Today on Tommy T’s Obsession With The Freeperati – when Freepers attack

Good morning, campers!
Let’s get the HAZMAT suits on and crack the airlock door, shall we?
Back issues are over and now you’re stuck with me for a long one, so bring an extra air bottle.

What do we have here in the first drum of toxic Freeper sludge?
Why, it’s Olympia Snowe admitting what Freepers brag about constantly – except when she says it, it’s a horrible thing!

Snowe: My Party Has Changed

AsMaineGoes.com ^

| February 15, 2009
| Scott Fish

Posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:12:51 AM bybogeybob
The Senior Senator from Maine.


In an interview with CBS News, Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins
defended their votes in support of the Obama stimulus package. Sen.
Snowe said, “I haven’t changed. I have felt that my party has changed.”

SENATOR OLYMPIA SNOWE (R-ME): I guess it’s sort of like being a
skunk at the, you know, lawn party – lawn party, you know, – and so, I
said I think that’s, you know, what happens

DOZIER: She says her party is missing the point that Americans want
Republicans to be part of the process, even if it means compromise.

SNOWE: I think I reflect my roots, you know, the original principles
of the Republican party. I haven’t changed. I have felt that my party
has changed.


div class=”EC_b2″> Sad that so many Republicans in Maine support her,
election cycle after election cycle. Nothing but a socialist, who wraps
herself in GOP clothing. A classic two-timer.

1
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:12:51 AM
bybogeybob

To: bogeybob
She’s right: the Democrat Partyhas
changed. Enough, in fact that she can now stop pretending she’s a
Republican. Just change sides already, Olympia, and all the “beautiful
people” who have destroyed Maine’s quality of life will be sure to love
you.
4
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:17:16 AM
byandy58-in-nh
(Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)

And now, “rovenstinez” channels Biff from Back To The Future, conveniently forgetting that Biff was a knuckleheaded drooler:

To: bogeybob
HELLO, Senator Snowe…Knock..knock, is anybody home inside that head of yours?

6
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:18:41 AM
byrovenstinez
To: bogeybob
Therepubic party has changed… it has become just
like snowe. collins and specter. That is why we are now the failed
minority party. LLS

9
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:19:24 AM
byLibLieSlayer
(hussein will NEVER be my president… NEVER!)

The “repubic” party? I guess he was trying to slur the Repubs by dropping the “ic” a la “Democrat party”.

That, or he was making a Vitter reference.

To: Constitutional Patriot
She has to go — does anyone ever challenge her for office? This would be a great opportunity.
We will see what happens when she is up in 2012. It seems to me that
folks have a short memory…yes even all of us FREEPERS. I thought for
sure Lindsey would be challenged this year from all the crap he has
done in his past, but alas we are stuck with him now until 2014 after
easily being reelected this year.Another up in 2010 is that Vitter
from Louisiana who embarassed the Republican Party two years ago with
calls to hookers but it seems like he will win again
because people are
changing their minds about him again. It is a wonder why these folks
stay for life times. Why not…screw up when you are reelected for a
few years but the last two ensure you do the right thing and people
will quickly reelect you. It is a non stop cycle.

37
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:35:35 AM
bynapscoordinator

To: napscoordinator
Good lord, now you wanna throw Vitter overboard?

41
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:39:39 AM
byCedric

Only if he’s running on the Repubic ticket.

To: Cedric
Good lord, now you wanna throw Vitter overboard?
Didn’t he do it to himself? I didn’t make phone calls to hookers, he did? Why get mad at me. He is the one without morals.

43
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:41:48 AM
bynapscoordinator

To: bogeybob
No, the Republican Party didn’t change. Some folks tried to make it Democrat-Lite.That’s why the Party can’t win elections.

26
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 7:29:52 AM
bypopdonnelly
(I went to an Obama Townhall and threw away my crutches!)

Except, of course, that Snowe – um – keeps winning elections. Other than that, your logic is flawless.

Much more, including a drive-by Freeping gone horribly wrong (and a hilariously impotent attack on yours truly) after the (Michael Steele approved) “Jump, jump, to the J – O – ump!”


Well, what have we here?
One step closer to the “New World Order (patent applied for)”?

Obama May Place U.S. Under International Criminal Court

humanevents.com ^

| 02/10/2009
| Thomas P. Kilgannon

Posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 12:49:57 PM byshielagolden
Obama May Place U.S. Under International Criminal Court
Waterboarding.
Abu Ghraib. Detaining terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. Dissing Hans Blix.
These, as seen by the Left, are the cardinal sins of George W. Bush’s
administration. Set aside the fraternity party-like nonsense that took
place at Abu Ghraib and what’s left are actions taken to protect U.S.
interests.
But self-loathing Americans whose minds are confined
in the cult of globalism don’t see it that way. Each of these
“offenses” has at least one thing in common: they hurt the feelings of
foreigners. Insensitivity to the outside world, U.S. internationalists
argue, is a stain on Uncle Sam’s reputation from which we must repent.
With
that in mind, one more “offense” must be included in the list of Bush’s
sins. It occurred May 6, 2002, when John Bolton, on orders from the
President, withdrew the U.S. from the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court (ICC). Oh, there were terrible tantrums in Turtle Bay
that day! Globalists were dismayed because Mr. Bush’s rejection of the
ICC was a vote for American sovereignty — a refusal to cede authority
to international government and a court that is not bound to the
principles of the U.S. Constitution, far less our laws.
That could change under the Obama administration.
Two
weeks ago, hope returned to the House of Hammarskjold when U.S.
Ambassador Susan Rice, in a closed Security Council meeting, voiced
support for the ICC. She said it “looks to become an important and
credible instrument for trying to hold accountable the senior
leadership responsible for atrocities committed in the Congo, Uganda
and Darfur.”
The mere mention of the International Criminal
Court by the U.S. Permanent Representative drew her colleagues’
attention. “What she said on human rights and international law I could
have written myself,” French ambassador Jean-Maurice Ripert told
Bloomberg News. Costa Rica’s Jorge Urbina said Rice’s speech “raises
expectations” that the United States will submit to the authority of
the ICC.

What? You mean Administration officials might be held liable for crimes by a world court that has no authority to do anything other than condemn and point fingers?
Horrors!!

To: shielagolden
Triple investments in lead.

2
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 12:51:37 PM
byunkus

Oh, go fuck yourself, Rambo. You’ll only need one shell, so don’t spend your entire stimulus check at Cheaper Than Dirt.

To: shielagolden
If he does, then he deserves a civil war in return.

5
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 12:52:28 PM
byreagan_fanatic
(Dissent Is Patriotic!)

To: shielagolden
Lincoln’s election tore this country apart.Obama wants to be just like Lincoln.

6
posted onMonday, February 16, 2009 12:53:20 PM
byClearCase_guy
(Obama must be the Antichrist. No one else would work so hard to destroy the US.)

Now bear in mind this is coming from people who fetishize the GOP as “The party of Lincoln”.
Except, of course, when it concerns stuff like black people being allowed to vote, or trying to get into the country clubs. Then they’re the party of Lynn Westmoreland.

Next – Brutal chimps react to article about a brutal chimp:

Brutal Chimp Attack Sends Woman To Hospital

Theindychannel.com ^

| February 17, 2009

Posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 6:53:23 AM byAbathar
Witness Says Chimp Bit Woman’s Hands Off STAMFORD, Conn. — Police
said a 15-year-old chimpanzee kept as a pet mauled a woman visiting the
owner and left her with serious, “life-changing” injuries.
They
told TV station WFSB the 200-pound chimp, named Travis, had been
rambunctious all day and expressed to its owner, 70-year-old Sandra
Herold, that it wanted to take a ride in the car.
Police said
the chimp grabbed the keys and let himself out of the house. Herold
tried to calm the chimp down by giving him tea laced with Xanax, but it
didn’t seem to work, police said. Herold then called her 55-year-old
friend, Charla Nash, to help.
Stamford police said when Nash
pulled up to the house, the chimp ran over and mauled her. Officials
called the attack “lengthy and vicious.”

Wow – ugly stuff, and you’d think, not a subject for levity – right?
Wrong.

To: Abathar
There’s an obvious solution: Background checks
prior to every chimp purchase, limit chimp purchases to one per month,
license every chimp with strict requirements on chimp owners. $200
excise tax on the purchase of full auto chimps, registration and
taxation of all bananas and banana-growing supplies, no open carry of
chimps, strict licensing for concealed carry of chimps, no chimps
within 1000 ft of a school, church, daycare center, government building
or parade.
Did I miss anything?

11
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 7:10:36 AM
byCholeraJoe
(Always pack the heat. Always pack the heat. Always pack the heat.)

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
>> Just imagine packs of 200 pound chimps roaming your city’s streets!

I don’t suppose the obvious New Orleans / Katrina jokes would be in good taste here, would they?

23
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 7:29:05 AM
byNervous Tick
(Party? I don’t have one anymore.)

To: MarkL
Another Muslim marriage gone bad…

22
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 7:26:41 AM
bySir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)

What a funny bunch! Those crazy cut-ups!

Next up – those guys who used to decry out-of-wedlock pregnancies as the moral shortcomings of welfare moms and trailer-trash sluts whose moms didn’t raise them right, in –Bristol Palin and the new “Freeper morality standards”

Sarah Palin’s daughter, Bristol Palin, says abstinence is unrealistic in interview on Fox News

New York Dail News.com ^

| 02/17/09
| News Staff

Posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 8:01:41 AM byBig_Monkey
Teen pregnancy? Not really a good idea.
Stopping teen sex? Ain’t gonna happen.
So
says Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s 18-year-old daughter, Bristol, who told
Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren Monday night that the abstinence her mom
preaches is “not realistic at all.”
Bristol Palin’s pregnancy,
revealed shortly after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) chose Sarah Palin to
be his running mate, shook up the last presidential campaign.
Bristol
Palin, who gave birth in late December, described the rigors of being a
teen mom, and while she wouldn’t go into detail why it isn’t realistic
for guys and gals her age not to have sex, she did say it isn’t smart
to get knocked up.
“Everyone should wait 10 years,” Palin said. “I hope people learn from my story.
“It’s so much easier if you’re married, have a house and career. It’s not a situation you want to strive for.”
She denied that her mother’s anti-abortion views were the reason she went ahead with the pregnancy.
“It was my choice to have the baby,” she said. “It doesn’t matter what my mom’s views are on it. It was my decision.”
But telling her mom that she and her hockey hunk boyfriend, Levi Johnston, were to be parents was tough, she admitted.
“Harder than labor,” she said.

To: Big_Monkey
Democrats will be quick to take abstinence advice from an unwed teen mother.

8
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 8:10:42 AM
byAppyPappy
(If you aren’t part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)

To: Big_Monkey
Sarah needs to give Bristol the Don Corleone
talk, ” I have a sentimental weakness for my children and I spoil them
as you can see. They talk when they should listen.”
“Never tell anyone outside of the family what you’re thinking again.”

9
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 8:11:01 AM
bydfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 – Good Things Come in Threes)

Ooh -Sarah Palin as theGodmother – she’s gonna make ’em an offer they can’t understand.
Looks like young Levi got to her first with“Say hello to my leetle fren’ !”

To: Raycpa
Hollywood’s morals are raising our young people.

10
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 8:11:39 AM
bydel4hope
(Signed up in 2005 with real Hope. Things aren’t hopeless now, but looking grim for taxpayers)

And all that time I thought she grew up in Wasilla…

To: ignorancerunsrampant
You can always beat and lock up your kid when you think they had sex…it works for a lifetime!

49
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 8:54:38 AM
byFawn
(http://www.stimuluswatch.org/)

I think Fawn’s kidding here.
I think.

What’s this creeping up behind us? Why, it’sZombie mirth certificate!‏

Apparently, It Is Dumb To Ask For Physical Proof Regarding Obama

Stop the ACLU ^

| 2/16/09
| staff

Posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 1:38:39 PM bypissant
After eight years of the Left accusing Bush of everything that they
don’t blame on anthropogenic global warming, and sometimes they blame
both, with little to no proof, lefties, still riding high on
hopeNchange, and probably the fumes from their black velvet Obama
paintings, just do not like it when anyone asks for simple proof of
Obama’s citizenship. Witness barking moonbat, and member of The
Tennessean, Gail Kerr take on the subject of Barry’s birth certificate
(and, hopefully, Jenny Craig):
****
In the Handy Guide
for Newspaper Opinion Columnists, this is called shooting fish in a
barrel. Or hitting a slow-pitched softball.
Four Tennessee
state representatives, all Republicans, have signed up to be plaintiffs
in a lawsuit against President Barack Obama, aimed at forcing him to
prove he is a United States citizen by coughing up his birth
certificate.
Let me just say what all the world is now
thinking, including their fellow Republicans on the Hill: This is
dumber than a box of rocks.

We are going to pry the BC from his cold, marxist fingers…
1
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 1:38:39 PM
bypissant

To: pissant
Obama hires lawyers to hide is birth certificate, Occidental records, etc. because “there’s nothing to hide”.
At least there’s what some folks want us to believe …

4
posted onTuesday, February 17, 2009 1:41:26 PM
byF15Eagle
(1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, John 11:25, 14:6, 1 Tim 2:5, John 3:17-18, John 20:31, 1 John 5:13, John 6:69)

You know, there’s a fine line between steadfastness and self-delusion…these guys skated over it sometime in November of last year.

Next – Me predicts!

Prediction: Obama will use military force to dissolve State Capitals that oppose his plans

Me
| 02-18-09
| Vanity

Posted onWednesday, February 18, 2009 12:12:23 PM byprismsinc
I’m running this outcome in my head.Based on what Rush has
confirmed for me
, that Obama wants to punish achievers, combined with
his rampant silent signing of executive orders, and other conclusions
I’ve come to, this seems inevitable to me.
Many States seem to
be preparing to oppose the Stimulus. The outcome here can only go this
way, especially if Obama is as bitter as Rush claims.
Thoughts everyone?

You’re a looney.

div class=”EC_a2″ style=”margin-left: 40px;”>To: prismsinc