Keep Annoying the Prigs, Holy Father

Happy Easter, stuck-up assholes:

There were certainly none of those trappings on display Thursday at the Casal del Marmo juvenile detention facility in Rome, where the 76-year-old Francis got down on his knees to wash and kiss the feet of 12 inmates, two of them women. The rite re-enacts Jesus’ washing of the feet of his 12 apostles during the Last Supper before his crucifixion, a sign of his love and service to them.

The church’s liturgical law holds that only men can participate in the rite, given that Jesus’ apostles were all male. Priests and bishops have routinely petitioned for exemptions to include women, but the law is clear.

Francis, however, is the church’s chief lawmaker, so in theory he can do whatever he wants.

“The pope does not need anybody’s permission to make exceptions to how ecclesiastical law relates to him,” noted conservative columnist Jimmy Akin in the National Catholic Register. But Akin echoed concerns raised by canon lawyer Edward Peters, an adviser to the Vatican’s high court, that Francis was setting a “questionable example” by simply ignoring the church’s own rules.

“People naturally imitate their leader. That’s the whole point behind Jesus washing the disciples’ feet. He was explicitly and intentionally setting an example for them,” he said. “Pope Francis knows that he is setting an example.”

The inclusion of women in the rite is problematic for some because it could be seen as an opening of sorts to women’s ordination. The Catholic Church restricts the priesthood to men, arguing that Jesus and his 12 apostles were male.

Francis is clearly opposed to women’s ordination. But by washing the feet of women, he jolted traditionalists who for years have been unbending in insisting that the ritual is for men only and proudly holding up as evidence documentation from the Vatican’s liturgy office saying so.

“If someone is washing the feet of any females … he is in violation of the Holy Thursday rubrics,” Peters wrote in a 2006 article that he reposted earlier this month on his blog.

In the face of the pope doing that very thing, Peters and many conservative and traditionalist commentators have found themselves trying to put the best face on a situation they clearly don’t like yet can’t do much about lest they be openly voicing dissent with the pope.

Yeah, this is gonna be fun to watch. They’re supposed to be slavishly loyal to Rome, so they can’t criticize the pope, even when he’s not embodying the ideals of pointless adherence to documentation from the liturgy office.

I mean heavens, the rubrics. Is there anything more important than the rubrics?

A.

3 thoughts on “Keep Annoying the Prigs, Holy Father

  1. mellowjohn says:

    if only men can be priests because all the apostles were male, shouldn’t the priesthood be limited to those who only speak aramaic? after all, none of the original 12 spoke english.

  2. Jay in Oregon says:

    Perhaps Peters wants to take a crack at squaring the Catholic Church’s protection/enabling of child molesters with Matthew 18?
    Fucking Pharisees, all of them. Millstones would be too good.

  3. torteya says:

    Infalibility, bitches!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: