Full Retreat On Iraq

Last time I checked Republikkkan Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison was a full32 points ahead of Democratic opponent Barbara Ann Radnofsky and even farther ahead of her Libertarian opponent, Scott Lanier Jamison.

Still, she felt the need to say it waswrong to invade Iraq during last night’s Texas senatorial debate.

“If I knew then what I had known now on the weapons of mass destruction, which was a key reason I voted the way I did, I would not have voted to go into Iraq then,” Hutchison said.

5 thoughts on “Full Retreat On Iraq

  1. Today the online news is running articles of how the Pentagon is admitting that they have failed in Baghdad. (example below)
    That being the case, I can’t help but noting that I (and many others) noted 5 years ago that the middle east has resisted invaders for thousands of years. That part of the world gave us the word “assassin.” I can even remember some people talking before the 2000 election that Bush was looking to invade Iraq to make up for a perceived father’s weakness.
    So which motto should I use:
    I TOLD YOU SO !
    IF GORE WAS RIGHT ON GLOBAL WARNING AND KERRY WAS RIGHT ON IRAQ, BY SIMPLE LOGIC, BUSH WAS WRONG ON BOTH !
    DAMN, I HATE BEING RIGHT ALL THE TIME (adapted from Jurassic Park movie).
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1926809,00.html A day after George Bush conceded for the first time that America may have reached the equivalent of a Tet offensive in Iraq, the Pentagon yesterday admitted defeat in its strategy of securing Baghdad.

  2. but but but how does TEXAS feel?
    i would acept joemental yuck, if kay bailey twit lost.

  3. There is no one TEXAS. There are many and people and institutions here feel all kinds of different about what’s going on in Iraq, in the country and in the state.
    Witness our four ring circus gubernatorial race, for example. This is the week that major newspapers are announcing their endorsements and there’s a pretty wide spread across the candidates. The Dallas Morning News, and according to rumors, the Austin Statesman have endorsed Governor Shithead, the Houston Chronicle is for Grandma, the San Antonio Express News, Fort Worth Star Telegram, Victoria Advocate and Corpus Christi Caller are for Dem Chris Bell, who just might be picking up steam. As far as I know, none of the papers have endorsed Kinky. The Austin Chronicle (for Bell) spoke of Kinky (and someone else) thusly:
    He has no real interest in the crucial details of governance. He has chosen positions out of whim and ignorance (such as martial law on the border, or quickly dissipating a budget “surplus” visible only to him). Along the campaign trail, he has made no effort to learn anything new or from his mistakes. (The last denizen of the Mansion with Friedman’s Know-Nothing approach to governance is now in the White House.)

  4. Here at Public Agenda, we’ve created a new tool to track Americans’ opinions on foreign policy issues, providing a basis for political commentary. Similar to the Consumer Confidence Index, the Foreign Policy Anxiety Indicator provides policy makers, journalists and ordinary citizens with the public’s overall comfort level with America’s place in the world and current foreign policy.
    An essential tool updated twice a year, the Indicator will consistently provide much-needed information on the public’s perception of more than two dozen aspects of international relations.
    In a world strewn with violence and highly-charged international issues, Americans are broadly uneasy about U.S. foreign policy. The September 2006 shows the Foreign Policy Anxiety Indicator at 130 on a scale of 0 to 200, where 0 is the most confident, 200 the most anxious and 100 neutral.
    Eight in 10 Americans feel the world is becoming a more dangerous place for Americans, yet they’re also skeptical about most of the possible solutions, such as creating democracies or global development. Only improved intelligence gathering and energy independence have substantial support, with energy firmly established as a national security problem for the public.
    In fact, the public lacks confidence in many of the measures being taken to ensure America’s security. Less than 33% of Americans give the U.S. government an “A” or a “B” grade for its execution of the following foreign policy issues: reaching goals in Iraq and Afghanistan, maintaining good relationships with Muslim countries and protecting U.S. borders from illegal immigration. And these are just a few of the findings of the survey.
    These are some of the other startling findings:
    – 83 percent say they are worried about the way things are going for the United States in world affairs (35 percent worry “a lot”, with an additional 48 percent saying they worry “somewhat.”)
    – 79 percent say the world is becoming more dangerous for the United States and the American people
    – 69 percent say the United States is doing a fair or poor job in creating a more peaceful and prosperous world
    – 64 percent say the rest of the world sees the United States negatively
    – 58 percent say U.S. relations with the rest of the world are on the wrong track
    Want to learn more? Go to http://www.publicagenda.org/foreignpolicy/index.cfm to download the report.
    Public Agenda is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group devoted to public opinion and public policy. The confidence in U.S. Foreign Policy Index is developed in cooperation with Foreign Affairs with support from the Hewlett and Ford foundations.

Comments are closed.