Just when you thought that weenies couldn’t be filled with anything more disgusting…
Scratch a Freeper – find an apparatchik.
“Throw another Russian on the fire, boys.”
Coming Out Could Mean Jail Time in Russia
TakePart ^ | OCT 26, 2015 | Rebecca McCrayPosted on 10/26/2015 8:58:49 PM by MinorityRepublican
Conservative lawmakers in Russia are considering amending an already controversial two-year-old article that punishes individuals who “propagate homosexuality” to children. The amendment to this article would make publicly coming out as gay an administrative violation punishable by up to 15 days in jail or a fine of 5,000 rubles, which amounts to about $80.
1 posted on 10/26/2015 8:58:49 PM by MinorityRepublican
Now bear in mind that Freepers hate Russia because it’s full of commies and totalitarian bad guys. I don’t mean hate as in “I hate it when my toast is cold”, I mean hate as in: “I hate you and hope you die horribly!”
To: MinorityRepublicanThis is wrong.
They should be treated for the mental disease they have.
2 posted on 10/26/2015 9:01:47 PM by freedumb2003 (Don’t mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
To: MinorityRepublicanGood for Russia.
Ja DA, tovarisch!
Those with nasty habits will not be marketing the vile behavior to others other than their perversion partner. What they keep private won’t get them in trouble.
8 posted on 10/26/2015 9:27:24 PM by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light….. Isaiah 5:20)
To: freedumb2003I think I’ll pop some popcorn, grab a beer, throw another fagot on the fire, and watch this thread.
11 posted on 10/26/2015 10:00:24 PM by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
To: AllSeems like every week lately, Russia is a better run country than our dear Republic. It’s nice to see a government treat homosexuality as the mental illness it is.
24 posted on 10/27/2015 2:44:57 AM by nightowl_jg
To: freedumb2003It’s just good to see someone in this whole wide world with some moral integrity.26 posted on 10/27/2015 7:08:21 AM by redfreedom (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
Some old stuff now:
Remember this?
Before the Trump rump boys took over Freeperville?
Trump: I’m ‘Totally Pledging’ My Allegiance To The Republican Party
npr ^ | 9-3-2015 | JESSICA TAYLORPosted on 9/3/2015 2:32:24 PM by Citizen Zed
Donald Trump is “totally pledging” his allegiance to the GOP and promising not to mount a potentially damaging third-party bid for president.
The billionaire businessman said Thursday he had signed the Republican National Committee’s “Loyalty Pledge,” which says he will support the eventual nominee and not run as an independent or on another party line.
“I will be totally pledging my allegiance to the Republican Party and the conservative principles for which it stands,” said Trump.
Trump made his announcement at the Trump Towers lobby in New York City after meeting with RNC Chairman Reince Priebus. While many had expected Trump would sign the pledge, one GOP source stressed this morning that, “With Trump, nothing is certain until it’s final.”
Trump was the only GOP presidential candidate not to raise his hand at last month’s debate to pledge he wouldn’t run as a third-party candidate.
1 posted on 9/3/2015 2:32:24 PM by Citizen Zed
Here we go!
To: Citizen Zed
- Donald Trump Praises Canada’s Socialist Health Care System
- Trump Criticized GOP for Being ‘Mean-Spirited’ on Immigration
- Trump On Obama In 2009: “I Think He’s Doing A Really Good Job…He’s Totally A Champion”
- Donald Trump’s Surprisingly Progressive Past
- Trump’s Use of Eminent Domain to Take What He Wants
- Conservative? Donald Trump supported auto bailouts in 2008
To: Citizen Zed
To: z taxmanIf Donald Trump is the Republican favorite, a 3rd Party Candidate is the only option…
5 posted on 9/3/2015 2:37:00 PM by rovenstinez
The Darnold’s supporters haz a sad:
To: z taxman; GeronL
To: donna“You guys make FR negative and boring.”
I’m getting really tired of it.
12 posted on 9/3/2015 2:41:25 PM by Carthego delenda est
To: donna; z taxman; GeronL
To: Carthego delenda est“You guys make FR negative and boring.”
I’m getting really tired of it.Good Lord you trumpoids and your messianic zeal make the obamabots look less worshipful of their flawless god.
Perhaps if Trump wins he will pass a law making it illegal to criticize him. I’m sure the trumpoids will celebrate its passage, while the rest of us have no choice but to remain respectfully silent.
To: GeronL
To: PoloSec
To: z taxmanI am not familiar with this candidate Principles.
I’ve never heard of him either. Is his first name “Nonexistent”?
Again, it appears you have no answer to the crisis our nation is in but thanks anyway. Please let me know when you have this ideal candidate that will be elected.
In the meantime, Trump is saying what I want to hear about illegal immigration. He is saying what I wnat to hear about trade. He is saying what I want to hear about planned Parenthood. He is saying what I want to hear about the economy.
46 posted on 9/3/2015 3:12:32 PM by boycott (S)
To: boycott
Trump blasts Hugh Hewitt as ‘a third-rate radio announcer’
The Hill ^ | 09/04/2015 | Mark Hensch
Posted on 9/4/2015 9:30:55 AM by GIdget2004Donald Trump is blasting Hugh Hewitt after stumbling over foreign policy questions in an interview with the conservative radio host.
“[He is] a third rate radio announcer,” Trump told hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” on Friday morning.
Trump clashed with the radio host on Thursday evening’s “The Hugh Hewitt Show.” Hewitt began asking him what he called “commander-in-chief” questions about international affairs. The exchange became heated when Trump mistook a question about Iran’s Quds Force as a query about the Kurds.
On Friday, Trump said that the broadcaster’s show is beneath him despite his multiple appearances with Hewitt since launching his 2016 campaign in June. Trump said Hewitt was trying to embarrass him by asking about obscure topics.
“Every question was, ‘do you know this one or know that one?’” Trump said.
**********
So I guess he’s not even waiting for the debate to have a public feud with the next moderator…
To: GIdget2004Well, the classy Trump didn’t say Hewitt was bleeding. Let’s face it. Nobody can say anything to or about Trump unless it’s praise. Only a loser, a stupid person, or a third rate person would expect the braggart Trump to know something.
9 posted on 9/4/2015 9:35:00 AM by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: GIdget2004This is Trump’s M.O.
Attack ANYONE who disagrees with him or asks him a tough question…doesn’t matter if its Hugh Hewitt or Megyn Kelly.
DT only expects softball questions from the media.
He wants to be surrounded by a cult of personality, adoring fans, and a servile media.
He is a total egomaniac, narcissistic, petty, and thin skinned.
13 posted on 9/4/2015 9:37:15 AM by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
To: VanDeKoikHewitt is an elitist attorney policy wonk.We’re not interested in electing a policy wonk for President.
I don’t think you have to worry about The Darnold getting all bogged down in details. If he wins, he intends to just wing it.
I mean – how hard can it be?
We want/need a leader.
Hugh sh!t himself yesterday.
17 posted on 9/4/2015 9:39:28 AM by x1stcav (Leftism is like rust: It corrodes 24 hours a day until eradicated.)
To: GIdget2004I follow a lot of this crap semi-closely. Like Obama and Hanoi Boi Johnny, today is the first time I’ve ever heard of the Quds. Hewitt is an @$$.
23 posted on 9/4/2015 9:42:49 AM by FlingWingFlyer (Cecil the Lion says, Stop the Slaughter of the Baby Humans!!!)
To: LSThe Quds force has been around since 1980. It’s become very active and emboldened since Obama became President and has killed many Americans. Trump is going to need to know who is killing Americans if he’s going to be half as great as he says he’s going to be. He should have some knowledge unless he’s going to delegate that to others.
26 posted on 9/4/2015 9:44:06 AM by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: GIdget2004
To: Trapped Behind Enemy LinesHe is a total egomaniac, narcissistic, petty, and thin skinned.
Yup.Don’t forget, much like the current occupant of the White House, Trump supporters will excuse, forgive or overlook anything he does – no matter how childish, boneheaded or ignorant.
Pretty sure Trump has been surrounded with “yes men” for so long he simply doesn’t know how to handle anyone challenging him. The one thing we know, the Trumpsters never will either.
To: j.argeseCan’t stand Hewitt. And he’s so weird-looking!
49 posted on 9/4/2015 9:55:05 AM by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I’d like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.”)
Trump on Kim Davis: I hate to see her being sent to jail but the law is the law
Hotair ^ | 09/04/2015 | AllahPundit
Posted on 9/4/2015 11:57:10 AM by SeekAndFind
We’re in a weird place as a party when Trump, the would-be strongman who’s going to smash sclerotic American government as we know it, is more of a “rule of law” guy than Ted Cruz is. And way, way more of one than Mike Huckabee is.
Trump prefers an accommodation in which gay couples can get their licenses, as the Obergefell ruling requires, and Davis can opt out so that she’s not involved in something that violates her religious beliefs. But she doesn’t want to opt out. She wants to force the whole office to opt out by forbidding her deputies from issuing licenses without her approval. As recently as yesterday, during her contempt hearing, her lawyers were warning people that marriage licenses issued today by her staff (there have already been two as of 10:30 a.m. ET) while she’s in jail won’t be valid because they lack her signature as county clerk — and she might not be wrong about that. What she’s doing, as Charles Cooke put it, isn’t so much seeking a conscientious objection for herself as demanding a right of secession for Rowan County from the post-Obergefell legal regime. Cruz and Huckabee seem okay with that. Trump evidently isn’t.
“The other simple answer is rather than going through this, [because] it’s really a very, very sticky situation, a terrible situation — 30 miles away they have other places, they have many other places where you get licensed, and you have them actually quite nearby,” Mr. Trump said. “That’s another alternative. I hate to see her being put in jail. I understand what they’re doing. It would be certainly nice if she didn’t do it, but other people in her office do it but from what I understand she won’t allow other people in her office to do it.
”Bottom line, host Joe Scarborough said, is that if Supreme Court makes a decision, that’s the law of land, right? “You have to go with it,” Mr. Trump said. “The decision’s been made, and that is the law of the land.”…
“She can take a pass and let somebody else in the office do it in terms of religious, so you know, it’s a very … tough situation, but we are a nation, as I said yesterday, we’re a nation of laws,” he said. “And I was talking about borders and I was talking about other things, but you know, it applies to this, also, and the Supreme Court has ruled. It would be nice to have other people in her office do what they have to do.”
1 posted on 9/4/2015 11:57:11 AM by SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFindWhat she’s doing, as Charles Cooke put it, isn’t so much seeking a conscientious objection for herself as demanding a right of secession for Rowan County from the post-Obergefell legal regime.I want to secede from this madness myself. Where can I sign up???
To: SeekAndFind
To: ScottinVAWell, that should create some interesting internal conflict in the minds mod his supporters.Not at all. Trump said it this week. That’s enough to make it Gospel for most of them, until he says something different.
To: SeekAndFindEarly signs that, in this case, Trump doesn’t GET IT.He doesn’t “get” WHY she’s doing this in regard to the GREATER reason behind it.If Trump looses his luster it will be because he shows lack of understanding of the deeper issue.
I will say Cruz appears to grasp the dynamics of this woman’s resistance.
To: SeekAndFindTrump is going to lose a lot of support by joining the dark side in its’ war against Christians. This is going to cost him dearly. Epic fail. As bad as Cruz supporting TPA. Cruz managed to walk that back some what. Trump better start walking this back pronto.
30 posted on 9/4/2015 12:10:52 PM by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
To: Tenacious 1
To: VideoDoctor
To: DannyTNNo one is going to fix this one without Congressional action.You got that right.Trump should state as much. I believe it would add to his poll numbers.
To: ClarenceThomasfanWARNING! WARNING! WARNING!
YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE UN-OFFICIAL “NEVER SPEAK BADLY OF DONALD TRUMP OR RISK BEING CALLED A RINO” POLICY ON FREE REPUBLIC!
FURTHER ATTEMPTS AT VIOLATING THIS POLICY WILL RESULT IN SOCIAL OSTRACIZATION AND/OR QUESTIONING OF YOUR MANHOOD/WOMANHOOD, INTELLIGENCE OR CONSERVATIVE BONA FIDES!
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED…!
McCarthy’s comments on Benghazi probe may be a political gift to Clinton
Washington Post ^ | 10/1/15 | Philip Rucker and Robert Costa
Posted on 10/1/2015 8:32:34 PM by Titus-MaximusHillary Rodham Clinton’s upcoming appearance before the U.S. House Select Committee on Benghazi was supposed to be a crucible: a chance for Republicans to prosecute the former secretary of state for her handling of the 2012 terrorist attacks that killed four Americans as well as for her use of a private e-mail server. Instead, it may have turned into a political gift for Clinton following this week’s suggestion by the likely next House speaker, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), that the taxpayer-funded Benghazi investigation was politically motivated. Clinton’s allies say his comments will help recast Clinton’s scheduled Oct. 22 hearing as a partisan inquisition rather than a fact-finding mission about the attacks in Libya. McCarthy boasted in two television interviews on Tuesday that the committee’s work already had achieved a desired result: Clinton’s decline in the polls. The statements riled Democrats by seeming to validate their suspicions about the probe, which led to the discovery of Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server — a controversy that has dogged her for seven months.
***************
I saw this mook do this live and I said to myself “What a fool! He just gave the most corrupt politician in the world, a get out of jail free card.” McCarthy should not be the Speaker, he’s too stupid, flat footed and doesn’t understand the nature of the world in DC.Then he tries to make it better on Brett Baier’s show and makes it worse. Looks weak, guilty and stupid. He cannot attack, he’s not capable. Hillary is a big fat guilty pinata, chock full of top secret emails, chock full of criminal bribes, chock full of conflicts of interest, chock full of broken espionage laws, and the limp McCarthy can barely swing a wet noodle.He doesn’t know what he is doing. He doesn’t know how to fight. He cannot even make a case against Hillary, who is the most guilty person walking the Earth. She lied to the parents of the Benghazi heroes, lied to their faces over their coffins. Just keep saying that McCarthy, you idiot. Over and over again. She lied to save her own political hide, to weeping mothers of American heroes!
McCarthy is not up for the job.
To: Titus-MaximusNot only is McCarthy a pro amnesty shill but he is an idiot as well for saying this.
3 posted on 10/1/2015 8:35:15 PM by amnestynone (Political Correction is a tactic based social intimidation to suppress opposing views.)
To: Titus-MaximusDespicably stupid. Qualifies himself as a gibbering idiot moron.
Perfect leader for the Stupid Party. Ptooey.
There is no “peak wingnut”, there is no “bottom to stupidity”.
Not sure why they want to show it off in public, though.