Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

Today We GetSnott Stanzel, The Ultimate Third-Stringer, Who Explains That McCain Is Not Chimpy’s Man

Q But just to be clear, The Washington Post claimed this morning that this was an implicit endorsement of McCain; you’re saying, no?

MR. STANZEL: I think the headline writers are a little over-eager. I noticed the headline there and that was my impression of it. I think you should look at the words of the President very carefully.

Q So it wasn’t an endorsement today?

MR. STANZEL: No. I just said that.

Q Because beyond the headline — the story itself called it, I believe, an “implicit endorsement” of McCain.

MR. STANZEL: I’m not sure how you get to that point, so —

Q You don’t believe that?

MR. STANZEL: No, I don’t.

One thought on “Today On Holden’s Obsession With The Gaggle

  1. OT – Just wanted to check in and recommend the Sadly No! CPAC series. But it’s the “Twice Crowned” part you really have to read. Reminds me of Athenae rant. That good.

Comments are closed.