Bearing Arms

The comments on this story, about the shooting of a 13-year-old boy (because, according to the report, he was carrying a toy gun police mistook for real) are instructive.

Not just because they’re full of racists, though of course they are. They’re also full of people who think the police had no choice but to shoot someone carrying what appeared to be a deadly weapon:

The kid had what seemed to be a deadly weapon, he didn’t drop it when ordered, he may have acted threateningly. it’s not as if the police rocked up, and decided to shot a kid for no reason.

This guy posted this comment over and over in the thread, repeating not only his bad grammar but also his point: That if the cops see you with a weapon, they have the right to shoot you dead.

I thought of all the concealed-carry fights on the state level over the years, of the “bring your gun to Starbucks” assholes, of every weekend wannabe who gets his jollies strapping up to go to the grocery store. They might, in their second-amendment fervor, decline to give their guns up to police. They might resist, assert their rights, or otherwise “act threateningly.”

Are the cops left with no options in their cases, as well?

You can, after all, buy an AK-47 legally, and carry it around if you want. You can carry a pistol if you have a permit for it. You can keep a six-shooter in your kid’s diaper bag in every state in the union if you have the proper license.

That would mean you have a deadly weapon. Can the cops blow your head off if they see you heading toward them with it?

We never seem to talk about the people who are shot by police on the mere presumption they have a gun, when we talk about our American love of firearms. Yet people who jaw on endlessly about the latter will also espouse the right of law enforcement to the former, perhaps because none of us imagine suffering the tragedies of others. Perhaps because we never consider our own behavior suspicious, or think we would act or make choices to avoid every dangerous situation.

Or perhaps the loudest proponents of our uncontrolled gun ownership society simply never see themselves in the faces of the slain.

A.

5 thoughts on “Bearing Arms

  1. montag says:

    When the cops start killing afffluent white kids in the suburbs under the same circumstances, you can bet the policy of shoot on sight will change.
    And if the policy doesn’t change now, you can also bet that, eventually, they’ll be killing affluent white kids in the suburbs.

  2. Maplestreet says:

    Well put.

  3. NTodd says:

    Amen.

  4. Snarki, child of Loki says:

    “Or perhaps the loudest proponents of our uncontrolled gun ownership society simply never see themselves in the faces of the slain.”
    Well, DUH. They’d have to hang out 24/7 in the tanning salon to be able to “see themselves in the faces of the slain”.

  5. Elspeth Ravenwind says:

    (Creepy sidebar ad on the front page: NRA blurb “join the NRA, get a rosewood handled knife!”?!?!!?!? I know that wasn’t FD approved!)

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: