Juggernaut Update: Debate Edition

REUTERS/Wilfredo Lee/Pool

Most everyone who has been following the race between Democratic incumbent Bill Nelson and Republikkkan challenger Katherine Harris agrees that Harris needed a strong showing in last night’s debate in order to chip away at Nelson’s 20 to 30 point lead in the polls.

It didn’t happen.

[A]fter fielding an hour’s worth of questions from journalists and each other, the Republican congresswoman wound up agreeing with the Democratic incumbent about as often as she differed with him.

Withdraw troops from Iraq? Neither favored the idea.

Create a national fund to manage disasters? Nelson said it was his brainchild, and Harris said she fought for it. Both also said military action against North Korea should be “on the table” and that global warming “is a fact.” They both agreed the nation needed to develop more alternative fuels.


Harris complained after the debate that Nelson was given “softball” questions while she was criticized as “polarizing.”

“In all my previous races, we’ve been the underdog and we’ve prevailed,” she said in her closing remarks.

Nelson talked slowly and methodically. He rarely acknowledged Harris and repeatedly called her “Ms. Harris” — overlooking her status as a member of Congress. When she accused him of failing to return tainted money, he responded calmly: “That’s simply not true.”

In contrast, Harris gestured frequently, spoke with emotion and seemed a bit flustered.


Sensing a barrage of attacks was coming, Nelson invoked President John F. Kennedy: “People expect more from us than indignation and attacks.”

But neither really came from Harris. And Nelson held back on attacking her. He left it to the debate panel to mention her unwitting receipt of illegal campaign contributions from a now convicted defense contractor, Mitchell Wade of MZM. She sponsored a failed appropriations request after the contributions were made.

Harris pointed out that she had no way of knowing the contributions were illegal.

“I have also wanted extraordinary transparency. Whenever we have appropriations requests, I’ve published those,” Harris said. “Everyone can see my requests that I’ve asked for. The senator will not show his requests because of the tie-back to those who may have contributed to him.”

But despite the claim, Harris’s office has denied repeated press inquiries for most of her appropriations requests.

Harris’ strongest attack on Nelson came when she said he unwittingly took money from insurance company Riscorp — as did she — but refused to return the tainted contributions. She returned donations from the insurer.

Said Nelson, a former state insurance commissioner: “That’s simply not true, what my opponent has said . . . Talk about Riscorp. Not only did I return all of that [money]. I put the company out of business. I shut ’em down.”


8 thoughts on “Juggernaut Update: Debate Edition

  1. She is a satire, at this point.
    Although with those cankles, I’d suggest “satyr.”

  2. Bill Nelson is vanilla. He’s boring but people know he’ll never generate the kind of ‘excitement’ that Duke Cunningham and Tom DeLay and Katherine Harris bring to government. That’s why after this election he’ll be Senator-for-Life from Florida.
    He ain’t a crook, he ain’t lazy, and he ain’t crazy. That’s better than 90% of Congress.

  3. The next news release from “Pink Sugar” will be an announcement of a new Director of Fashion Image.

  4. it’s not the skirt, it’s the unfortunate choice of hose. too light and makes her cankles look even fatter. but a pants suit would have been better. and how much did her plastic surgery cost?

  5. He ain’t a crook, he ain’t lazy, and he ain’t crazy.
    I LOVE that as a slogan. Of course anything that rhymes in a slogan melts my butter.

    What is it with these women? Ew.

Comments are closed.