Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Bolton out of the pack edition




Ex-adviser John Bolton risks facing charges if he publishes book
DW ^ | 16 June 2020 | DW

Posted on 6/16/2020, 5:21:26 AM by Cronos

Donald Trump said his former National Security Adviser John Bolton may face a “criminal problem” if he goes ahead with the publication of his book that is expected to be highly critical of the president.

US President Donald Trump said on Monday that his former national security adviser, John Bolton, could face criminal liability if he doesn’t halt the publication of his new book that is expected to provide an insider account of the Trump administration.

“I will consider every conversation with me as president highly classified. So that would mean that if he wrote a book and if the book gets out he’s broken the law,” Trump said. “That’s called criminal liability. That’s a big thing,” he said.

Bolton, who served as Trump’s national security adviser for about 18 months, is a controversial figure in Washington. He is a Republican policymaker known for his hawkish stance on foreign affairs. Bolton was fired by Trump in September 2019 over simmering differences on a range of foreign policy issues, most notably North Korea and Afghanistan.

‘Addicted to chaos’

In the book, titled “The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir,” Bolton writes that almost every decision by Trump was motivated by domestic politics, and that he committed impeachable offenses even beyond the charges related to Ukraine.

“I am hard-pressed to identify any significant Trump decision during my tenure that wasn’t driven by reelection calculations,” Bolton writes in the book, according to a statement by the publishers, Simon and Schuster.

The book describes Trump as “a President addicted to chaos, who embraced our enemies and spurned our friends, and was deeply suspicious of his own government,” the statement said.

Pre-publication review

Trump has accused Bolton of not completing the clearance process required for a book by former government officials who had access to sensitive information. While Trump admitted he had not read the book, he said the problem of revealing conversations with the president “becomes even worse if he lies about the conversation, which I understand he might have in some cases.”

“We’ll see what happens. They’re in court or they’ll soon be in court,” Trump said.

US Attorney General William Barr also raised concerns over the pre-publication review process, and added that the Trump administration was “trying to get them to go through the process and make the necessary deletions of classified information.”

Bolton’s lawyer Chuck Cooper has contradicted these statements, saying that his client had painstakingly worked with classifications specialists at the White House National Security Council to ensure classified material is not published.

“This is a transparent attempt to use national security as a pretext to censor Mr. Bolton, in violation of his constitutional right to speak on matters of the utmost public importance,”according to Cooper. “This attempt will not succeed, and Mr. Bolton’s book will be published June 23.”


Bolton should stop this publishing action now. What is he trying to do??And look at Bolton’s lawyer pulling out nonsense from his hat

1 posted on 6/16/2020, 5:21:26 AM by Cronos
To: Cronos


Bolton is like a JILTED GIRL!! He’s going to do anything he can to RUIN TRUMP!

6 posted on 6/16/2020, 5:44:24 AM by Ann Archy (Abortion……. The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)

The Darnold ruined himself, a long time ago.
To: Cronos


The book describes Trump as “a President addicted to chaos, who embraced our enemies and spurned our friends, and was deeply suspicious of his own government,” the statement said.

Boltons’ book is a lying hit piece straight out. Bolton is a piece of shit who deserves a curb-stomping.

10 posted on 6/16/2020, 6:05:26 AM by TalBlack

Also, you can just say “shit” on Free Republic now?
To: Leaning Right


“John Bolton risks facing charges

You mean like Strok and Paige or Comey or Brennan or Clapper or Schift or Rosenstien or McCabe? You mean that kind of risk? You mean because he stole pages of notes from meetings he attended with Trump and others and used them to write his book. Risks my ass, nothing will happen to him.

14 posted on 6/16/2020, 7:18:40 AM by abbastanza


To: Cronos

There was a time when I liked  every Freeper worshiped  John Bolton.


It’s discouraging how many public figures I believed in, only to find out that they were actually a globalist, a Leftist, and/or part of the Deep State.

20 posted on 6/16/2020, 4:29:54 PM by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)

Well, since nothing (including his disastrous cabinet picks) can ever be The Darnold’s fault, whose fault IS it??
To: McGruff


The people who convinced PDJT is hire Bolton in the first place need to sacked immediately. And they have already been so, there(sic) names need to be made public.

4 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:08:57 PM by Armscor38

Wait for it…
To: Armscor38


I’d like to know who promoted Bolton to Trump.

9 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:10:56 PM by McGruff

Wait for it…
To: McGruff


Hannity and Mark Levin apparently both helped.

11 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:12:37 PM by Aria

To: Armscor38


Hannity was one.

12 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:14:02 PM by sheehan (DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS.)

Much much more, including The Revenge Of The Supremes!

Jeez – I could do an entire “Obsession” post on just the Supreme Court and Freeperati reaction to that back-stabbing Trump selection :

Supreme Court declines to hear Trump challenge to California sanctuary law The Washington Times ^ | June 15, 2020 | Stephen Dinan Posted on 6/15/2020, 11:43:32 AM by Anti-Bubba182

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the administration’s challenge to California’s main sanctuary city law protecting illegal immigrants, dealing a significant blow to President Trump’s hopes of forcing jurisdictions to cooperate with ICE.

The justices did not offer comment on their decision, though two — Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. — said they wanted to hear the case. It takes four justices to put a case on the court’s calendar…….”


This ruling is catastrophic. This means people can come into the country in any number and the immigration laws cannot be enforced. It is a boon to demagoguing Democrats who will happily accommodate them for the votes.
1 posted on 6/15/2020, 11:43:33 AM by Anti-Bubba182
Are you sure you’re the “Anti-Bubba”?  You sound a lot like the real Bubba to me.
To: Anti-Bubba182


It is. The beginning of the end of this country as we have known it.

2 posted on 6/15/2020, 11:46:09 AM by Parley Baer

To: Anti-Bubba182



7 posted on 6/15/2020, 11:50:32 AM by EagleUSA

To: Parley Baer


Today was a bloodbath in the Supreme Court.

God has turned his face away from us.

18 posted on 6/15/2020, 12:03:19 PM by Vaden (First they came for the Confederates… Next they came for Washington… Then they came…)

Anywhoo, back to the bath of blood…
To: nbenyo


“What happened to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh?”

They are high-fiving on how they fooled everyone.

The last solid conservative justice we got was Alito.

134 posted on 6/16/2020, 2:27:24 PM by Zack Attack

Fuck that! Why didn’t Scalia strike this down???
Oh – that’s right.
God struck him down.
Comment #84 Removed by Moderator
I wonder what got deleted?  Maybe some other Freeper quoted it?
To: dljordan
“This is about getting rid of White people.”


Many here will cringe at your words but you’re 100% correct.

119 posted on 6/15/2020, 7:00:30 PM by JonPreston
What a surprise !
Well, it couldn’t get any worse for them, could it?

Supreme Court Rules Against Trump in DACA Case (Roberts strikes again!) Supreme Court of the United States ^ | June 18, 2020 | Scumbag Roberts Posted on 6/18/2020, 9:08:14 AM by Stravinsky

The week just keeps getting better and better!

1 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:08:14 AM by Stravinsky
Doesn’t it just?
To: Stravinsky


Dear mercy

2 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:09:06 AM by Guenevere (Press On!)

To: Stravinsky


What is the point of voting anymore?

10 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:11:31 AM by Shadow44

That will become apparent to you this November.
Let the Roberts-bashing commence!!
To: Stravinsky


Always thought something was wrong with Roberts. Look at his eyes….they’re the same as AOC or Schiff… I will be anything Roberts is a closet homosexual and too afraid to admit it (Not that there is anything wrong with that)

5 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:10:15 AM by Fawn (“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” Hosea 4:6)

To: Bayard


Blackmailed about his adopted kids.

7 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:10:37 AM by Ann Archy (Abortion……. The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)

To: Bayard


His kids were supposedly adopted from South America, but they most likely came from IRELAND which is ILLEGAL!!

And he may be a BI SEXUAL!

19 posted on 6/18/2020, 9:15:36 AM by Ann Archy (Abortion……. The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)

ZOMG!!!  NO!!!!!
Well, at least things couldn’t get any worse for the Freeperati.

Confederate flag will be prohibited from all NASCAR events and properties. twitter sportscenter ^ Posted on 6/10/2020, 4:08:04 PM by janetjanet998

NASCAR announced in a statement that “the display of the confederate flag will be prohibited from all NASCAR events and properties.

1 posted on 6/10/2020, 4:08:04 PM by janetjanet998
Damnit, JanetJanet!
To: janetjanet998


Circling the bowl …

5 posted on 6/10/2020, 4:10:05 PM by bankwalker (groupthink kills …)

You do seem to be, yes.

To: janetjanet998

I guess they don’t remember where their Roots came from.

I do. Hilbilly bootleggers.

I hope all the fans quit going. When they open up that is.

7 posted on 6/10/2020, 4:10:50 PM by CottonBall (A Republican’s power comes from your prosperity. A Democrat’s power comes from your poverty.f)

So until they open up, you’re going to boycott them?
That’s enough for one go-round, I think.  I’m getting over-hydrated from ingesting Freeper Tears.
See you good people next Monday!

One thought on “Today on Tommy T’s Obsession with the Freeperati – Bolton out of the pack edition

  1. I hope that more Freepers start thinking, “What’s the point of voting?”

Comments are closed.