Well, the clolture vote on DADT went over about as well at Free Republic as one would expect, but it’s borne some uglier-than-usual fruit.
Big Jim wishes to make it clear that no ho-mo-sexual
sympathizers are going to be keeping their Free Republic accounts. It’s like he’s trying to get it down to thecreme de démence.
Posted on Saturday, December 18, 2010 1:33:01 PM byJim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
“of how insanely and hysterically homophobic I am…”
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution
“Cause there isn’t anything in the Constitution about fags. I checked twice.”
and you’ll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same “rights” as everyone else.
Dontcha love how this fuckstick putsrights in quotation marks? Like it’s a word that doesn’t really exist?
God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights.
“And that goes double for Negros. As a matter of fact, the Constitution doesn’t say anything about women, either, so fuck ’em. The words are:all men, not “All fudgepackers”, or “All whiny bitches”are created equal.”
In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
You forgot the troops, home schooling, and Mom’s apple pie.
I don’t want it on FR and won’t have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Abortion supports the homosexual agenda on FR? Who knew?
Don’t like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
Boss they are with us orthe Queers, NO in between.
I’m all for the repeal of DADT.Ask(sic)long as we go back to the original standard of NO FAGS IN THE MILITARY!
I worked with a lesbo ( old bag with many mental problems..go figure ) and we got into an argument about fag rights…she said it was not right that her “partner” could not automatically inherit her crap because they could not be legally married. I told her that my wife is not guaranteed my crap if i die and do not leave a will. It would have to go through probate. I told her to do what married people do, and make up a will and durable power of attorney. She thought that was too much to do, and never bothered me again…out of the thousands of fags I have met, only a handful can be remotely considered to be real humans...the rest are mentally deficient, with large amounts of emotional baggage
It is truly a revolting experience when a homo-sexual makes overtures towards me.
Absolutely! Talk about “bitter clingers!” Homos are the most miserable, bitter people I’ve ever had the misfortune of having to work with. Even the closet cases…when things get tough, they start acting bizarre (which is how I figured out what their “preference” was). They’re just a bunch of self-hating little cruds and I can imagine what they’ll do for military morale.
I can’t see their crap being tolerated by tough soldiers and Marines in combat zones. I hope the matter can be dealt with on a personal level, if you know what I mean.
FR is NOT a fricken liberal debating society. It’s a God, Family, Country, Life and Liberty liberal-free zone. If you don’t know already where you stand on these fundamental issues of God-Given Liberty without debate, then you sir are NO conservative!! You are either an evil democrat ally or gutless wonder RINO!!
How many times must I tell you that I do not want it on FR!!!!
Westboro Babptist is loving this thread.
I’ve never said this to another FReeper, but you’re a POS!
You may think you’re joking, but the transvestite agenda is next. The queer agenda never gains a foothold but what the transvestite lobby follows, and I am not kidding.
WSJ On-Line ^ | 12/18/10 | NATHAN HODGE
Posted on Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:13:48 PM byPontiac
The Senate Saturday repealed the military’s ban on gays serving openly in the military, by overturning the policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
Senators voted 63-33 to advance the bill to the floor, passing a 60-vote procedural hurdle. Final passage Saturday afternoon was 65-31.
Being ex military I don’t think this is the catastrophe many would believe except in a political way (it’s a loss for our side and yes the American people).Soldiers have their own way of handling these things and those of you who served well know what I mean.
If I was soldier, I could live with the knowledge someone was gay. I don’t care if they’re doing it, as long as they don’t make it MY business. Live and let live.
But you aren’t a soldier, probably never have been….but you sound a lot like a butt boy
Thanks for the insult… this is why the DADT lost. When you ridicule people instead of making a case against homosexuality, you’ve lost the battle. Our military will survive it.
Several have gotten the zot already today for taking your position. I would proceed with caution.
I’m the only one on here advocating a ban on gays serving in the armed services – the pre-1993 policy and every one else wants to restore a fig leaf. This IS conservatism?
Your various posts (especially #50) demonstrate that you were not in the service. Otherwise, you would understand how life is in the military as men are cheek to jowl with each other in everyday living and having queers now being able to look you over without being reprimanded is going to be one helluva morale problem.
This account has been banned or suspended.