Exploitive, ignorant media bastards… I mean those other guys…

Yes, that’s right. The media of which we are not part of has exploited something that they don’t know anything about, which we know even less about, but feel compelled to write about to condemn them.

I rarely, if ever, pick on student journalism. It’s not because they’re kids or because I have a soft spot for student media or because I work with the student newspaper out here. It’s because most people have their own personal version of the “bad fashion” moment from college, and when you work for a media outlet, that moment tends to get amplified. However, when you swing and miss this hard, it’s kind of hard not to feel the breeze and comment on it.

I agree that the students at the Daily Targum, the Rutgers student newspaper, have every right to say what ever it is they want to say. That’s their First Amendment right. I also agree that when people exploit a tragedy, it’s reprehensible and often smacks of the basest form of opportunism. I also agree that as the paper of record for that university, they had to say something about this, lest they be deemed an irrelevant and toothless watchdog in their community.

But, holy fail, Batman…

“The mistake was that Clementi’s death should not have been turned into a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender protest for gay rights and safe spaces at the University. Robert O’Brien, Department of Anthropology assistant instructor, led the rally as he chanted, “Not safe in dorms, not safe at Rutgers.” Essentially, an angry mob fending for their rights turned the death of a young boy into a cause for “safe spaces” for gays across the University – all the while, these spaces already existed.”

These spaces might exist, but the place in which a student was supposed to feel safest of all (his dorm room), he was recorded in the middle of a sexual act that was then broadcast to others. The safe spaces and educational efforts and punishments associated with bullying apparently were so great and so grand that his roommate felt no compunction about essentially outing him, American Pie style. Even more, neither of the students involved in this incident has been expelled for their part in this recording.

“The focal point of Clementi’s tragic death should have been a boy’s inability to deal with the hardships of life. And yet the news and certain organizations picked this up and carried it into the ranks of general causes for major social groups – for their profit.’

The hardships of life? As in what? By all accounts, he had a solid home life, attended a decent school, had no horrific financial/social/educational problems or other “hardships” besides being gay in a world that isn’t all that accepting. I’m also not sure as to how these “media organizations” are exploiting his death for profit. Perhaps I’m not close enough to the campus to see the “for 50 cents a day, you can keep a gay kid from killing himself” ads on TV.

“We did not know Tyler. It was barely three weeks into his first year at the University, and most of his neighbors in his residence hall barely knew him. Turning his death into a push for gay rights is a fallacy. Homosexuality is not the only reason for which people kill themselves. In this case, it might have pushed Clementi over the edge, but the fact that he was gay should by no means turn his death into a march for safe spaces.”

So wait… Hold on… After spending a page and a half toasting the media who didn’t know the kid for turning his death into a speculation-fueled agenda-palooza for gay rights, NOW you pony up the fact you didn’t know the guy and are speculating as to his motives? And then you have the balls to say “Oh, and even though we don’t know him, we can pretty much rule out being gay as the reason he killed himself.”You think so, doctor?

I don’t know what it’s like to be gay. I can play the “I have gay friends and…” card but that’s bullshit too. What I can tell you is what it’s like to be an 18-year-old kid who went to college and was afraid of everything. Dad’s marching orders were pretty simple: “Don’t bring shame on the family.” I’m sure other families have told other kids something fairly similar, or implied it through their actions and relationships.

In other words, don’t get arrested, don’t get kicked out, don’t knock up a girl, don’t flunk a class and so on and so on.

Every time I was at a house party that got busted, blew through red light on my scooter, brought a girl back to my room for an overnight visit or other things that might be more than frowned upon, I could hear Dad: “Don’t bring shame on the family.” Thus, being caught at something that I would have to explain to the folks or that might land me in a less-than-positive set of circumstances made my heart beat a little faster and my throat tighten a little more.

And those were all things that in most circles are more socially acceptable than being gay.

If you asked Tyler Clementi’s parents if they would have rather had an alive kid who was gay and webcast having gay sex at college or a dead kid, I’d place my wager on the alive kid side. If you asked my parents if they’d have wished I’d be dead rather than busted at a party, an unwed father or a speed demon on two wheels, I know which way they’d go too.

Maybe the kid would have grown up to be a quiet non-activist gay man who never spoke out, kept mostly in the shadows, if not the closet and had a great beard life. Maybe he would have abhorred the attention he was getting as a poster kid on both sides of the gay-rights issue. The point is that I don’t know, you don’t know and the kids at the Daily Targum sure as hell don’t know.

What we do know is that shortly after being outed via webcast by his roommate, he sought recourse through gay chat rooms, found none, felt something inside and killed himself. While other mitigating circumstances might have been present, anyone with half a brain should understand that you can draw a pretty direct line from point A to point B.

And we should do whatever is possible to draw attention to these facts, punish those involved and press for improved acceptance and safety for all.

5 thoughts on “Exploitive, ignorant media bastards… I mean those other guys…

  1. MapleStreet says:

    The proximate cause of his suicide shouldn’t have been highlighted? COME ON !
    Not only was he outed to the world (when he hadn’t told his folks),
    But lets take “the gay” out of this.
    Lets say a female student had heterosexual sex in her dorm – plain vanilla, missionary position. A tape was secretly made of the event and posted on You Tube complete with enough information to identify her.
    Do you (that is the newspaper) want to tell me that didn’t have the potential to be extremely traumatic to her. Do you want to tell me that there wouldn’t have been campus protests, etc.?

  2. MapleStreet says:

    May I add that under the circumstances, the quote from the student newspaper (which I assume covers all the campus and is run with required student funds) is pretty good evidence that harassment may exist on the campus.

  3. tadcf says:

    Important Announcement: We Need You
    Today, this country is faced with the typical problem of the political party in charge losing its voting strength in the mid-term election. This situation has occurred with some regularity in recent U.S. history. But, this election is different. We’ve witnessed the worst recession (some say depression) since the 30’s and 40’s. And, of course, severe unemployment and economic despair may cause many citizens to think that the Administration should take a different tact. However, it’s a matter of whether President Obama is going to have a Congressional team to allow him to continue with the recovery, or whether we elect more Republicans (and in some cases extreme Conservatives) which would radically change the complexion of the Congress, creating a reactionary movement back to the situation we were in before Barak Obama became President.
    Many say, “What has he done for us?” Or, “Shouldn’t he do more, or at least something different?” There may be various answers to these questions in our electorate, but many over-look what President Obama and the a friendly House of Representatives, despite a filibuster-crazy Senate, has accomplished anyway:
    Decrease in national debt by 8% .
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/13/politics/washingtonpost/main6391441.shtml
    This has been accompanied a stabilization of the Dow Jones Average at above 10,000.
    Created a health care program—although flawed, some may say—which will provide protection for an estimated 45 million people without insurance, or under-insured. Sure, health care may not be an important issue to the 80% of Americans already covered, but what about those who have no
    such protection? How many people would otherwise die?.
    Although unemployment is still unacceptably high, the Obama administration has halted this
    increase which was occurring when President Obama took office. We are at a pinnacle like has
    never occurred in our recent experience. It is no longer necessary just to create industries
    —industries that can just outsource jobs overseas—we need to create industries which will keep
    jobs in this country, and cannot be shipped overseas. Do you really think the Republicans can do
    this? They don’t even know that this is the goal. The old way just doesn’t work any more.
    His administration reformed the rules of the Wall Street financial industries. Many say, “Not
    enough”, and I agree. But at least the Congress got something positive accomplished amidst
    Republican objection. Can you imagine how little would have been accomplished if the
    Republicans had been in charge? Nothing.
    To view a list of 100 of Obama accomplishments in his first year of Presidency, see
    http://simplifythepositive.blogspot.com/2010/03/100-accomplishments-of-president-barack.html .
    A vote for the Republican Party this November means a vote for the 25% far-fight, radical element, which is embraced by the Conservative (Republican) Party. Why, that’s about the same percentage of people in the U.S. who believe the solar system revolves around the Earth—and probably includes much of the same people. Let’s look at what else these people believe—as represented by some of their most vocal representatives—before considering turning our government over to them:
    Not only are Conservatives supporting the Bush tax cuts for the middle class, but only is it
    includes a tax cut for the upper class—who really need it. In January, the Bush tax cuts are set to
    expire. The Democrats support reinstating them for the middle class, but not the upper class. By
    allowing these tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, the Republicans deny the government
    almost a trillion dollars in revenue, based on the assumption that these people will put it back into
    the economy through investment. But who say this will happen? If it doesn’t, this country stands
    to increase the deficit by $700 billion dollars..
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews_excl/20100913/pl_ynews_excl/ynews_excl_pl3604
    What a gamble, based on a theory. I say ‘a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush’–no pun
    intended.
    Some of the most radical members have seemed to suggest ‘gun play’ in the event they don’t win. Others suggest ending social programs, like medicare and social security, because they’re too
    expensive, while profiting from these very programs all these years. Or, that science is creating
    mice with fully developed human brains. And now some anti-abortionists are even suggesting
    citizenship for zygotes. Do we really want persons like this representing the American people?.
    What do conservatives have to offer about improving the economy? All they can talk about is
    complaining about ‘tax and spend’ Democrats—on balance, will they take a page from the
    George Bush play book, and become ‘borrow and spend’ Republicans instead, or just continue to
    talk? Is the new Republican Plan (recently released) and different from what we’ve been doing
    for the past year under Bush?. While the conservatives were in power, during the past 10 years,
    America’s middle class income has been reduced by 5%!
    http://www.menafn.com/qn_news_story.asp?storyid={01647C10-C1BB-11DF
    -BA89-00212804637C}
    Many of the right-wing have exhibited statements suggesting religious, ethnic, and
    gender intolerance—currently directed toward the Muslim and GLBT community. Essentially,
    they simply don’t believe in freedom for all people—to them freedoms are bestowed upon whom
    they prefer to pick and choose. We have seen this in our history with the KKK, and
    anti-Semitism, and prejudice toward many other immigrant groups. And we’ve seen it more
    recently with the emergence of ‘the Birthers’ and a wealth of photos depicting President Obama
    as a witch doctor or pimp—next thing you know they’ll be saying he’s a space alien. Do you
    really want these kind of sentiments having an influence on government?
    Conservatives are constantly calling attention to the high unemployment rate. But they forget
    to remind you that during the Reagan administration, the unemployment rate went to 9.7-9.8%
    and remained there for two years—and that was a mild recession compared to this near
    depression.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-abrams/pop-quiz-under-reagan-wha_b_341348.html
    Changing the economy is not an easy job; and the Republicans don’t have the answer by
    regressing back to the practices of the Bush days.
    And Tea Party candidates are just going to be co-oped into the Republican Party as soon as they’re elected—so don’t think they’re going to be anything special. A vote for them is just a good as a vote for the Republicans. It’s them or us! Apathy is not an option!
    Dismantling or privatizing social security, medicare, and veteran’s health care—as Republicans suggest—how well would that have worked, for example, when the bottom fell out of the stock market a couple of years ago? We’ve all got a stake in this dog and pony show!
    If you agree with what I’ve said here, go out and vote Democratic in November. We’re almost certain to lose some seats in congress because of a traditionally low turnout of progressive voters during mid-term elections. So we need Independent and Democratic voters to turn out and vote for progressive candidates to minimize the number of seats lost to reactionary conservatives. We’re especially vulnerable to losing the House of Representatives, where some important bills originate. Don’t let this happen! And vote Democratic for Governor too—where applicable.

  4. …if I may ignore the “call to arms” spam comment for a moment, I have to say that my youthful years trapped in the thrall of academia-based journalism would probably have led me to write the same sort of editorial 35 years ago. It would have been as wrong then as it is now to do so, because the point of view is essentially negative and a defense of the home turf rather than any sort of actual analysis of the course of events. I probably wouldn’t have been able to see my own defensive attitude about My School; that’s just the way things can work at various points in a person’s life. I can be equally as defensively passionate these days regarding the federal land management agency for which I have toiled for all these years…
    The most charitable thing I can say is that we should allow editorial writers and editors at student-run college newspapers a certain latitude to explore and comment on the world in which they live. At the same time, we should point out when they slip over that “true/not provable” edge and start wallowing around in the sorts of embarrassing logical fallacies that are neither supported by the simple facts or by an understandable but misguided desire to do that whole “Be True To Your School” Beach Boys thing…

  5. paul says:

    What pisses me right off is the glib preaching about ” a boy’s inability to deal with the hardships of life”. You’re an editorial writer for your college newspaper, don’t bloviate about someone else’s hardship not being hard enough to meet your standards. Even the choice of the word “hardship” reeks of privileged assholery.
    Oh, and another thing. Someone old enough to go to college, only a few years younger than the editorial writer(s), old enough to be engaging in sexual acts: not a boy. It’s not quite as insulting as using the term for a middle-aged black man, but it’s working up to it.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: