Today on Earljam’s Obsession with the Freeperati – No True Conservative edition

Good morning, you commies, and G*d Bless America!

Well, now that I’ve been outed by the Palin-worshippers, there’s no damn reason for me to pretend any longer.

My name’s Earljam, and your homosexualist-worshipping asses are mine.

Let’s look at some Earl pearls of True Conservative wisdom, ya wanna?

First – when yer boat gets full, it just needs a little Palin’ out!

Sarah Palin and the End of an Era: Split from FNC highlights fade of Tea Party as well as her own

The National Journal ^

| January 27, 2013
| Jill Lawrence

Posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 1:43:03 AM by 2ndDivisionVet

The news that Sarah Palin will no longer be a paid contributor to Fox
News puts an exclamation point on the end of an era, or at least a
chapter, in U.S. political history. She could land somewhere else, and
she still has her Facebook friends, but it’s hard to imagine she’ll find
a more visible or influential platform than Fox.

The former
Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential nominee has been fading from
the scene for some time, as she inadvertently highlighted when she
complained on Facebook during the Republican convention in August that
the network had canceled her scheduled interviews that night. Her
brother, Chuck Heath Jr., told Alan Colmes last week on Fox Radio that
his sister is “kind of laying low right now,” though he wouldn’t or
couldn’t say when asked why.

Once the face of an energetic and
politically potent Tea Party movement, Palin is leaving Fox at a time
when polls show the Tea Party at an all-time low in both membership and
favorability. Her departure also coincides with calls by some leading
Republicans for their party to stop saying things that erode the GOP
brand and turn off voters in droves.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal
said bluntly this week at a Republican National Committee meeting in
Charlotte that the GOP needs to stop being “the stupid party,” and
former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour said he agreed. The two were
talking in particular about losing Senate candidates Todd Akin of
Missouri and Richard Mourdock of Indiana, both of whom made inflammatory
(and in Akin’s case, flagrantly ignorant) comments about rape.

But
Palin, with her flamboyant rhetoric, has stoked her own
disproportionate share of controversies. This is the woman who, after
all, coined the term “death panels” to describe discussions between
patients and physicians…

********************

How many times are they going to write her obituary?
1
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 1:43:16 AM
by 2ndDivisionVet
As many times as it takes, quim-chaser.
My man McCain should have arranged an interview for her with the bottom of Lake Superior.

To: freekitty

Sarah Palin should have her own TV channel.

4
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 1:57:24 AM
by Berlin_Freeper
(Molon Labe)
She does, ya pussified shoe-sniffer – it’s called the Home Shopping Network.

To: Berlin_Freeper

She already has a spiffy studio in her home in Wasilla.

5
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 2:00:26 AM
by 2ndDivisionVet
(I’ll raise $2million for Sarah Palin’s presidential run. What’ll you do?)
If by “Spiffy” you mean she hasn’t started shitting in the corners yet, yeah. Let her fester there until she explodes.

To: Cowboy Bob
This might explain the author…


Ummm. Meet jill.

13
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 2:50:33 AM
by MestaMachine
(Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
Bullshit. If you put some fuck-me pumps and librarian glasses on her, and squash her nose flat, you’d do her in a minute. Now get back on your knees in front of old Balin’ Palin and do what you were hired to do.

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Shhhhhhhhhhhhh …

She’s re-loadin’

18
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 3:17:52 AM
by knarf
(I say things that are true … I have no proof … but they’re true)
That’s because she can’t hit shit. That stupid piece of meat thinks she’s Annie Oakley, but she’s really William S. Burroughs.

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This was arranged by the GOPe comprising Rove, Romney, Powell
and the other Soros-Obama plants.

33
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 6:37:03 AM
by Diogenesis
(Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
Hey –screw you! My man Karl Rove handed the Presidency over to us not once, but twice! The only thing that dim-witted skirt ever handled was when she was handled her ass by Katie Couric.
Katie Kouric, fer Chr*st’s sake!! It’s like getting checkmated in three by a six-year-old.
RoveBastard
.
Aren’t there any real men out there willing to take that braying simpleton slut down a notch?

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, the ugly truth is that Palin lost a tremendous amount of
political momentum and much of her grassroots infrastructure (best seen
in such sites as Organize4Palin and Conservatives4Palin) when she told
Mark Levin that she was not running for President. Those groups and
others are still around, but much of their energy and membership has
simply dissipated over the past year.Moreover, PalinTV (which was a
strong effort to bypass the MSM and to get Palin’s unedited words
directly out to the public) no longer has its own web presence but is
now just a Youtube channel.
That’s because she’s as astute as a guy setting himself on fire and as informative as a talking bird.
Her next stop is pay-per-view slots on YouPorn.

I’m not sure that she will ever be able to
recover what she has lost by her decision, unless she runs for and wins
Begich’s seat in 2014, which would revitalize her political standing and
give her a springboard for 2016.
Yeah – watch the stupid trollop do a one-and-a-half gainer into an empty pool.

As far as the TEA party movement
goes, it is in fact in some disarray now, mostly at the hands of the
corrupt, crooked, GOP-E, which fought it harder than the Rats. Since
Palin chose not to run, it did not have any real leaders to coalesce
around, and was successfully infiltrated by GOP-E hacks and operatives,
who then tried to direct its energy to Team Romney. I remember some of
FR’s resident chest beaters claiming two years ago that the TEA party
was self-sustaining and did not need any leaders. Well, that has proven
to be wrong-headed
, and so here we are, stuck with Obama for four more
years (or more), and a fetid, feckless GOP-E now doing his bidding in
Congress.

34
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 6:42:23 AM
by Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
And if that snow-bunny shithead hadn’t derailed Senator McCain’s McCain Train, we’d now have the Presidency, both houses, and the other four-ninths of the Supreme Court, or my name’s not Earljam.
But no – you had to mistake tits for brains, shit-for-brains. Lie down and let the empty-headed bitch walk all over you, why dontcha?

To: MestaMachine
No, I don’t think that it’s dead, but dwindling. How many people on
FR have been complaining lately about how their local TEA party groups
have pretty much fallen apart despite their best efforts (including
mine)? Where are the rallies with the Gadsden flags?
Why was Romney the
Republican nominee, and why is Obama still the president.

Going into denial is a surefire strategy for continued defeat.

49
posted on Monday, January 28, 2013 8:38:40 AM
by Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
Screw you, buddy. While you were parading around in front of TV cameras with tea bags dangling from your hats like some kind of faggot dancing on a Mardi Gras float, the commies were registering people to vote.
But you?
You were too busy fapping off to pics of the stupid strumpet to do anything useful.
More after the – HEY!What the hell???? Let go of me!


I truly apologise, gentle people. No, I’m not really Earljam – he just read Kibizer’s comment from last week’s Obsession, and thought he’d sneak in here and get some revenge for getting kicked out of Freeperville.

Elspeth and Southern Beale took him down (embarrassing for him, innit?) and kicked him out.
I have derived a suitable punishment for him, though.
I made a $20 donation in his name to SarahPac. That should keep him busy for a while.
OK – what’s next?
Ah –are there no mooslime panels?

iv>

Why Has CPAC Banned All Panels About Islam?

Politichicks ^
| March 12, 2013
| Ann-Marie Murrell

Posted on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:22:27 PM by

For anyone going to the upcoming Conservative Political Action
Conference (CPAC), I’m sure by now you’re aware that there will be no
panels conducted regarding the threat of Islam this year.Allof our leading experts on IslamRobert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Frank Gaffney and others–have been banned from speaking and/or holding panels.

Unfortunately,
many Conservatives still aren’t aware that two of the most influential
organizers of CPAC—seemingly innocuous tax guru Grover Norquist and
former aide in the Bush administration Suhail Khan—are
fighting together to eliminate any dissenting voices about the
influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. Why is this?

Last
year, I personally learned firsthand that no one—not even a simple
blogger like me—is allowed to even question the threat of Islam in
America at CPAC. In a very small panel moderated by Suhail Khan, I
asked him about his previous year’s statement at CPAC, in which he told
the press, “There is no Muslim Brotherhood in America.” I reminded
Khan that the Muslim Brotherhood via CAIR has said, “Yes, we are here in America”, along with four federal U.S. judges
who also declared the same. So when I asked Khan if he wanted to
retract his very dangerous statement–which I believe is the same as
telling someone there aren’t any snakes in a room full of snakes—without
answering my question, I was asked to leave the conference room and I
was ridiculed by Khan and his followers.

For the record, educating
Americans about Islam and Sharia has nothing to do with being
“anti-Muslim” or any type of bigotry, as both Khan and Norquist have
accused their opposers as being. This is about public awareness and
understanding who our enemy really is–and burying our heads in the sand
about the very real influence of Islam in America will not protect us
from those ‘thousand paper cuts from within’.

This week my
PolitiChick co-anchor Morgan Brittany and I will be reporting from CPAC
and we will not allow this blacklisting of our foremost American experts
on Islam to go unnoticed. For all bloggers and videographers who are
attending, I hope you’ll join us in asking our Conservative leaders the
following questions over and over:

  1. Why, in your opinion, aren’t there any panels on the threat of
    Islam this year? In light of the takeover of the Middle East by the
    Muslim Brotherhood, not to mention 9/11/01 and 9/11/12 isn’t it one of
    the most important topics we can discuss at a Conservative convention?
  2. Why
    are our leading American experts on Islam—including Robert Spencer,
    Pamela Geller and Frank Gaffney–banned from speaking this year?
  3. Rep.
    Michele Bachmann, Rep. Louis Gohmert (TX), Trent Franks (AZ), Lynn
    Westmoreland (GA) and Thomas Rooney (FLA) conducted an investigation
    into the Muslim Brotherhood penetration of the Washington policy-making
    chain. Without looking into the facts presented, the investigation was silenced by both the Left and the Right. Why?
  4. If we’re not allowed to discuss the threat of Islam and creeping Sharia at a Conservative convention, what chance do we have to fight it?

Below is the PolitiChicks episode regarding my confrontation with
Khan at CPAC last year, followed by a transcript of the exchange (with
apologies for the audio):

A-M: Last year you said there is no Muslim Brotherhood in
the United States but the Muslim Brotherhood themselves have said that
29 Muslim-American organizations are–they describe them as being ‘our
organizations and the organizations of our friends. These include the
Islamic Society of North America; the Council on American Islamic
Relations; the North American Islamic Trust and four federal judges have
confirmed that these organizations are friends of the Muslim
Brotherhood. So do you stand by your statement that there is no Muslim
Brotherhood in America?

Suhail: Ma’am what this panel is about is conservative inclusion…

A-M: Should they [the Muslim Brotherhood] be included in conservative politics?

Woman on front row: That’s not what this is about!

Suhail:
That’s not what this panel’s about so if you want to take up those
questions with other people you can. We’re here to talk about
conservative message Americans so if your group, and other Alinsky-like
factions—I can see where you come from.

Woman on front row: Please leave!

1
posted on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:22:28 PM
by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
.
.
To: ZULU

> Musilms own the GOP as well as the Dems.

There’s no doubt about it.

7
posted on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:37:06 PM
by Jyotishi
(Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Islamic infiltrations of our political system for $300, Alex.

10
posted on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:39:48 PM
by PhiloBedo
(You gotta roll with the punches and get with what’s real.)
.
To: ZULU

Yes.

A Freeper (don’t know who) sometimes posts a picture of a Crusading
knight in full chain mail-—a Knight Templar, I think. I love that
particular graphic. They knew how to deal with the Muslim problem.

11
posted on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:40:48 PM
by CatherineofAragon
(Support Christian white males—the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization)
(Tommy) Yeah – because that Crusades thing worked out SO well for them.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is an important story.

The main national conservative conference has been infiltrated and taken over.

I hope conservatives can abandon CPAC and start a new one

14
posted on
by Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
Yeah -you need to Tea Party the Tea Party. Eventually It’ll be down to you and your dog.
.
Look folks – Typepad has eaten the Blockquote function, so I’ll have to stop here.
More next Monday.
Tagged , , , , , ,

6 thoughts on “Today on Earljam’s Obsession with the Freeperati – No True Conservative edition

  1. Athenae says:

    The way the Freepi talk about us never fails to crack me up. We’re pro “militant homosexual.” As opposed to all the unarmed homosexuals? I need a nap.
    A.
    ps. Outside of Heartbreak Ridge, I didn’t know anyone said “quim” anymore. Adorbs.

  2. thebewilderness says:

    Not funny!

  3. WolfeTone says:

    Am I the only one who noticed that PhiloBedo’s tagline is a Van Halen lyric? Should I be embarrassed to have realized that, or should I be more embarrassed for a guy who considers a line from Jump to be poignant and pithy enough to serve as his motto?

  4. Tommy T says:

    Like I said – putting him on SarahPac’s mailing list is suitable punishment.
    Tommy

  5. Razor Eddie says:

    I don’t know… I kinda liked the cut of Earl’s jib.

  6. David Terrenoire says:

    That Earljam is an asshole. I’m glad you gave him the hook, Tommy.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: