Good morning, gentle people!
The trucks have been unloading drums of toxic Christie Freepitude all week, so I guess we’d better bust some of them open before we run out of storage space.
I stared checking Freeperville immediately after the Christie hullabaloo started, but it was all “GATEBOOKGATESBOOKIMPEACHIMPEACH!!1!”. A couple of them muttered “Good riddance to bad RINOs” on three-comment threads, but otherwise it was like none of it had ever happened.
With the belated realization that nobody but Clark and his publishers gives a flying fuck about whether or not he liked his boss, they finally deigned to notice what the real world was abuzz about.
What REALLY kicked off the shitstorm was this:
Boehner: Christie remains presidential contender
Miami Herald ^ | 1/9/14 | Associated PressPosted on 1/9/2014 12:04:51 PM by jimbo123
House Speaker John Boehner says he believes Chris Christie remains a serious contender for the Republican 2016 presidential nomination, despite the traffic jam scandal engulfing the New Jersey governor.
Reporters asked Boehner about Christie’s problems on Thursday, even as the governor was holding a news conference in Trenton, N.J.
*****************************************
Florence Genova was unavailable for comment.
To: jimbo123In your dreams, Baby Boehner. Christie’s criminality makes him a NON-contender and may be an answer to Tea Party prayers.
To: jimbo123Typical of Boehner – one RINO trying to protect another.
To: MNGalGOPe tears actually taste sweeter than RAT tears these days. MORE!
To: jimbo123John Boehner says he believes Chris Christie remains a serious contender for the Republican 2016 presidential nominationNo, Boehner, he doesn’t. Time to get to work making Jeb your GOPe poster boy.
To: novembersladyCruz/Gowdy is looking like a strong ticket.
And, being actual conservatives, they will work to make the downticket conservatives an exciting straight-Repub punch.
But it turns out the vote fraud possibilites are endless, since Colorado has shown that clerks can query the database of votes cast at will.
OH NOES!!! They can commit fraud by looking at vote tallies? Proof positive that anyone who looks at vote totals is committing voter fraud! Those tallies should be locked away forever where no one can ever see them!
They were looking at early votes cast to determine how many votes they needed to get the fix in.
Why bother? Just put in a couple hundred thousand Democratic votes. Easy peasy.
Voting machine databases are supposed to be LOCKED, but turns out that ain’t so. Box of Stashed Ballots Could Invalidate Contested Broomfield Election [vote fraud Colorado ]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3109672/posts ..Records also indicate that Susek or a city employee repeatedly logged into the ballot accounting database as the administrator and downloaded vote tallies repeatedly for two weeks before the Nov. 5 election.
Access to early voting records give the RATS data to fraud with.
Assuming these machines with open access to determine trends, this is catastrophic. The FEC needs to answer just how many vote machine databases are accessible for user-driven calculations.
Here’s a “user-driven calculation” for you. You lost the last two presidential elections, because “tea party”.
This access is probably how Zero knew how many to bus in to enact THE FIX.
Methinks the “airlock door” needs to look more like the ones used on MST3K.
What is Clarkbook? Ought that be Gatesbook?
muddy – quite right. Brain fart. Fixed.
Tommy
Oh, Tommy. I can’t believe you missed an opportunity to mock one of these morons for introducing himself to his neighbors. Of course he did. Court order when a pederast moves into a new neighborhood.
First, Is there anyone that is pure enough for them to support?
Second, that whole A team thing, didn’t we try that in Iraq and Afghanistan? Yeah, that will work out well. Why do they always assume the vets are with them?
Great rundown Tommy. Some of that toxic waste is pretty rank. Haven’t been on the internets much lately, recovering from a car accident. I’m on the mend, so no worries on that score.
Iceblue2. They should definitely not be making assumptions about the vets. I have a good friend currently deployed in Afghanistan, he’s about as liberal as it gets.