New Yorker Endorses Kerry

Not that I’d expect anything less from the magazine home of Mr. Hersh, but this is pretty damn extraordinary:

The damage visited upon America, and upon America’s standing in the world, by the Bush Administration’s reckless mishandling of the public trust will not easily be undone. And for many voters the desire to see the damage arrested is reason enough to vote for John Kerry. But the challenger has more to offer than the fact that he is not George W. Bush. In every crucial area of concern to Americans (the economy, health care, the environment, Social Security, the judiciary, national security, foreign policy, the war in Iraq, the fight against terrorism), Kerry offers a clear, corrective alternative to Bush’s curious blend of smugness, radicalism, and demagoguery. Pollsters like to ask voters which candidate they’d most like to have a beer with, and on that metric Bush always wins. We prefer to ask which candidate is better suited to the governance of our nation.

This is the first time the magazine has EVER endorsed a presidential candidate. In the past 80 years, there have been some pretty crucial elections. This, the New Yorker is saying, is the most critical in its history.

A.