A Little Love Story For The Day After Valentine’s

Oh, isn’t this sweet

A senior Justice Department official who recently resigned her post bought a nearly $1 million vacation home with a lobbyist for ConocoPhillips months before approving consent decrees that would give the oil company more time to pay millions of dollars in fines and meet pollution-cleanup rules at some of its refineries.

Sue Ellen Wooldridge, former assistant attorney general in charge of environment and natural resources, bought a $980,000 home on Kiawah Island, S.C., last March with ConocoPhillips lobbyist Don R. Duncan. A third owner of the house is J. Steven Griles, a former deputy interior secretary, who has been informed he is a target in the federal investigation of Jack Abramoff’s lobbying activities.


Wooldridge, who earlier served in senior positions at the Interior Department, lives with Griles in Virginia. Her investment with Griles and the oil lobbyist took place on March 13, 2006, property records show, during a wide-ranging Justice Department criminal investigation that involves Griles and lobbyists at Interior. The joint purchase and Wooldridge’s role in the consent decrees were reported yesterday by the Associated Press.


In November 2006, ConocoPhillips reached proposed consent decrees with the federal government and four states that would modify an agreement the company had reached with the Environmental Protection Agency in 2005 to settle charges it was violating the Clean Air Act. The proposed changes, which must be approved by a federal judge overseeing the case, would give the company more time to install equipment and processes that would cost an estimated $525 million to cut emissions at some refineries.

Wooldridge, as head of the Justice Department’s environmental division, signed the agreements on behalf of the federal government.


Wooldridge submitted her resignation from Justice last month, three days after Griles’s lawyer was informed by the department’s criminal division that Griles faces potential criminal charges in connection with his dealings with Abramoff. A Justice spokeswoman has said that Wooldridge returned to the private sector and that her departure was voluntary.


Griles was harshly criticized in a 2004 report from Interior’s inspector general for maintaining ties to lobbying clients who had business before the department. Inspector General Earl E. Devaney found that Griles had used his official position in dealings with clients of his former firm even as he continued to receive payments from the firm amounting to more than $1 million. His report did not draw conclusions about whether Griles broke any law or ethics rules. The Office of Government Ethics, in reviewing the findings, said that, with two possible exceptions, Griles did not violate ethics rules.

Wooldridge, who was deputy chief of staff to the interior secretary and later became solicitor at Interior, provided ethics advice to Griles and advised then-Secretary Gale A. Norton on how she should handle the inspector general’s allegations. She did not tell the inspector general of her personal relationship with Griles, according to sources familiar with the investigation. About August 2002, according to the inspector general’s report, Wooldridge replaced Griles’s special assistant as his ethics screener, a role in which she helped him determine when he should recuse himself from matters that posed a conflict of interest. After Griles’s departure from Interior, Wooldridge disclosed to investigators in the Abramoff probe that she and Griles began dating in February 2003, sources familiar with the probe said.

Wooldridge and Griles both filed amended financial disclosure reports late last year that reported thousands of dollars in gifts and trips they gave one another in 2003. During that time and afterward, Wooldridge was contacting investigators, answering questions and writing a memorandum defending Griles’s activities as deputy at Interior.

5 thoughts on “A Little Love Story For The Day After Valentine’s

  1. The lawyer for the environment was in bed with Conoco. What gets me is that the oil industry at the same time was making record profits – the fines weren’t even a decent slap on the wrist and they were still doing everything to avoid these fines.
    BTW, a $ 1 million house on Kiawah is rather modest compared to its neighbors. With a small area of exception, Kiawah is a gated community on a coastal island that doesn’t allow any of the riff-raff outsiders in (including the descendants of slaves who were forced off their Kiawah land to make room for the multimillion dollar houses). Then its an area where multimillion dollar houses are built on the beach, insured for hurricaine / flood and rebuilt right back on the beach repeatedly with your tax dollars.

  2. About the fines… I’ve worked for gas station owners who would rather give Osama 50 bucks than pay uncle sam 10. I’ve watched people spend 100,000 in legal fees to get out of a 10,000 fine for their station.
    It’s not distrust, it’s absolute contempt for the government.
    This is why corporate charters need to be revocable… because companies have free speech, but can’t go to jail… so we need the corporate death penalty.

  3. Can we expect anything less than stuff like this from this administration? Poor Diogenes would have been destined to forever wander on his quest within the corridors of this mal administration.

  4. mdhatter, I think you’ve got something there. There has to be some curb on corporations, and the death penalty makes sense to me.
    Or else stop giving them the rights of real people, like free speech, especially political free speech. I always thought that part of Buckley v. Valeo which said that it was unconstitutional to restrict corporate speech was wrongly decided.

Comments are closed.