‘Posted on the Internet’

Oh, God, get with the program already:

Let’s recount what evidence the paper had at that point.

1) An eyewitness account called in by an editorial aide shortly
after the incident occurred. The aide said that the cop actuallydid pull out a gun, not that he “may” have; and

2) Video and photos that clearly corroborate the eyewitness account of thePostnewsroom employee.

Yet thePoststill couldn’t bring itself to say that an
officer had actually taken out his gun at a snowball fight. Not, at
least, until the print editions hit the streets over the next couple of
days—which is among the great points made on this issue by blogger bsom.

How’d this happen? Not clear at this point. Zapotosky has failed to
return numerous requests for comment, as has top local editorEmilio Garcia-Ruiz.

Yet the reason why thePostscrewed this up is that they all have linkophobia. If you link to an outlet—such as, God forbid, theWashington City Paper—you’ve
lost. You got scooped and all your colleagues are going to look down on
you. Linking is a huge sign of weakness—you just can’t do it. Far
better to, like, call a top police official, buy his version of events,
and just place it in a post, regardless of the contradicting evidence
that’s already posted elsewhere.

Take a close look at that 10:20 update on the maybe-gun-pulling cop:
“The plainclothes D.C. police detective may have unholstered his pistol
during the confrontation with participants in the huge snowball fight, based on video and photos posted on the Internet.”

Bold and italics are mine. They’re mine because this is the most
cowardly, selfish, arrogant news conduct out there today. What the fuck
is “video and photos posted on the Internet”? How does that help
readers? It’s as if I can go to http://www.internet.com, and there, on the
first screen, will be the video and photos of the snowball fight and
the maybe-gun-wielding cop. “Posted on the Internet” would be
acceptable if this were 1997.

The reporters used this hazy phrasing because they were too
chicken-shit to do something that we all have learned to do over the
past, say, decade or more. And that’s to link to competitors and
acknowledge their contributions to stories.

Look, nobody likes admitting they got stomped. But the Post in part got stomped because it refused to believe its own editorial aide, and that’s just stupid. Sack up, admit you got stomped, and move. Flap around, wank in public, and this becomes a two-week embarrassment to us all.

But knowing big-city papers and how they treat their poorer competitors the way I do, they’d rather die than acknowledge the smaller papers exist. Tell them you work somewhere with a lesser circ and you’ll get a pat on the head, like what you do isn’t EXACTLY the same thing they do, like you don’t understand some mythical thing. What the fuck ever. You can go and take the story away from your competitors by reporting it better, but it’s cowardice in the extreme to ignore facts right in front of your face because you just don’ wanna. How does that help you in any way?

ViaDan.

A.

5 thoughts on “‘Posted on the Internet’

  1. Adrastos says:

    We have the same dynamic here in NOLA between the Picayune and the weekly Gambit, which is essentially a better paper. The TP for the first time recently mentioned the name of my friend Clancy DuBos who is the top political analyst in the are. The did not, however, mention that he’s the publisher and owner of the Weekly, they mentioned him as a noted teevee pundit.

  2. RAM says:

    Dailies have been ripping weeklies off forever. It’s just how they roll. One time we broke a story about a local issue and misspelled one of the principals’ names. Oddly enough, the local daily and the local radio station made the same error in their stories. It was a really, really amazing coincidence.
    What makes the Post’s actions so deplorable is that they didn’t believe their own person who was on the scene and called in an eyewitness report. That’s what takes this to a whole ‘nother level of incompetence. But we live in the Era of Unaccountability, so I suspect not one thing will happen to the idiots who perpetrated this outrage against journalism and common sense. Because that’s also how they roll.

  3. pansypoo says:

    as our paper became close to fux gnews suckatude editorialy, the gasping liberals make it somewhat readable.

  4. MapleStreet says:

    All they really had to do was say “based on videos posted on you tube.” Of course, then they would have to do some investigative work themselves to find them.
    And I’m still wondering, how many DC cops drive Humvees? Seems like a rather pricey car that costs a lot to drive (at 1/2 a mile per gallon, those $3 gallons start adding up fast).

  5. Kaleberg says:

    Why am I thinking of the old joke:
    A: B, I thought you were dead!
    B: Nope. As you can see, I’m alive.
    A: But C said you were dead, and he’s a much more reliable source than you are.
    I think this got written down around 400 BC, but it’s surely a much older joke than that.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: