Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Red-eye edition

Sitting here at 4:00AM trying to make synapses fire in some kind of order. This’ll freaking teach me to procrastinate..

Let’s just suit up and jump in – maybe something will come to me.

Well, let’s start with –Hammer that Kraut!

Krauthammer: Palin endorsing O’Donnell is destructive
therightscoop ^ | 09/13/2010 | therightscoop

Posted onMonday, September 13, 2010 8:46:54 PM byRational Thought

Actually, he said it was capricious and destructive and he called Demint’s endorsement of O’Donnell irresponsible. Wow!

Video @ link.

Krauthammer has never liked Gov. Palin, but now also criticizing Jim DeMint?

Krauthammer is making the argument that a Liberal Republican is better than no Republican. Well, Krauthammer seems to have forgotten two Senators named Specter and Jeffords. They certainly worked out well.

The foregone conclusion that Castle is a “shoe-in” in the general is flawed. After the offensive smear campaign run against O’Donnell, I can’t imagine Tea Party supporters rushing to the polls to support Castle in the General Election, meaning, he would have to rely upon large support from Democrat voters.

On the other hand, O’Donnell could very well win the General Election with a highly motivated base in a smaller population state.

It certainly seems the battle lines have been drawn; The Tea Party versus The Establishment.

1 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 8:46:59 PM byRational Thought
To: Rational Thought

Krauthammer supported Moslem Obama (the undocumented one)
in the last election.

He falls in love with sociopaths who blind him, it seems.

5 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 8:50:53 PM byDiogenesis(‘Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.’ – Optimus Prime)

They rewrite history at the drop of a hat, don’t they? Of course, what do you expect from someone who takes his philosophical point of view from an animated cartoon robot?
To: Rational Thought

Krauthammer is a Democrat.

9 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 8:51:43 PM byNovember 2010
Of course he is. Now you just go have a little lie-down.
To: pissant
Krauthammer’s error is that he’s a rich, crippled guy riding around in a motorized wheelchair

I thought that was a disability, not an error. Plus, he gets all the good parking spaces. Bastard!
~ while she’s a young single woman with problems with student debt, federal income taxes and a mortgage.

She’s not rich. But she has a current life experience that relates well to the current life experience of the rapidly growing class of former working or middle class people who have been driven to unemployment, bankruptcy and out of their homes.

The Kraut cannot relate to this at all.

I do believe the voters can and will understand that she, not the Democrat candidate, shares their concerns!

15 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 8:54:24 PM bymuawiyah
To: Diogenesis

He prefers sociopathic body servants to push his wheelchairs. They do their jobs in silence and don’t bother him.

18 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 8:55:58 PM bymuawiyah
Sociopaths are seldom silent. Take you, for example. You hate cripples, and they’re not really people anyway, so screw ’em.
To: School of Rational Thought

Anyone who mentions Krauthammer’s disability is way off base. What does his being in a wheelchair have to do with his judgment? Geez…

58 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 9:39:11 PM byMountain Mary (Ryan/Bachmann 2012)
To: muawiyah
Yes, I do trust Bill Kristol, both personally and professionally.

Read the article. The facts are undeniable… and now even O’Donnell does not deny them.

Read the article.

51 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 9:35:13 PM byMindBender26 (Fighting the “con” in Conservatism on FR, since 1998.)
Uh oh.
To: bwc2221
Read the article.

She is a scammer.

Ariana Huffington was once the most darling of all Conservatives… until she got where she could do some damage.

Read the article.

She is a scammer.

How do we know she is a Conservative? Because she says she is. How do we know Obama is a Christian, because he and the Rev. Wright say he is… and they are willing to swear to it on a stack of Bibles.

Read the article.

67 posted on Monday, September 13, 2010 9:49:11 PM byMindBender26 (Fighting the “con” in Conservatism on FR, since 1998.)
More under the fold..

Next , it’s –Uh oh. Who to side with??‏
Bikini-clad strippers protest church in rural Ohio

Posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:22:33 AM byConservativeStatement

WARSAW, Ohio – Strippers dressed in bikinis sunbathe in lawn chairs, their backs turned toward the gray clapboard church where men in ties and women in full-length skirts flock to Sunday morning services.

The strippers, fueled by Cheetos and nicotine, are protesting a fundamentalist Christian church whose Bible-brandishing congregants have picketed the club where they work. The dancers roll up with signs carrying messages adapted from Scripture, such as “Do unto others as you would have done unto you,” to counter church members who for four years have photographed license plates of patrons and asked them if their mothers and wives know their whereabouts.

The dueling demonstrations play out in central Ohio, where nine miles of cornfields and Amish-buggy crossing signs separate The Fox Hole strip club from New Beginnings Ministries.
1 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:22:35 AM byConservativeStatement
Jesus, or teh bewbies? Oh my daughters! Oh my ducats!!
To: ConservativeStatement; All.
I was sure there would be pictures to better judge the issues here..
2 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:24:55 AM byel_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots at best!!!)
I think ConservativeStatement has gotten to the crux of the biscuit. If they’regood-looking strippers, the Church can go fuck itself. Not good-looking enough? Straight to Hell.
To: ConservativeStatement
I may not agree with what they say, but I admire the way they say it...
4 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:27:02 AM bymquinn (Obama’s supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
That’s one “Not Guilty”
To: el_texicano

There were previous posts about this. The pics would only appeal to folks who like their strippers with c-section and appendectomy scars…

5 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:27:20 AM byJoe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
…and one “Guilty”. This is exciting.
To: el_texicano

Yahoo has pictures.Jury is hung.

8 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:27:37 AM byEQAndyBuzz (Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010
You wish.
To: ConservativeStatement

The Strippers need to stay off the donuts.

11 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:30:33 AM bybmwcyle (It is Satan’s fault)
To: Joe 6-pack

You forgot flab. They look a little “bouncy” in the wrong places.

15 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:31:21 AM byDJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
So it’s “Guilty”, then?
Just for perspective – here are the people who are passing judgment on other people’s looks :
They sure look Guilty to me.
To: Frantzie
They should spend their Sunday mornings doing situps and crunches instead of protesting.

The only crunches these girls have seen are Cap’n.

25 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:40:38 AM byLazamataz (“We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them.” Lazamataz, 2005)
To: politicalmerc; maddog55; dalight; bmwcyle; A_Former_Democrat; DJ MacWoW; mountn man; VRWCmember; …

I debated wheter to post that under the picture, but it seems some of my fellow Freepers have an even harsher judgment.

26 posted on Friday, August 27, 2010 8:43:52 AM byPaleo Conservative
I thought as much.
Lastly, it’s –Bag and baggage‏!
Jeff Perry blows off Sarah Palin as Tea-mate (Mass ‘Tea Partier’ now disowning Tea Party)
Boston Herald ^ | 9/22/10 | Edward Mason

Posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:38:49 AM bynhwingut

Republican Jeff Perry, a self-proclaimed Tea Party member, said he doesn’t want former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to campaign for himbecause of the baggage she would bring, after dismissing the former vice presidential candidate as an “entertainer” in a TV interview.

“I don’t want to interject the debate over the national Tea Party with my race about my district,” said Perry, seeking to replace U.S. Rep. William Delahunt. “I’m trying not to interject a national debate that would distract from my message.”


Sounds a lot like Scott Brown. Use the Tea Party. Then distance yourself.
1 posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:38:53 AM bynhwingut
To: nhwingut

Fine with me. Sarah’s time and energy is extremely limited and extremely precious.

If this dork doesn’t want her help, I am sure there are many others who do.

3 posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:42:38 AM byRonin (If it were not so gruesomely malevolent, Islam would just be silly.)
I didn’t want to go to your stupid old party anyway. So there!
To: nhwingut; All

on the other hand, if you prefer to be in lock-step, there is always the Democrat Party. Or are we going to add an ideological litmus test to Tea Party members now?

7 posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:49:14 AM byj.argese (Liberal thought process = oxymoron)
To: Dr. Sivana

I’m from Mass. I get the politics. Of course Palin would not be a net plus for Perry.

But the question was a setup. Just like asking a Dem in TX if they want Obama to campaign for them.

But you don’t have to go so low as to call her “an entertainer.”There are many ways to get around the question.

10 posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:59:03 AM bynhwingut (Palin/Bachmann ’12)
“We’vve already established what youare, madam. Now we’re merely haggling over price.”
To: nhwingut

It makes me wonder if there is something in his background that he doesn’t want discovered by the national press. Sarah Palin shines a huge light on candidates and maybe he prefers to keep the lights dim.

13 posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:04:37 AM bycarmody
Yeah, baby!! I love it when Freepers talk about Sarah’s huge headlights.
To: nhwingut
Republican Jeff Perry, a self-proclaimed Tea Party member

What would a self-proclaimed “Republican” and self-proclaimed “Tea Party member”from Massachusetts, know about either?

24 posted on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 7:21:16 AM byROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate: Republicans freed the slaves Month.)
Yes, folks – teabaggers really ARE that stupid.

Well – out of time for real now. I’ll be around…

2 thoughts on “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Red-eye edition

  1. The original tea partiers disguised themselves as Mohawks. So why do today’s “tea partiers” dress as colonial-era white guys?
    Ooops, I think I just answered my own question.

  2. Its amazing how they miss the poink that the 2 ladies in the photo aren’t there to titillate (?sp). They were normal folk dressing in a way to:
    Attract attention – check
    Not be indecent by community standards – check
    Just enough to likely bother / offend the people of the church – check
    Although if this was done in the last few months, I sure hope they brought plenty of sunscreen and water.

Comments are closed.