativebuckeye
ChristOnACracker
Family.
Values.

To: narses; GeronL
Why are you posting that to GeronL? There is nothing in his posting past here to try and paint him as a “MittBot”.Are we eating our own now?

46 posted on Friday, January 20, 2012 6:22:12 PM byAzzurri

Why, yes – you are. And you’re yum yum yummy,
More catching up after the thingy.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Freepers For Newtie Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – New Hampster Primary Edition

Good morning, boys and girls!

As Mitt cruises along taking a victory lap, the Freeperati are losing what little shit they had left. Let’s jump right in:

First up –Destruction Of Tea Party – Complete!

The GOP: The party of bailouts & cronyism. Destruction of Tea Party complete.

Posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:34:33 AM byMinus_The_Bear

The GOP has chosen. The destruction of the TEA Party is almost complete.

“Almost”?

The Weekly Standard, National Review, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, & all the establishment Republicans have driven the TEA Party out of the picture.

Now we are told that taking Federal bailouts = capitalism & that anybody who disagrees should just shut up. Why did they TEA Party start in the first place?

Because someblubbering hysterical wealthy stock trader whined about attempts by President Obama to keep millions more homes from going into flreclosure?

Without ethics capitalism is doomed to corruption.

I expect every Romney voter would support Solyndra or GE… because “it’s just capitalism”

1 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:34:37 AM byMinus_The_Bear
Commie.

To: Minus_The_Bear

I think you have it backward.The Republican Party’s destruction will be complete. They are about to join the Whigs on the ash heap of history.

6 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:46:02 AM byKamperKen

And you helped.

To: Minus_The_Bear

You are 100% right!
We are screwed. The Tea Party did not take over the Republican Party…they destroyed us. Now we will have every RINO candidate shoved down our throats. The Dems and the Rebubs are one and the same. They took away every real Conservative from us. Sarah Palin, Herman Cain, Michelle Bachman, and now they will destroy Newt and Santorum! I do not know if America will ever be free again, or have truw free elections. We have no real choices, because they are made for us. ALL of the media are now paid operatives for the elites. All hope is gone…

11 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:50:01 AM byastratt7 (obama,muslim,politics)
To: upsdriver

The closest thing to a TEA Party candidate in this race is Ron Paul and he’s labeled as a kook.

13 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:51:14 AM byBigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
Kinda makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

To: Minus_The_Bear

I thought the objective is beating Klownie the Kenyan? Quit your whining.

I read the same post back on the night when Dumbo won the election and the best posts was when Freepers who owned business wanted to fire every Obama voter in their company.That’s the Freeper I want to read about

Youdo??

KANSAS CITY, Kan. – A salesman says he was fired for voting for Barack Obama, after his boss sent an email to all employees warning that he would fire them if they dared to do that.
He claims Matthew Brandt, the owner of KK Office Solutions, sent the email threat to “All Employees” on Oct. 29, 2008 warning them “to rethink your vote on November 4th.”
Elliot Snell sued KK Office Solutions in Wyandotte County Court. The email warned that if Obama were elected, all salespeople will have to pool their sales commissions to give underachieving salespeople a “fair shake;” that hourly employees will pool their wages, including overtime, to help those who are “too busy to for overtime;” that top management was to be referred to as “the government,” and would be exempt from pooling because the law doesn’t apply to it; and that the last few people hired “should clean out their desks.”
The email, included in the complaint, continued: “Don’t feel bad though, because President Obama will give you free healthcare, free handouts, free oil for heating your home, free food stamps, and he’ll let you stay in hour home for as long as you want even if you can’t pay your mortgage. If you appeal directly to our democratic congress [sic], you might even get a free flat screen TV and a coupon for free haircuts …” It concludes: “If for any reason you are not happy with the new policies, you many want to rethink your vote on November 4th,” followed by Brandt’s signature and title.
Snell says he openly supported Obama, and was fired on Nov. 20, 2008, despite acquiring more than $300,000 in accounts during his 6 months with KK Office Solutions.
He seeks reinstatement, lost pay and damages of $1.2 million. He is represented by Lawrence Williamson.

…not this sob story.

14 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:51:14 AM bymax americana (Obama is a POS)
To: Minus_The_Bear

The Tea Party has been co-opted by the GOP. The economy is no longer an issue for those who have co-opted the Tea Party.They talk of everything else other than the economy – national security, abortion, religionand winnability. These issues induce fear into the sheep and they are willing to forget the economy and fall in line behind the GOP establishment. The candidates in the primaries are establishment candidates who are seasoned politicians.

16 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:53:52 AM byJimWayne
CaptainObvious

To: max americana

Sadly firing folks in this economy is not populist.

22 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:59:32 AM bymylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)

Captain Obvious to the white courtesy phone, please…

To: Minus_The_Bear

I always listen to Rush. Today I wanted to crawl through the line and strangle him. He doesn’t get the fact we know that there are times where capitalism exceeds it’s limit and becomes socialism for the few.

34 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:07:46 AM byTwoSwords

There’s enough cognitative dissonance here to actually make his scalp move a little.

To: TwoSwords

“I always listen to Rush. Today I wanted to crawl through the line and strangle him. He doesn’t get the fact we know that there are times where capitalism exceeds it’s limit and becomes socialism for the few.”

He really was an imbecile on stilts today, and perhaps a whore –don’t know his real motivation so not sure on the latter.

Money

Today Rush, Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan came out against Gingrich. Early for the Ides of March, but there it is.

78 posted on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:48:15 AM byPsalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don’t read their lips – watch their hands.)

Rush Limbaugh – RINO whore!!!
More after the “Continue reading” hyperspace link.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – New Hampster Primary Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Iowa Caucasians Caucus Edition

What a fun week it’s been, gentle people – drums of Freeper toxic waste (triple redundancy score!) have been piling up faster than I can catalogue them, much less open and decontaminate them.

Needless to say, the whole of Freeperville is awash in Santorum, so this one’s going to be more icky than normal.

Suits ON! Blowers ON! Airlock door OPEN! Let’s GO!

First one up –Romney takes Iowa – Jim Rob takes nitroglycerin!

Iowa GOP: Romney wins caucuses [Romney 30,015, Santorum 30,007]
CNN ^ | 1/4/12

Posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:20 AM bySlings and Arrows

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney beat former Sen. Rick Santorum by a margin of just 8 votes in the Iowa GOP caucuses, the chairman of the Iowa Republican Party announced early Wednesday.

********************************

Gee, what a surprise.
1 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:25 AM bySlings and Arrows
Not really, no. If you expected anything else, you’re a nutcase, or Michelle Bachmann (but I repeat myself).

To: Slings and Arrows

Tokyo Rove had a box of Romney ballots ready just in case.

New MSM headline: “Landslide Mitt gets mandate from Iowa!”

3 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:12:13 AM byPAConservative1

“Tokyo Rove”?
Funny. I remember not so long ago, when you buttmunches were kissng his ass like it was the first time you’d ever gotten to first base.
Allow me to remind you, by posting a pic I took fromthe very forum you’re currently posting in, during the second term of the Dubya Administration, when you imbeciles thought “Tokyo Rove” was all that and a bag of chips :
RoveBastard
.
Ring any bells?

To: Slings and Arrows

I find it very odd thatTokyo Rove was the FIRST person to know Willard “won” Iowa.

I guess not.

I would think the people counting the votes and the media would know first. And there were also reports of random precincts not counting right, but they refuse to do a recount.

No question about it: Romney and the establishment STOLE the Iowa caucuses!

29 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:29:35 AM byPAConservative1

To: Slings and Arrows

This whole Iowa Caucus stinks to high heaven! The Fox people said that the votes were lost so Romney and Rick agreed to pre-agranged vote totals?? This whole thing is Fishy…The 2012 race is looking like a Dog and Pony show to hand Romney the Nomination and get in his Admin’s good graces…I’m calling shenanigans!!!!

10 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:17:08 AM byjakerobins

You do that, chum. I’m sure the caucus Captains have been going over Freeperville with a fine tooth comb waiting to see if they should stop the polling because one or more of you dipshits didn’t like the outcome.

To: Slings and Arrows

Whole ROTTEN MESS was rigged!

Santorum is in the lead .. until greazy @$$ Rove starts ‘orchestrating’ HOW the last two

RoveIndictThis

(Four Hour Late) precincts MUST have counted wrong and .. wouldn’t you know it .. Smarmy RNC chair comes on and announces how ALL the votes had now been ‘found’ and GUESS WHAT? .. MITTENS WINS .. by the exact same amount that he had been losing by! SURPRISE!!

GARBAGE ROVE “AND FOX” are THROUGH .. as far as I am concerned!

Ki$$ My @$$ FOX NEWS!!

30 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:30:39 AM bysillipuddi (“Thieves get rich, Saints get murdered”)

CapsLock4
.

To: goldstategop

Santorum’s a weak candidate and his momentum won’t translate nationally. Why people are even rallying behind this duplicitous goofball, is beyond me.

31 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:31:30 AM byUtmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)

BanHammer
.

To: Free Vulcan

You’re wrong! If we don’t like the outcome, it must be corrupt. Can’t be that the Romney vote tally is close to the 2008 numbers, that he ran a smart campaign (something we shouldn’t pay attention to), and that a caucus process is fairly decentralized and difficult to fix. It’s corrupt! Corrupt!

Freepers can like Mitt or not (I’ve been trying to stomach him till the McCain endorsement raised my level of bile again) – but I do wish people would be a bit more sane.

54 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 3:35:12 AM bysick1 (Don’t fear the freeper)

BanHamster
.
You wish people would be more sane?More sane?
Do you freaking realize where youARE?
It’s like saying (in the midst of a scrum) that you wish hockey players weren’t so damned pushy.

To: Country Patriot

Because ROVE is the Male counterpart of Nancy Pelosi!

He’s the Representative of the California 8th Congressional district and former Speaker of the House?

I havegot to start keeping up with this stuff.

He is every bit as slimy and dis-honest as any DemonRat and the fix is in for ‘his’ candidate Romney!

Rove gave us Obama .. through Bush

What’s the matter, Bunky? Dontcha lurvs your Commander Codpiece no more? You guys used to kiss his ass like it was the Pope’s ring and you were taking your last breath.

and BY GOD .. He is going to SHOVE Romney down our throats whether we like it or not!

Well, it’s still better than having Santorum shoved up your ass.

The B@$$-TURD doesn’t really give a D@MN if Romney or Obama wins because for him .. “It’s All Good”!

He’s an Elitists and part of the “Livin Large” crowd that has Long Ago, taken power and YOU? .. You’re one of “Those” little people!

Otherwise known as “The 99%”.

Shut Up and take what they give you!

(There will never be any other way to dis-lodge people like Rove .. short of a Revolution!)

B@SS-TURDS ALL!

CapsLock2

60 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:09:59 AM bysillipuddi (“Thieves get rich, Saints get murdered”)

To: sillipuddi

Grow up sillipuddi

61 posted on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:11:05 AM byTexas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)

I love it.
Someone on a forum where the go-to words are “DemonRATS”, “Obamination”, “Kenyan”, and worse , telling someoneelse on that forum to “grow up”.
Jim Rob delivers a post-Iowa jeremiad, gratutious mooslime-baiting, and Pee Party insanity after the fold-e-rol.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Iowa Caucasians Caucus Edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Putrid Potpourri edition

Morning everyone – it’s that time again – we need to bring some of the aging drums of creepy up from the back and dispose of them.

Let’s get the air scrubbers cranked up, because our first blast from the recent past is –

ICE, ICE, baby!

Homeland Security suspends immigration agreements with Ariz. police
The Washington Times ^ | June 25,2012 | By Stephen Dinan

Posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:31:56 PM by Hojczyk

The Obama administration said Monday it is suspending existing agreements with Arizona police over enforcement of federal immigration laws, and said it has issued a directive telling federal authorities to decline many of the calls reporting illegal immigrants that the Homeland Security Department may get from Arizona police.

Administration officials, speaking on condition they not be named, told reporters they expect to see an increase in the number of calls they get from Arizona police — but that won’t change President Obama’s decision to limit whom the government actually tries to detain and deport.

“We will not be issuing detainers on individuals unless they clearly meet our defined priorities,” one official said in a telephone briefing.

The official said that despite the increased number of calls, which presumably means more illegal immigrants being reported, the Homeland Security Department is unlikely to detain a significantly higher number of people and won’t be boosting personnel to handle the new calls.

1 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:32:00 PM by Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk

Direct violation of the oath of office on the part of every cabinet member and Obama himself.

Every one of them should be arrested.

2 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:33:41 PM by rarestia (It’s time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
I’ve got a great idea – you should make a Citizen’s Arrest! Do that, and let me know how it comes out – by mail, not in person.

To: rarestia

IMPEACH.

7 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:42:19 PM by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)

And how did that work out for you mental defectives the last time you tried it (in 1998)?
Clinton_approval_rating
Knock yourselves out.

To:Hojczyk

Time for the state to go rogue.

Reminds me of an old joke that I’ll rework for this situation:

A Californian, an Arizonan, and a Mexican national are walking along the beach at Padre island, and discover a half-buried oil lamp. One quick rub later, a Djinn appears and grants them each one wish.

The Mexican national says: “I wish to be with my family, and for my villiage to have sufficient food and money for no one to ever have to go away to work again.

*BOOM* – he disappears. “Wish granted” says the Djinn.

The Arizonan is next. He says: “I’m tired of all these illegals trying to come into my state – I want a wall around it to stop all the wetbacks out and keep Real Americans like me in.

*BOOM* – he disappears. “Wish granted” says the Djinn.

The Californian gets a thoughtful look on his face and says to the Djinn: “Tell me about that wall, please.”

The Djinn says: “It is a hundred feet high and thirty feet thick, and is completely impregnable!”

The Californian smiles, and says: “OK. Fill it with water.”

…immigrant-rights groups saying they led to abuses…

So sue…where are the records of abuse?

9 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:42:59 PM by EBH (Obama took away your American Dreams and replaced them with “Dreams from My (his) Father”.)

To: gunner03

At what point will the states tell the feds to play in the street.The states need to say “fine we will not send you any more tax revenue”. It’s getting close to picking which side you are on.

21 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 1:57:23 PM by Lets Roll NOW (A baby isn’t a punishment, Obama is)

Arizona
Federal spending received for every tax dollar paid: $1.46
Federal spending received for every tax dollar paid per capita: $2.0
Tear your ass.

To: Hojczyk

Secession anyone???

50 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 2:23:28 PM by eak3

And how well did that work out for you thimble-headed gherkins the last time you tried it?
And these chuckleheads accuse other people of Treason…

To: Hojczyk

Under what conditions can the gov declare Martial law and call out the national guard?

I can answer that one for you – the U.S Army – when a Governor declares Secession.

…Just looking toward the future.

93 posted on Monday, June 25, 2012 4:15:17 PM by hoosiermama ( Obama: ” born in Kenya.”.. he’s lying now or then?)

No, you’re looking toward the past – 1861, to be exact.
More random tomfoolery after the Black Beast of AAARRRGGHHHHHHHH…

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Putrid Potpourri edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “You’re the last one, Mr. Gingrinch” edition

Good morning, sleepyheads – let me get all the party favours and confetti swept out of the airlock, and we’ll get to the more recent stuff.

First up – Jim Rob isstillthrowing a hissy fit about Romney.

Me? I can’twait for the day Romney gets the nomination. We’ll have to all work double shifts to clean the exploding head detritus off the iso chamber walls.

The day the tea party embraces Mitt Romney is the day the tea party accepts defeat
Vanity | Dec 17, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:08:08 PM byJim Robinson

First there was the Reagan Revolution, then Newt’s Republican Revolution, and now the Tea Party Revolution.

Then the Palin Phenomenon, then the Perry Phenomenon, then the Cain Trainwreck, then the Bachmann-Turner Overreach. How is this trend looking to ya so far, Jimbo?

In each successive revolution, the lovers of liberty threw off a bit more of the yoke of the oppressive ruling class to reestablish some vital part of our God given liberty and freedom.

But enough about Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos

Pro-life, small government, big defense Ronald Reagan set and accomplished the goal of bringing down the socialist Soviet Union as a threat to the world and reestablished free America as the dominate superpower. He rescued America from the hapless Jimmy Carter who had dragged the nation down into to the depths of despair.

And all this time I was thinking thatReagan was president in 1982.

Reagan taught us that our best years were indeed yet to come. He reinvigorated our economy by reducing government regulations and taxes and created a free market environment ripe for capitalism to flourish.

Um – the corporate giveaways and capital gains tax cuts occurred in 1981.

A lover of life and freedom, he fought off the socialists and merchants of doom and death at every turn

Nah – that was just him confusing movies he was in with reality.

and sparked the beginning of the decades long Reagan Economy. He was a champion of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and he delivered us from evil.

While sleeping at Cabinet meetings and ony waking to spin multiple plates on sticks while singing the Catalina Magdelina Hoopensteiner Wallendiner song, yes, yes, we get it.

Pro-life, small government, big defense Reaganite, Newt Gingrich, set and accomplished the major goal of wresting the congressional majority away from the socialist Democrats who had held it for forty years. His conservative Republican Revolution cut the taxes, cut the spending, cut the deficit, cut unemployment, blocked President Clinton’s progressive agenda, blocked HillaryCare, reformed welfare, defended life, and balanced the budget four years running, ensuring that the Reagan Economy flourished and stretched throughout his term and beyond.

Mitt Romney set goals of protecting and sustaining abortion as safe and legal in America. He sought to be more radical than Ted Kennedy in respects to “gay rights.” He swore to defend Massachusetts’ strict gun-control laws that “kept us safe” and promised not to chip away at them. He set and accomplished the goal of bringing big government healthcare solutions to his state and mandating that all formerly free citizens must purchase a government approved product or suffer a tax penalty. He loves mandates against the people.

He stated that he was an independent during Reagan-Bush and he was not returning to Reagan-Bush. And he didn’t. Instead, he delivered taxpayer funded abortion, gay marriage, gun-control, socialized healthcare, busted budgets, ruined economy, liberal activist judges and a destroyed Republican label.

It’s funny as fuck, you bunch of losers complaining aboutsomebody else destroying the “Republican Label”.

Nice of you to admit that it’s just another product with a shitty ad campaign, though.

Romney was and is demonstrably per record an anti-Reagan, pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gay agenda, pro-gun-control, anti-liberty, pro-socialist healthcare, mandate-loving, liberal judge appointing, budget busting progressive.

He is without a doubt the exact opposite of Reagan, Gingrich, the Reagan Revolution, the Republican Revolution and the Tea Party Revolution.

If the Tea Party now embraces Romney, it will have accepted defeat and surrendered to the ruling class.

There is a reason why the elite establishment GOPers are pushing the anti-Reagan Romney and rejecting the pro-life, Reaganite Newt Gingrich. And I guarantee you, it’s not in the best interest of the Tea Party or the Liberty we seek.

Not on my watch!! No Romney, no way!!

(Dec 29)But the Rasmussen Reports survey contained additional positive data for Romney. The poll showed 75 percent of those who identified themselves with the tea party movement supported Romney over Obama.

Why does the Tea Party hate America?

Rebellion is brewing!!

1 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:08:13 PM byJim Robinson
That’s just a hole in your colostomy bag.

To: Jim Robinson
If the Tea Party now embraces Romney, it will have accepted defeat and surrendered to the ruling class.

What if Romney eventually becomes the GOP nominee, and in Nov. ’12 it’s either him or another 4 years of America’s Chickens Coming Home to Roost?

DangerClose

Should the Tea Party very begrudgingly mumble some kind of wet napkin support for Romney, or write off the White House and focus on Conservative House/Senate candidates to thwart the Executive Branch?

Just askin’

24 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:26:57 PM byDTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: montyspython
What don’t you understand regarding the term ZOT?

If people get ZOT’d merely for expressing a different opinion, you don’t have to ZOT me. I’m outta here.

(Proud to be FReeper since Dec 3, 1997)

—-

Send treats to the troops…
Great becauseyou did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirelyfree service)

28 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:30:15 PM byJCG
To: JCG

bye

33 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:31:50 PM byJim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
Heh.

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

> What the Tea Party needs is to pack the Congress with like minded conservatives.

Excellent point and one that bears repeating.

I’m not spending anything on the Presidential race. The field ranges from iffy to horrible. I’m saving my bucks to spend on Congressional races where we have a chance to turn the tide.

I suggest we all do the same. Congress is where we can override Zer0 or a capitulating RINO.

50 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:40:29 PM byVictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)

I see you guys haven’t figured it out yet.The more bugfuck crazy you are, the less people will vote for you.
And whereas in most professions these would be considerable drawbacks, inchartered accountancy Tea Prty politics, they are a positive boon.

To: JCG

I remember a time not too long ago when Ann Coulter was welcomed at FR; there are still pictures of her with FR members somewhere back in the archives. But here she is, solidly in bed with Romney and the other northeastern RINO’s/liberals.

Whether its her love of Chris Cristie (She likes an obese person? Add their two weights together and divide by two and you have that of a normal person) or what, I don’t know. But she has abandoned conservative principles and now joins those who shun Newt and other Tea Party conservatives. Besides the above linked article, she appeared on O’Reilly’s show last night to hammer home her conversion. Even Rudy (whose fate on here we know) has defended Newt which shows how far out in the Boston tide flats Romney has walked.

52 posted on Saturday, December 17, 2011 2:41:41 PM byCedarDave

There you have it.
Ann Coulter – RINO!!!
More Mittens-bashing and much more after the hump.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – “You’re the last one, Mr. Gingrinch” edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Son of the Revenge of the Putrid Potpourri edition

Good morning, gentle people – last clean-up edtion of Obsession starts right now – Let’s upwrap our last presents, shall we?

First up, from November 14th – Freepers notice that President Obama’s poll numbers have changed course and are rising.

“Pollsters can’t be trusted”, sez the Freeperati!“I’ll wait to see what Rasmussen has to say!”

Um – thisis Rasmussen.

Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll (WTH? Hussein rising?)
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 14 November 2011 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 8:56:26 AM byScottinVA

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 23% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Thirty-eight percent (38%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -15 (see trends).

That’s the president’s best Approval Index rating in three months. Still, most voters continue to favor repeal of his primary legislative accomplishment, the health care law.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook

Overall, 50% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president’s job performance. That’s the first time since June that the president has reached the 50% mark. Forty-nine percent (49%) at least somewhat disapprove.

*********************

Monday morning facepalm as Americans appear to be going brain-dead again.
1 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 8:56:32 AM byScottinVA
To: ScottinVA

BHO is going to win reelection. When that happens it’s not going to be pretty.

3 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:01:45 AM bysvcw (God’s Grace – thank you!)
Pretty fucking hilarious is what it’s gonna be.
The post-election edition of Obsession may have to be a two-parter.

To: Tulane

The Kenyan’s poll numbers are rising. Not good.

Tax the rich, blame do nothing congress, blame Wall St, OWS mau maus, 2nd quarter GDP growth, Libya? What could it be?

10 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:06:16 AM byy6162

All of the above, plus a gaggle of GOP condidates better suited for piling out of a tiny car than for debating?

To: throwback
He’s betting on the stupidity of the American people. It’s a pretty good bet.

I completely agree.He’s still the “shiny new bling,” I guess.

18 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:11:39 AM byScottinVA (Hurrah me boys, for FREEDOM! `Tis the risin` o` the moon!)

Fo shizzle.

To: ScottinVA

ALL POLLS, that is without exception all public released polls are for profit marketing tools to shape public opinion. They only work as long as gullible people pay attention to them. Best poll is to ask people you know and what you see from people you learned to trust.

23 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:13:37 AM byMechanicos (Why does the DOE have a SWAT Team?)

Yeah, that makes sense. Ignore national polls andonly poll people who share your views.
Stupidity personified.

To: Mechanicos
Best poll is to ask people you know and what you see from people you learned to trust

I can’t speak for others, but the people I know and trust tend conservative. It won’t be a good representation of the public at large. That’s why I take all those anectotes of “everyone I talk to says he’s toast” with a pound of salt.

26 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:16:58 AM byScottinVA (Hurrah me boys, for FREEDOM! `Tis the risin` o` the moon!)

BanHimSquad
.

To: Mechanicos

Ramussen is by far the most accurate right-leaning pollster…it is a mistake to simply dismiss his polls when they don’t tell you what you want to hear.

35 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:22:28 AM byMoby Grape (Formerly Impeach the Boy…name change necessary after the Marxist won)

FIFY.
Oh – and you’re banned.

To: Longbow1969

The simple reason is that several GOP candidates’ cults, have been using Alinsky tactics against other Republicans.

Instead of against the left.

Ignoring Reagan’s 11th Commandment.

Reagan was right.

39 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 9:24:07 AM byCringing Negativism Network (Evict the unsanitary, violent occupiers. Now.)
To: Tulane

Well I think we’re all greatly underestimating something. For the first time in my life that I can ever remember the “tax the rich” “screw them for their success” is not a just a fringe element of people anymore. What I mean by this is I don’t believe it’s just the OWS people.I think there are people you would not expect in your neighborhoods, daily lives, who secretly are angry at the rich and want them punished.

Maybe because they’re underwater on their mortgages and/or are out of work, or because the banksters played roulette with their 401Ks, and the rich aren’t missing any house payments?

I think there is an undercurrent out there in the country where people who have either stayed stagnant in their salaries or have had financial difficulties are blaming the wealthy for it.

In other breaking news – people who have been mugged are blaming criminals for it. Film at 11.

I’ve never seen anything like that before in America, and its awful. Point is, I think it’d be unwise for the GOP candidates, and the right overall to dismiss the class warfare angle as a singular radical left wing OWS idea. I think it has gained traction, and I think people who don’t identify with the left or the radicalism of it are actually starting to agree with. Which is terrifying.

62 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 10:16:54 AM byhitchwolf
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Simple fact is – allowing the financial sector to police itself is like allowing rapists to practice abstinence.

To: ScottinVA
Good Grief! Would some of you folks get a grip…PLEASE!

I cannot believe some of you people lap up these daily tracking polls the way you do. If Obama and his administration thought they were in such great shape, they wouldn’t be asking Clinton for guidance; they wouldn’t be going full throttle against Cain…yada…yada.

It’s a daily tracking poll for crying out loud. Way too many variables for me to have a conniption fit over.

I swear, the Left must laugh their A$$es off at us.

69 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 10:26:55 AM byArtcore

Yes, Ido laugh my ass off at you.
Don’t like it? Don’t be so fucking risible.

To: ScottinVA

Predictably, the hand-wringers and doom-and-gloomers here on FR are WAY, WAY overreacting to an job approval poll that is clearly an OUTLIER from every other approval poll currently out there. And of course the majority here is already throwing up their hands, waving the white flag of surrender, and more-or-less declaring Obama the victor one full year prior to an election. YOU PEOPLE SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES.

Folks, think about it… Has there been ANY positive news for the country in the past week? NO! Unemployment is still at an alarmingly high 9%, there are still 14 million people out of work, the national debt has increased by $5 TRILLION over the past three years, we’re on the verge of a nuclear Iran, Obama continues to be mired in scandals, etc. etc. Obama’s approval numbers have consistently remained around 44% on every other poll.So did you ever stop to think that perhaps Rasmussen has taken a BAD SAMPLE of popular opinion over the past several days???

Hindsight’s a bitch, innit?

Thursday, December 22, 2011 (4days ago)

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 23% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Thirty-seven percent (37%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -14 (see trends).

That’s the president’s best Approval Index rating since August.

But no, too many of you want to panic, give up, and declare Obama unbeatable. It quite frankly MAKES ME SICK andmakes me not want to post on Free Republic any longer because I don’t need all this extra negativity in my life.

Go piss up a rope.

If there is ever a time to start building a backbone of steel, it’s NOW!!! And QUIT READING AND LISTENING TO THE STATE RUN MEDIA FOR CRYING OUT!!

Somehow the right-leaning Rasmussen has morphed into the “State Run Media”.

Nobody tells meanything.

The media is purposefully going to try to depress you.

They’re hiding behind your couch and justwaiting to jump out and kill your self esteem with snarky comments about how you dress and what TV shows you watch.

They’re going to try to convince you that the economy is improving when it’s NOT, that Obama’s poll numbers are improving when they AREN’T (Heck, let’s not forget that Jimmy frickin’ Carter had a 54% approval rating in Gallup just 10 months before the 1980 election!), and that the GOP candidates are terrible when they AREN’T!

RomneyFudge

The American people all KNOW things are bad right now. Poll after poll is showing 80% of them think the country is going in the wrong direction and even more think the economy STINKS, for crying out loud!

I’m officially making my prediction right now that OBAMA IS TOAST IN 2012 AND WILL LOSE HIS RE-ELECTION BID IN A LANDSLIDE.That’s right… MARK IT DOWN AND BOOK IT.

Done and done.

I also predict that Rasmussen will have Obama’s job approval numbers back around 45% within the next week and may even drop below 40% with the next year.

You’re definitely batting .000 so far.

Thursday, December 22, 2011 (4days ago)

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 23% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Thirty-seven percent (37%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -14 (see trends).

That’s the president’s best Approval Index rating since August.

A LOT can and will happen between now and the November 2012 election. We’re gearing up for yet another deficit reduction battle in Congress with the super-committee over the next couple of weeks, which will almost certainly be a drain on Obama like it was this past summer.

Wall Street Journal: The GOP leaders have somehow managed the remarkable feat of being blamed for opposing a one-year extension of a tax holiday that they are surely going to pass. This is no easy double play. Republicans have also achieved the small miracle of letting [President] Obama position himself as an election-year tax cutter, although he’s spent most of his Presidency promoting tax increases and he would hit the economy with one of the largest tax increases ever in 2013. … At this stage, Republicans would do best to cut their losses and find a way to extend the payroll holiday quickly.

ObamaCare has a very good chance of being struck down and he will be rightly portrayed as a overreaching president who’s signature piece of legislation was ruled unconstitutional.Greece and Italy is almost certain to default at some point, which will send the U.S. stock markets into a tail spin.

And these muon-brained twatwaffles accuse theLeftof “hating America”?

The U.S. has a 50-50 chance of lapsing back into another recession during the next year. Would ANY of this make Obama more re-electable??? HELL NO!!

So get a damn grip, people, and START CAMPAIGNING AGAINST OBAMABY TALKING TO YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS, AND CO-WORKERS RIGHT NOW!!

85 posted on Monday, November 14, 2011 11:16:48 AM byDestroyLiberalism

.IdiotBush
More pig-ignorant Freepertronics after the rift.

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Son of the Revenge of the Putrid Potpourri edition”

Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Revenge of the Putrid Potpourri edition

OK, you lot – pile into the Wayback machine, and travel back in time and space (insert obligatory ELO backwards masking here).

It was a plainer time – a simpler time – a dumber time.

Well, lookee here – it’sDie Harder!

Are we ready to draft Sarah Palin, yet?

Posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 12:20:20 AM byTwoSwords

My first and probably last vanity.

Picture a crowd of people gathered for a political rally. The speaker gives out the old bromide “Why are we here?” The crowd replies in a frenzy. “We want change!” Is this Occupy or a college campus? No, it’s Free Republic. Let’s face it, we all admire our favorite candidates in the Republican field. They all have their strengths and weaknesses, don’t we all. The real problem is that they’re unable to differentiate themselves from each other, in a defining manner. Considering the trampling of rights, unemployment, regulation, immigration, crime, education (lack of and cost of), corruption, lack of leadership, zero (he has to come last, because he’s earned it), why is one of these candidates not really able to capture our desperate imagination? Some will say Cain has done this very thing. Would the majority of them have said the same thing 2-3 months ago? I think not. I think he’s a better man, than I. And I truly mean that. But I don’t sense the killer instinct that is needed right now. Cain is passionate, he’s just not desperate. Desperation is where too many of us living(sic).

Desperation is all right-wingers have.Everything’s a fucking crisis with you yobboes. I’ve been listening to this crap about howfill-in-the-blank is the most horribleist thing EVAR and will immediately cause America to go up like a piece of flash paper – for decades. Know what? Hasn’t happened yet, and isn’t going to happen.

But do you thimble-witted planarians remember and learn? No. You just keep bouncing from manufactured crisis to manufactured crisis, becausethat’s all you have.

We’re debating between Cain, Perry, Romney, Bachmann, Santorum, Gingrigh, Paul. It’s great that we have such a diverse field to choose from and we still haven’t made a decision. The right’s version of diversity is reality. The left’s is checking a box on a form. It will take a person willing to make unlikely political decisions.The left has torn this country usunder(sic) for many a year and many a way and it has to stop. The right has to show it’s(sic) teeth, and if necessary use them. We need to draft Palin. I see no other option where we win back our country from the abject corruption we see daily reported on FR. There are many on this board who consider her a fraud. I never saw that side of her. My favorite study through my life has been military history. I’ve read of the most narcissitic(sic) people in the world over and over, generals and politicians. Ruthless, to the max. Of all the times I’ve seen her on TV I’ve never once sensed a need for political revenge. This, to me, is standard operating procedure for a politician. Never seen it from her. I can’t think of anyone whom I’m not related to that I believe in their goodness and good intentions. No person can be all things to all people (cept Jesus) and maybe she rubbed people the wrong way. Isn’t that normal? I, for one, believe she was put her for a reason, to be President of the United States. I want to re-institute the draft. Just for POTUS.

Paragraphs are your friends.

1 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 12:20:21 AM byTwoSwords

Did I mention you mollusc-brained porkmuffins’ tendency to spew spittle-flecked venom in one long screed until you run out of breath and fall over?

To: TwoSwords

She said no. Leave it at that.

3 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 12:22:08 AM bybuccaneer81(ECOMCON)
This FR version of “ECOMCON” is threatening “Seven Daisies In May”.

To: TwoSwords
Eisenhower said ‘no’ over and over, until he was finally drafted at the nominating convention. He then said ‘yes’.

And didn’t you just shit yourself when he warned us about the military-industrial complex?
If you pasty-witted sockwads had someone with half the integrity of Eisenhower, this election would already be over.
But what do you have? Perry and the pirates.

Don’t count Palin out. She said recently that she could be persuaded to reconsider her decision if she saw an “earthquake” develop. Many of her supporters heard her say that, and immediately responded with a flood of postcards and letters, begging her to reconsider her decision.

Now, even her brother Chuck is trying to get her to change her mind.

VisitSarah Palin’s Earthquake Movement on Facebook, if you’d like to join those who are trying to persuade her to change her mind.

17 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 12:43:22 AM byWindflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: fight_truth_decay

The media has to be dealt with. And I’ve finally figured out a way.

Have you, now?

Quid Pro Quo.

There’s no need forthat kind of language.

At any press conference the interogatee gets to ask the reporter a question

That sounds ripping!

Let’s give it a try, shall we?

and if they don’t like/agree w the answer they move onto the next reporter. If the reporter is able to answer the question responsibly they can ask a question.

30 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 1:12:13 AM byTwoSwords (Has anyone seen my suspension of disbelief pills?)
To: starlifter

“Draft her for what?”

I understand your cynicism. Still let me clarify: draft her for the presidential nomination.

If it becomes apparent that Romney could be the GOP nominee then drafting Palin could become a reality, as the only way to save us all.

CaptainHyperbole

34 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 1:17:09 AM bySarahPalinForPresident2012 (Time to Reload)
Time to change your handle and sig file.

To: TwoSwords
Are we ready to draft Sarah Palin, yet?

I sure am.

Her buoyancy is contagious.

35 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 1:18:11 AM byb9

You leave her flotation devices out of this.

To: Darkwolf377

Exactly. This is why I was so frustrated by the cries of “You’re a hater!” whenever anyone raised any question about Palin here.

Cor blimey, I got so sick of that.

I stopped expressing any support or otherwise for Sarah Palin a few months ago because I didn’t want to be associated with some of those people in any way whatsoever.

They were (and still are, just for a different candidate now) embarrassing.

45 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 1:37:59 AM byAllegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
To: TwoSwords

Glad to see those sacred of Sarah are still here attacking someone else…

Run Sarah Run…I’m with you…she is the only one…

Just be prepared to be endlessly attacked here…they don’t want to take any chance that she might change her mind, so they get vicious at every mention of Sarah running

It’s called “Occupy FreeRepublic”

52 posted on Friday, November 04, 2011 4:25:03 AM byThe Wizard (Madam President is my President now, and in the future)
SpitMyDrink
.
More retro fun after the jim-jam-jumpin’ jive!

Continue reading “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Revenge of the Putrid Potpourri edition”