Courage, Man, The Pain Cannot Be Much

Those of you who were in the Crack Van with us this morning heard it in the original, delivered by a righteously pissed off Chris Dodd, who along with Russ Feingold was about the only person in the Senate fully awake today. But if you missed it, or wanted the full version unsullied by kitten noises, applause, vague sexual innuendo and recipes, why, I’m here to serve:

Mr. President, I oppose the Intelligence bill on these five counts for the same reason I oppose retroactive immunity: because where the president’s power is strongest, the rule of law should be strongest, as well. The Intelligence Committee’s bill means more power—and less law.

It reduces court oversight nearly to the point of symbolism; it could allow the targeting of Americans on false pretences; it opens us up to new, twisted rationales for warrantless wiretapping, the very thing it ought to prevent; it could allow bulk collection, as soon as an administration has the wherewithal to build such an enormous dragnet; and it sets all of these deeply flawed provisions in stone for six years.

In sum, Mr. President, the Intelligence version is entirely too trusting a bill. With its immunity, and with its wiretapping provisions, it has a simple answer to George Bush’s “trust me”: an all-too-eager “yes!”

I leave my colleagues with a simple question: Has that trust been earned?

Despitestories saying the Democrats caved yet again, this thing won’t be entirely done until the final cloture voteMonday afternoon. At which time Dodd will have to pull out his big guns again.

I found it hilarious that Reid and others accused Dodd of “grandstanding” for his presidential campaign when he threatened the filibuster before. Hilarious because most Americans, sadly, couldn’t pick this issue out of a lineup consisting otherwise only of seletions of breakfast pastry. Hilarious because, yeah, if you want to boost your presidential campaign in Iowa, what you do is talk all day in the Senate. Hilarious because, given all that Dodd said in December, like hewasn’t gonna come back and fucking own this in January. He warned Reid then: Bring it back and back I’ll come and bring everybody with me.

There’s a few more days to salvage this thing, to at least convince enough people to make a stand. To convince Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton that they need to get into town on Monday, walk into the Senate chamber, clap Chris Dodd on the shoulder and say, “Good job, man, and we’re here with you.” I know it’s a pipe dream, but what are we doing here, if not to call for the courage we dream of, so that it becomes reality?Ask them to stand up. You shouldn’t have to, and they might not, but ask them anyway. Ask them to lead. Ask them to stand. Ask them to have the courage of not just their convictions but their constituents.

A.

8 thoughts on “Courage, Man, The Pain Cannot Be Much

  1. ashley says:

    John Edwards joined the call for a filibuster today.
    Obama plugged his “top 10 list” appearance on Letterman, and HRC plugged her appearance on “Tyra”.
    Guess who I’m voting for.

  2. S2 says:

    I’m sorry I had to leave the van before that happened. But I did get to change some diapers, so I guess it balances out. Hope the story has a happy ending; I’m off to Davos (I mean to change more diapers).

  3. spocko says:

    s2, that cracked me up. A bit of blog promotion here (I don’t like using that other word). It’s about what I suggested for questions for telecom analysts regarding telco immunity.
    Spocko’s Brain questions for financial analysts on telco retroactive immunity.

  4. MapleStreet says:

    Hint to candidates for president : Dodd got a whole lot of good press when he stood up against the problems of FISA. He certainly went up in my book.
    I, at present, am not sure which of the top 3 demo candidates I would vote for in the Missouri primary.
    Hint. Hint. Hint.

  5. Mario in OK says:

    As Ashley stated, look who has stood up already.
    That’s one of the reasons John Edwards has my vote on February 5th.

  6. Cigarettes says:

    OSTON (Reuters) – Eight states sued the maker of Camel cigarettes on
    Tuesday, charging that a promotion in an issue of Rolling Stone magazine
    violates a 1998 agreement not to use cartoons in its marketing efforts.
    The suits focus on ads for the Camel brand, produced by R.J. Reynolds
    Tobacco Co., which appeared in a nine-page foldout section in the
    November 15 issue of the music and popular culture magazine. The
    section, titled “Indie Rock Universe,” is designed to look like doodling
    in a student’s spiral-bound notebook, with drawings of planets made to
    look like animals and characters. It features Camel’s name and logo.
    Pls, observe the Copyright.
    Camel Cigarettes,
    discount Camel Cigarettes,
    Camel cigarettes online,
    Camel Cigs

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: