OK maybe that’s not scary but what about…

I hadn’t written about the Presidential directive on continuity of power which sounded quite scary because I was not sure there was all that much there, there. TPM takes a look at with this post and found experts that seem to think that is the case…

When a presidential
directive appeared on the White House’s Web site on May 9, seemingly
expanding the president’s powers after a catastrophic attack, readers
began emailing us asking why there had been no uproar in the media or
amongst civil liberties groups.

The consensus amongst experts seems to be that
the directive, aimed at establishing “continuity of government” after a
major disaster, is not new nor does the policy seem to expand executive
power.

What should scare folks and has received little attention except to perhaps those following Katrina news is that Bush already had expanded executive power in case of attacks or disasters with a provision included in the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act that allows him to take control of the military for law enforcement…

Under a provision included in the 2007 National Defense
Authorization Act, the president has greatly expanded authority to take
command of National Guard troops and use active-duty military units for
domestic law enforcement under the Insurrection Act.

Instead of limiting federal control to times of rebellion or to
enforce federal laws over the objections of state officials, the
president now has the authority to take control to restore public order
after a terrorist attack, a national disaster, a disease outbreak or
“other condition.”

That increased and broad authority has drawn criticism from many in
Congress, the governors of all 50 states, the National Conference of
State Legislatures, generals and enlisted members of the National Guard
and the National Sheriffs’ Association, among others. They say guard
commanders and governors know the turf, the needs and the local
officials who call for help and how best to respond.

This ought to scare folks and deserves more attention.
Hopefully Sen Leahy will be successful in his attempt to repeal the provision.

3 thoughts on “OK maybe that’s not scary but what about…

  1. Paul in LA says:

    Josh Marshall is TERRIFIED. The ACLU is TERRIFIED.
    I remember when Marshall was supporting the war, before the invasion.
    He doesn’t seem to be able to believe his eyes, and the ACLU TWIT who said go back to sleep can go back to not mattering.
    To quote another blog comment at TPM, “the experts say there isn’t a problem. Good to know.”
    Grant is Glory? What?

  2. pansypoo says:

    with BUSH FATIGUE getting so high. that WOULD be the last straw and there WOULD be a movement to get georgie OUT.
    no way would he be able to pull it off. shit. they would beg clinton before they would want bush to stay.

  3. Alex Fetcher says:

    Great site!a34df571c4f9af8046fa3877e9682ab0

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: