Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

In today’sgaggle, when is a timeline not a timeline?

When Pony Blow says it’s not.

Q The Iraq withdrawal plan announced by Tony Blair, do you see that as a negative sign?

MR. SNOW: No, it indicates that there’s been some progress in Basra.

[snip]

Q Can I follow that, Tony? The plan calls for the British to remove troops as conditions permit. And the initial response from the U.S. was that that’s a model to emulate. But that’s what some have, in fact, been calling for here, is time lines for removal of troops if conditions permit. So why is that model not okay for U.S. troops?

MR. SNOW: No, this is not a time line. And the Prime Minister made it clear it is not a time line. As a matter of fact, what you had is progress first and then the removal. This was not in response to any calendar that had been set by the Parliament or by the Prime Minister. In fact, it had been the result of a judgment.

No Relief for Our Troops!

Q Is there any consideration of having the Brits ease the burden on the U.S. in its own surge in Baghdad and al Anbar?

MR. SNOW: No, these are — they have had separate — as you know, there has been a division of labor within Iraq and people do have separate responsibilities.

2 thoughts on “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

  1. Ruth says:

    British troops had been so successful, they had withdrawn into enclaves from which it was unsafe to emerge, and left most of the south of Iraq unattended. Their withdrawal is an admission they were enabling terrorism, not Iraq citizens.

  2. MapleStreet says:

    Ruth, I never realized it before. As you described the British in Iraq, this sounds a lot like the British in Ireland.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: